* The linux-5.17.y tag looks bogus.
@ 2022-03-21 10:13 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-03-21 10:17 ` Greg KH
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior @ 2022-03-21 10:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gregkh; +Cc: stable, tglx
Hi,
I just noticed that the stable repository has the linux-5.17.y tag and
no branch with the linux-5.17.y name. That tag looks like a copy of
Linus' v5.17.
I guess this is a mistake. On my side git refused to push the
linux-5.17.y branch because it already had a tag with the same name.
Could you please remove it?
Sebastian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: The linux-5.17.y tag looks bogus.
2022-03-21 10:13 The linux-5.17.y tag looks bogus Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
@ 2022-03-21 10:17 ` Greg KH
2022-03-21 10:22 ` Greg KH
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2022-03-21 10:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior; +Cc: stable, tglx
On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 11:13:17AM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just noticed that the stable repository has the linux-5.17.y tag and
> no branch with the linux-5.17.y name. That tag looks like a copy of
> Linus' v5.17.
>
> I guess this is a mistake. On my side git refused to push the
> linux-5.17.y branch because it already had a tag with the same name.
I have not created the 5.17.y branch yet.
What tag are you seeing?
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: The linux-5.17.y tag looks bogus.
2022-03-21 10:17 ` Greg KH
@ 2022-03-21 10:22 ` Greg KH
2022-03-21 10:35 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2022-03-21 10:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior; +Cc: stable, tglx
On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 11:17:29AM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 11:13:17AM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I just noticed that the stable repository has the linux-5.17.y tag and
> > no branch with the linux-5.17.y name. That tag looks like a copy of
> > Linus' v5.17.
> >
> > I guess this is a mistake. On my side git refused to push the
> > linux-5.17.y branch because it already had a tag with the same name.
>
> I have not created the 5.17.y branch yet.
>
> What tag are you seeing?
Ah, I see that now. That's odd. I've deleted it, I don't know how that
got created, maybe our scripts messed up. Something went "odd" on the
release that git.kernel.org told me about, but I have to wait until some
people wake up in the Americas before I can figure out what actually
happened.
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: The linux-5.17.y tag looks bogus.
2022-03-21 10:22 ` Greg KH
@ 2022-03-21 10:35 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior @ 2022-03-21 10:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg KH; +Cc: stable, tglx
On 2022-03-21 11:22:48 [+0100], Greg KH wrote:
> Ah, I see that now. That's odd. I've deleted it, I don't know how that
> got created, maybe our scripts messed up. Something went "odd" on the
> release that git.kernel.org told me about, but I have to wait until some
> people wake up in the Americas before I can figure out what actually
> happened.
Thank you.
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Sebastian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-03-21 10:36 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-03-21 10:13 The linux-5.17.y tag looks bogus Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-03-21 10:17 ` Greg KH
2022-03-21 10:22 ` Greg KH
2022-03-21 10:35 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox