v4.4.14 build: 0 failures 1 warnings (v4.4.14)

v4.4.14 build: 0 failures 1 warnings (v4.4.14)

[Build bot for Mark Brown]

Tree/Branch: v4.4.14
Git describe: v4.4.14
Commit: 9ca1d50fa9 Linux 4.4.14

Build Time: 121 min 37 sec

Passed:    9 / 9   (100.00 %)
Failed:    0 / 9   (  0.00 %)

Errors: 0
Warnings: 1
Section Mismatches: 0

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
defconfigs with issues (other than build errors):
      1 warnings    0 mismatches  : arm64-allmodconfig

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Warnings Summary: 1
	  1 ../drivers/xen/balloon.c:155:13: warning: 'release_memory_resource' declared 'static' but never defined [-Wunused-function]



===============================================================================
Detailed per-defconfig build reports below:


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
arm64-allmodconfig : PASS, 0 errors, 1 warnings, 0 section mismatches

Warnings:
	../drivers/xen/balloon.c:155:13: warning: 'release_memory_resource' declared 'static' but never defined [-Wunused-function]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Passed with no errors, warnings or mismatches:

arm64-allnoconfig
arm-multi_v5_defconfig
arm-multi_v7_defconfig
x86_64-defconfig
arm-allmodconfig
arm-allnoconfig
x86_64-allnoconfig
arm64-defconfig
close failed in file object destructor:
sys.excepthook is missing
lost sys.stderr

Re: v4.4.14 build: 0 failures 1 warnings (v4.4.14)

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Saturday, June 25, 2016 12:37:17 AM CEST Build bot for Mark Brown wrote:
> Warnings Summary: 1
> arm64-allmodconfig : PASS, 0 errors, 1 warnings, 0 section mismatches
>           1 ../drivers/xen/balloon.c:155:13: warning:
>             'release_memory_resource' declared 'static' but never defined
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Passed with no errors, warnings or mismatches:
> 
> arm64-allnoconfig
> arm-multi_v5_defconfig
> arm-multi_v7_defconfig
> x86_64-defconfig
> arm-allmodconfig
> arm-allnoconfig
> x86_64-allnoconfig
> arm64-defconfig

Hi Greg,

It seems we're down to a single warning on ARM and ARM64 now, and
the fix just got merged as commit

842775f15090 ("xen/balloon: Fix declared-but-not-defined warning")

so we can for the first time have a stable kernel that builds
without warnings on these architectures, nice!

On 4.7-rc, there are currently two warnings:
> fs/reiserfs/ibalance.c:1156:2: warning: 'new_insert_key' may be
>         used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
> drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7606_spi.c:24:18: warning: 'data' may be
>         used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]

The first one is an old issue that gcc recently started warning for,
a workaround (reiserfs: fix "new_insert_key may be used uninitialized
...") is currently in Andrew's akpm-current, but I think it's not
planned for 4.7 since it's not a regression and the code works
correctly.

The second one is a real bug, and the fix is now in the staging-linus
tree.

	Arnd

Re: v4.4.14 build: 0 failures 1 warnings (v4.4.14)

[Greg KH]

On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 11:23:05AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Saturday, June 25, 2016 12:37:17 AM CEST Build bot for Mark Brown wrote:
> > Warnings Summary: 1
> > arm64-allmodconfig : PASS, 0 errors, 1 warnings, 0 section mismatches
> >           1 ../drivers/xen/balloon.c:155:13: warning:
> >             'release_memory_resource' declared 'static' but never defined
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Passed with no errors, warnings or mismatches:
> > 
> > arm64-allnoconfig
> > arm-multi_v5_defconfig
> > arm-multi_v7_defconfig
> > x86_64-defconfig
> > arm-allmodconfig
> > arm-allnoconfig
> > x86_64-allnoconfig
> > arm64-defconfig
> 
> Hi Greg,
> 
> It seems we're down to a single warning on ARM and ARM64 now, and
> the fix just got merged as commit
> 
> 842775f15090 ("xen/balloon: Fix declared-but-not-defined warning")
> 
> so we can for the first time have a stable kernel that builds
> without warnings on these architectures, nice!

This is now queued up, thanks for pushing for these, it's great to see.

thanks,

greg k-h