public inbox for stable@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v2] objtool/x86: add missing embedded_insn check
@ 2023-10-28 18:41 John Sperbeck
  2023-10-28 18:43 ` kernel test robot
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: John Sperbeck @ 2023-10-28 18:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gregkh; +Cc: bp, jpoimboe, patches, peterz, stable, jsperbeck

When dbf460087755 ("objtool/x86: Fixup frame-pointer vs rethunk")
was backported to some stable branches, the check for dest->embedded_insn
in is_special_call() was missed.  The result is that the warning it
was intended to suppress still appears.  For example on 6.1 (on kernels
before 6.1, the '-s' argument would instead be 'check'):

$ tools/objtool/objtool -s arch/x86/lib/retpoline.o
arch/x86/lib/retpoline.o: warning: objtool: srso_untrain_ret+0xd:
    call without frame pointer save/setup

With this patch, the warning is correctly suppressed, and the
kernel still passes the normal Google kernel developer tests.

Signed-off-by: John Sperbeck <jsperbeck@google.com>
---

I think 6.1.y, 5.15.y, and 5.10.y are the LTS branches missing the
bit of code that this patch re-adds.

Changes from v1 to v2:
* include more context in the commit message.


 tools/objtool/check.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/objtool/check.c b/tools/objtool/check.c
index f8008ab31eef..cb363b507a32 100644
--- a/tools/objtool/check.c
+++ b/tools/objtool/check.c
@@ -2478,7 +2478,7 @@ static bool is_special_call(struct instruction *insn)
 		if (!dest)
 			return false;
 
-		if (dest->fentry)
+		if (dest->fentry || dest->embedded_insn)
 			return true;
 	}
 
-- 
2.42.0.820.g83a721a137-goog


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] objtool/x86: add missing embedded_insn check
  2023-10-28 18:41 [PATCH v2] objtool/x86: add missing embedded_insn check John Sperbeck
@ 2023-10-28 18:43 ` kernel test robot
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2023-10-28 18:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: John Sperbeck; +Cc: stable, oe-kbuild-all

Hi,

Thanks for your patch.

FYI: kernel test robot notices the stable kernel rule is not satisfied.

The check is based on https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html#option-1

Rule: add the tag "Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org" in the sign-off area to have the patch automatically included in the stable tree.
Subject: [PATCH v2] objtool/x86: add missing embedded_insn check
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/stable/20231028184131.2103810-1-jsperbeck%40google.com

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2023-10-28 18:43 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-10-28 18:41 [PATCH v2] objtool/x86: add missing embedded_insn check John Sperbeck
2023-10-28 18:43 ` kernel test robot

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox