Linux kernel -stable discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, sashal@kernel.org,
	david regan <dregan@mail.com>,
	Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
	Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
	"open list:NAND FLASH SUBSYSTEM" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND stable 4.9] mtd: rawnand: brcmnand: Fixed incorrect sub-page ECC status
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2022 18:54:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YhZ0vZxlp1VTgNG8@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220223174431.1083-3-f.fainelli@gmail.com>

On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 09:44:31AM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> From: david regan <dregan@mail.com>
> 
> commit 36415a7964711822e63695ea67fede63979054d9 upstream
> 
> The brcmnand driver contains a bug in which if a page (example 2k byte)
> is read from the parallel/ONFI NAND and within that page a subpage (512
> byte) has correctable errors which is followed by a subpage with
> uncorrectable errors, the page read will return the wrong status of
> correctable (as opposed to the actual status of uncorrectable.)
> 
> The bug is in function brcmnand_read_by_pio where there is a check for
> uncorrectable bits which will be preempted if a previous status for
> correctable bits is detected.
> 
> The fix is to stop checking for bad bits only if we already have a bad
> bits status.
> 
> Fixes: 27c5b17cd1b1 ("mtd: nand: add NAND driver "library" for Broadcom STB NAND controller")
> Signed-off-by: david regan <dregan@mail.com>
> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/trinity-478e0c09-9134-40e8-8f8c-31c371225eda-1643237024774@3c-app-mailcom-lxa02
> [florian: make patch apply to 4.14, file was renamed]
> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/mtd/nand/brcmnand/brcmnand.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Why is this a RESEND?  What happened with the first set?

thanks,

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2022-02-23 17:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-23 17:44 [PATCH RESEND stable 4.19] mtd: rawnand: brcmnand: Fixed incorrect sub-page ECC status Florian Fainelli
2022-02-23 17:44 ` [PATCH RESEND stable 4.14] " Florian Fainelli
2022-02-23 17:44 ` [PATCH RESEND stable 4.9] " Florian Fainelli
2022-02-23 17:54   ` Greg KH [this message]
2022-02-23 17:54     ` Florian Fainelli
2022-02-23 18:24       ` Greg KH
2022-02-23 18:29         ` Florian Fainelli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YhZ0vZxlp1VTgNG8@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
    --cc=dregan@mail.com \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox