Linux kernel -stable discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk>
Cc: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>,
	Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org,
	Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	patches@opensource.cirrus.com, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
Subject: Applied "ASoC: wm_adsp: Fix validation of firmware and coeff lengths" to the asoc tree
Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2017 17:18:11 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1eNMHr-0001gv-D8@debutante> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171207211928.btwtwlfci6f4hku2@xylophone.i.decadent.org.uk>

The patch

   ASoC: wm_adsp: Fix validation of firmware and coeff lengths

has been applied to the asoc tree at

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git 

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.  

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

>From 50dd2ea8ef67a1617e0c0658bcbec4b9fb03b936 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2017 16:15:20 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] ASoC: wm_adsp: Fix validation of firmware and coeff lengths

The checks for whether another region/block header could be present
are subtracting the size from the current offset.  Obviously we should
instead subtract the offset from the size.

The checks for whether the region/block data fit in the file are
adding the data size to the current offset and header size, without
checking for integer overflow.  Rearrange these so that overflow is
impossible.

Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk>
Acked-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>
Tested-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
---
 sound/soc/codecs/wm_adsp.c | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/wm_adsp.c b/sound/soc/codecs/wm_adsp.c
index 65c059b5ffd7..66e32f5d2917 100644
--- a/sound/soc/codecs/wm_adsp.c
+++ b/sound/soc/codecs/wm_adsp.c
@@ -1733,7 +1733,7 @@ static int wm_adsp_load(struct wm_adsp *dsp)
 		 le64_to_cpu(footer->timestamp));
 
 	while (pos < firmware->size &&
-	       pos - firmware->size > sizeof(*region)) {
+	       sizeof(*region) < firmware->size - pos) {
 		region = (void *)&(firmware->data[pos]);
 		region_name = "Unknown";
 		reg = 0;
@@ -1782,8 +1782,8 @@ static int wm_adsp_load(struct wm_adsp *dsp)
 			 regions, le32_to_cpu(region->len), offset,
 			 region_name);
 
-		if ((pos + le32_to_cpu(region->len) + sizeof(*region)) >
-		    firmware->size) {
+		if (le32_to_cpu(region->len) >
+		    firmware->size - pos - sizeof(*region)) {
 			adsp_err(dsp,
 				 "%s.%d: %s region len %d bytes exceeds file length %zu\n",
 				 file, regions, region_name,
@@ -2253,7 +2253,7 @@ static int wm_adsp_load_coeff(struct wm_adsp *dsp)
 
 	blocks = 0;
 	while (pos < firmware->size &&
-	       pos - firmware->size > sizeof(*blk)) {
+	       sizeof(*blk) < firmware->size - pos) {
 		blk = (void *)(&firmware->data[pos]);
 
 		type = le16_to_cpu(blk->type);
@@ -2327,8 +2327,8 @@ static int wm_adsp_load_coeff(struct wm_adsp *dsp)
 		}
 
 		if (reg) {
-			if ((pos + le32_to_cpu(blk->len) + sizeof(*blk)) >
-			    firmware->size) {
+			if (le32_to_cpu(blk->len) >
+			    firmware->size - pos - sizeof(*blk)) {
 				adsp_err(dsp,
 					 "%s.%d: %s region len %d bytes exceeds file length %zu\n",
 					 file, blocks, region_name,
-- 
2.15.1

      parent reply	other threads:[~2017-12-08 17:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-12-07 21:19 [PATCH] ASoC: wm_adsp: Fix validation of firmware and coeff lengths Ben Hutchings
2017-12-08  9:36 ` Charles Keepax
2017-12-08 17:18 ` Mark Brown [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E1eNMHr-0001gv-D8@debutante \
    --to=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk \
    --cc=ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com \
    --cc=ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=patches@opensource.cirrus.com \
    --cc=rf@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox