From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>,
Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@arm.com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 6.12.y 4/4] mm/gup: recheck the PUD under PTL in follow_pud_mask()
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2026 21:34:44 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261112023429.1348841-4-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261112023429.1348841-1-sashal@kernel.org>
From: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 79cb51d538abc459f74e046d27797d36b133ce0e ]
follow_pud_mask() reads the PUD without a lock. If it is a leaf, it takes
the lock and calls follow_huge_pud(), which reads the entry again, but
only tests whether it is present.
A leaf can be zapped concurrently and a page fault can fill the empty
entry with a page table.
This currently only applies when device-dax makes use of PUD entries,
and the fault after e.g., MADV_DONTNEED would find THPs to be disabled.
That requires a sequence like
1) Fault in the PUD
2) Disable THP
3) Have GUP race against concurrent MADV_DONTNEED + refault
Which is rather unlikely to happen in practice, which is why we never
received a report about such a problem.
Before commit 1b1676180246 ("mm/gup: handle huge pud for
follow_pud_mask()"), we performed that check in follow_devmap_pud() by
testing for pud_devmap().
Let's fix it by just structuring follow_pud_mask() similar to
follow_pmd_mask(), minus protnone stuff that does not apply and minus
FOLL_SPLIT_PMD handling. That makes it much easier to spot any such
inconsistencies.
Perform the pud_bad() check early in follow_pmd_mask() and just forward
the PUD value. We can drop the pud_present() check in follow_huge_pud(),
just like we have in follow_huge_pmd().
Even though we are performing more changes than strictly necessary, the
fix should be easy to backport.
Fixes: 1b1676180246 ("mm/gup: handle huge pud for follow_pud_mask()")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Tested-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@arm.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20261031-fixes_core-v3-19-d6437171ecc3@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand (Arm) <david@kernel.org>
[ sashal: adjusted hunk context for the older pud_write() permission check in place of can_follow_write_pud() ]
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
mm/gup.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c
index b8367869f7928..5c7ebf897476a 100644
--- a/mm/gup.c
+++ b/mm/gup.c
@@ -632,9 +632,6 @@ static struct page *follow_huge_pud(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
if ((flags & FOLL_WRITE) && !pud_write(pud))
return NULL;
- if (!pud_present(pud))
- return NULL;
-
pfn += (addr & ~PUD_MASK) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
page = pfn_to_page(pfn);
@@ -911,15 +908,17 @@ static struct page *follow_page_pte(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
}
static struct page *follow_pmd_mask(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
- unsigned long address, pud_t *pudp,
- unsigned int flags,
- unsigned long *page_mask)
+ unsigned long address, pud_t *pudp, pud_t pud,
+ unsigned int flags, unsigned long *page_mask)
{
pmd_t *pmd, pmdval;
spinlock_t *ptl;
struct page *page;
struct mm_struct *mm = vma->vm_mm;
+ if (unlikely(pud_bad(pud)))
+ return no_page_table(vma, flags, address);
+
pmd = pmd_offset(pudp, address);
pmdval = pmdp_get_lockless(pmd);
if (pmd_none(pmdval))
@@ -968,18 +967,23 @@ static struct page *follow_pud_mask(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
pud = pudp_get(pudp);
if (!pud_present(pud))
return no_page_table(vma, flags, address);
- if (pud_leaf(pud)) {
- ptl = pud_lock(mm, pudp);
- page = follow_huge_pud(vma, address, pudp, flags, page_mask);
+ if (!pud_leaf(pud))
+ return follow_pmd_mask(vma, address, pudp, pud, flags, page_mask);
+
+ ptl = pud_lock(mm, pudp);
+ pud = *pudp;
+ if (unlikely(!pud_present(pud))) {
spin_unlock(ptl);
- if (page)
- return page;
return no_page_table(vma, flags, address);
}
- if (unlikely(pud_bad(pud)))
- return no_page_table(vma, flags, address);
+ if (unlikely(!pud_leaf(pud))) {
+ spin_unlock(ptl);
+ return follow_pmd_mask(vma, address, pudp, pud, flags, page_mask);
+ }
- return follow_pmd_mask(vma, address, pudp, flags, page_mask);
+ page = follow_huge_pud(vma, address, pudp, flags, page_mask);
+ spin_unlock(ptl);
+ return page;
}
static struct page *follow_p4d_mask(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
--
2.53.0
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-12 2:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-10 1:09 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mm/gup: recheck the PUD under PTL in follow_pud_mask()" failed to apply to 6.12-stable tree Sasha Levin
2026-11-12 2:34 ` [PATCH 6.12.y 1/4] mm/gup: remove redundant check for PCI P2PDMA page Sasha Levin
2026-11-12 2:34 ` [PATCH 6.12.y 2/4] mm/gup: remove pXX_devmap usage from get_user_pages() Sasha Levin
2026-11-12 2:34 ` [PATCH 6.12.y 3/4] mm/gup: remove dead pgmap refcounting code Sasha Levin
2026-11-12 2:34 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261112023429.1348841-4-sashal@kernel.org \
--to=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=usama.anjum@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox