From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: Wentao Guan <guanwentao@uniontech.com>
Cc: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
dhowells@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org, jaltman@auristor.com,
kuba@kernel.org, linux-afs@lists.infradead.org,
marc.dionne@auristor.com, stable@kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 6.6] rxrpc: Fix potential UAF after skb_unshare() failure
Date: Fri, 8 May 2026 17:11:43 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <939b8e49da80ebac-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260508083142.1752208-1-guanwentao@uniontech.com>
> Subject: [PATCH RFC 6.6] rxrpc: Fix potential UAF after skb_unshare() failure
>
> [ Upstream commit 1f2740150f904bfa60e4bad74d65add3ccb5e7f8 ]
>
> [ Readd rxrpc_skb_put_response_copy() or will cause a build fail with commit
> 24481a7f5733 ("rxrpc: Fix conn-level packet handling to unshare RESPONSE
> packets") ]
Queued for 6.6, thanks.
I also took the mainline follow-up 55b2984c96c37 ("rxrpc: Fix
rxrpc_input_call_event() to only unshare DATA packets", a Fixes:
of 1f2740150f90) on top, so 6.6 ends up with the same pair that
6.12 already shipped (bf20f46d94f1d + 016725807ce3). Without it
the unconditional skb_copy() of every cloned ACK/ABORT/ACKALL
would re-introduce exactly the regression that follow-up commit
fixed.
--
Thanks,
Sasha
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-08 21:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-01 12:07 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] rxrpc: Fix conn-level packet handling to unshare RESPONSE" failed to apply to 6.6-stable tree gregkh
2026-05-03 14:33 ` [PATCH 6.6.y] rxrpc: Fix conn-level packet handling to unshare RESPONSE packets Sasha Levin
2026-05-08 8:31 ` [PATCH RFC 6.6] rxrpc: Fix potential UAF after skb_unshare() failure Wentao Guan
2026-05-08 8:57 ` Greg KH
2026-05-08 9:38 ` Wentao Guan
2026-05-08 21:11 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2026-05-09 20:01 ` Backport RXRPC for 6.1.y from 6.2 Wentao Guan
2026-05-10 16:17 ` Greg KH
2026-05-10 16:36 ` Wentao Guan
2026-05-10 16:43 ` Greg KH
2026-05-10 17:25 ` Jeffrey E Altman
2026-05-10 17:41 ` Wentao Guan
2026-05-10 18:04 ` Jeffrey E Altman
2026-05-10 18:26 ` Wentao Guan
2026-05-10 18:38 ` Jeffrey E Altman
2026-05-10 20:21 ` Wentao Guan
2026-05-10 20:50 ` Jeffrey Altman
2026-05-10 21:47 ` Wentao Guan
2026-05-10 22:30 ` Wentao Guan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=939b8e49da80ebac-sashal@kernel.org \
--to=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=guanwentao@uniontech.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jaltman@auristor.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-afs@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=marc.dionne@auristor.com \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox