Linux kernel -stable discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ferry Toth <fntoth@gmail.com>
To: Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@synopsys.com>,
	Ferry Toth <ftoth@exalondelft.nl>
Cc: "linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>,
	Liu Shixin <liushixin2@huawei.com>,
	Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@gmail.com>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] usb: dwc3: core: defer probe on ulpi_read_id timeout
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 13:29:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53dde473-2e88-7f51-7417-fce3a73fb8c8@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221118021107.3uhixtck6sawluoy@synopsys.com>


On 18-11-2022 03:11, Thinh Nguyen wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2022, Ferry Toth wrote:
>> Since commit 0f010171
> I don't your update as noted in the v3 change (ie. Greg's suggestions).

Indeed. I seem to have sent in the wrong sha. Sorry about this.

>> Dual Role support on Intel Merrifield platform broke due to rearranging
>> the call to dwc3_get_extcon().
>>
>> It appears to be caused by ulpi_read_id() masking the timeout on the first
>> test write. In the past dwc3 probe continued by calling dwc3_core_soft_reset()
>> followed by dwc3_get_extcon() which happend to return -EPROBE_DEFER.
>> On deferred probe ulpi_read_id() finally succeeded.
>>
>> As we now changed ulpi_read_id() to return -ETIMEDOUT in this case, we
>> need to handle the error by calling dwc3_core_soft_reset() and request
>> -EPROBE_DEFER. On deferred probe ulpi_read_id() is retried and succeeds.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ferry Toth <ftoth@exalondelft.nl>
>> ---
>>   drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c | 7 ++++++-
>>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c
>> index 648f1c570021..2779f17bffaf 100644
>> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c
>> @@ -1106,8 +1106,13 @@ static int dwc3_core_init(struct dwc3 *dwc)
>>   
>>   	if (!dwc->ulpi_ready) {
>>   		ret = dwc3_core_ulpi_init(dwc);
>> -		if (ret)
>> +		if (ret) {
>> +			if (ret == -ETIMEDOUT) {
>> +				dwc3_core_soft_reset(dwc);
> I'm not sure if you saw my previous response. I wanted to check to see
> if we need to do soft-reset once before ulpi init as part of its
> initialization.
I missed it but found it now. I will try your suggestion and answer.
> I'm just curious why Andrey Smirnov test doesn't require this change. If
> it's a quirk for this specific configuration, then the change here is
> fine. If it's required for all ULPI setup, then we can unconditionally
> do that for all ULPI setup during initialization.

Yes me too. I can reproduce that when I build kernel and rootfs with 
buildroot there is no issue. But as soon as I add ftrace / bootconfig 
the issue appears and then I can't analyze the flow. It's seems some 
kind of timing / race.

However, I have tried deferring without dwc3_core_soft_reset() (to 
verify if it is just a matter of time) and that doesn't work. dwc3 is 
deferred about 10x and then gives up without phy. So, it's not just the 
time and not just a matter of retrying the test write.

>> +				ret = -EPROBE_DEFER;
>> +			}
>>   			goto err0;
>> +		}
>>   		dwc->ulpi_ready = true;
>>   	}
>>   
>> -- 
>> 2.37.2
>>
> Thanks,
> Thinh

  reply	other threads:[~2022-11-18 12:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-17 20:54 [PATCH v3 0/2] usb: dwc3: core: defer probe on ulpi_read_id timeout Ferry Toth
2022-11-17 20:54 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] usb: ulpi: defer ulpi_register " Ferry Toth
2022-11-18 10:31   ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-11-17 20:54 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] usb: dwc3: core: defer probe " Ferry Toth
2022-11-17 20:54   ` kernel test robot
2022-11-18  2:11   ` Thinh Nguyen
2022-11-18 12:29     ` Ferry Toth [this message]
2022-11-18 19:49       ` Thinh Nguyen
2022-11-18 10:32 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] " Andy Shevchenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53dde473-2e88-7f51-7417-fce3a73fb8c8@gmail.com \
    --to=fntoth@gmail.com \
    --cc=Thinh.Nguyen@synopsys.com \
    --cc=andrew.smirnov@gmail.com \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ftoth@exalondelft.nl \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liushixin2@huawei.com \
    --cc=sean.anderson@seco.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox