From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>, linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "jianchao.wang" <jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@wdc.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
Israel Rukshin <israelr@mellanox.com>,
Max Gurtovoy <maxg@mellanox.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] blk-mq: fix race between complete and BLK_EH_RESET_TIMER
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2018 21:06:07 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4008f36d-c2c4-25b9-4af5-8efbe9d452c0@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180412115956.16207-1-ming.lei@redhat.com>
On 4/12/18 5:59 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
> The normal request completion can be done before or during handling
> BLK_EH_RESET_TIMER, and this race may cause the request to never be
> completed since driver's .timeout() may always return
> BLK_EH_RESET_TIMER.
>
> This issue can't be fixed completely by driver, since the normal
> completion can be done between returning .timeout() and handling
> BLK_EH_RESET_TIMER.
>
> This patch fixes the race by introducing rq state of
> MQ_RQ_COMPLETE_IN_RESET, and reading/writing rq's state by holding
> queue lock, which can be per-request actually, but just not necessary
> to introduce one lock for so unusual event.
>
> Also when .timeout() returns BLK_EH_HANDLED, sync with normal
> completion path before completing this timed-out rq finally for
> avoiding this rq's state touched by normal completion.
I like this approach since it keeps the cost outside of the fast
path. And it's fine to reuse the queue lock for this, instead of
adding a special lock for something we consider a rare occurrence.
>From a quick look this looks sane, but I'll take a closer look
tomrrow and add some testing too.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-14 3:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-12 11:59 [PATCH V3] blk-mq: fix race between complete and BLK_EH_RESET_TIMER Ming Lei
2018-04-14 3:06 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2018-04-14 15:22 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-04-15 15:15 ` Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4008f36d-c2c4-25b9-4af5-8efbe9d452c0@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bart.vanassche@wdc.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=israelr@mellanox.com \
--cc=jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maxg@mellanox.com \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox