From: Wentao Guan <guanwentao@uniontech.com>
To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, guanwentao@uniontech.com, horms@kernel.org,
jaltman@auristor.com, kuba@kernel.org,
linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, marc.dionne@auristor.com,
sashal@kernel.org, stable@kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Re: Backport RXRPC for 6.1.y from 6.2
Date: Mon, 11 May 2026 00:36:36 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260510163636.260801-1-guanwentao@uniontech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2026051040-primary-anyway-9a79@gregkh>
> Why is this needed? If you want this, please provide a working set of
> patches properly submitted, along with the reasoning why you just don't
> move to a newer kernel version. And do you really use the AFS
> filesystem in a 6.1.y kernel tree? If so, why?
FYI, there are bugfixes such as ("rxrpc: Fix conn-level packet handling to unshare RESPONSE packets")
affect the 6.1.y kernel, and the final goal is clean apply fixes for CVE-2026-43500 such as
("rxrpc: Also unshare DATA/RESPONSE packets when paged frags are present") in maillist.
> move to a newer kernel version. And do you really use the AFS
> filesystem in a 6.1.y kernel tree? If so, why?
NO, just affected by compiled kernel which enabled the config:(,
we are preparing fix such as disable AFS and AF_RXRPC or fix it...
BRs
Wentao Guan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-10 16:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-01 12:07 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] rxrpc: Fix conn-level packet handling to unshare RESPONSE" failed to apply to 6.6-stable tree gregkh
2026-05-03 14:33 ` [PATCH 6.6.y] rxrpc: Fix conn-level packet handling to unshare RESPONSE packets Sasha Levin
2026-05-08 8:31 ` [PATCH RFC 6.6] rxrpc: Fix potential UAF after skb_unshare() failure Wentao Guan
2026-05-08 8:57 ` Greg KH
2026-05-08 9:38 ` Wentao Guan
2026-05-08 21:11 ` Sasha Levin
2026-05-09 20:01 ` Backport RXRPC for 6.1.y from 6.2 Wentao Guan
2026-05-10 16:17 ` Greg KH
2026-05-10 16:36 ` Wentao Guan [this message]
2026-05-10 16:43 ` Greg KH
2026-05-10 17:25 ` Jeffrey E Altman
2026-05-10 17:41 ` Wentao Guan
2026-05-10 18:04 ` Jeffrey E Altman
2026-05-10 18:26 ` Wentao Guan
2026-05-10 18:38 ` Jeffrey E Altman
2026-05-10 20:21 ` Wentao Guan
2026-05-10 20:50 ` Jeffrey Altman
2026-05-10 21:47 ` Wentao Guan
2026-05-10 22:30 ` Wentao Guan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260510163636.260801-1-guanwentao@uniontech.com \
--to=guanwentao@uniontech.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jaltman@auristor.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-afs@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=marc.dionne@auristor.com \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox