* [PATCH v2] drm/xe/sched: stop re-submitting signalled jobs
@ 2025-05-27 10:20 Matthew Auld
2025-05-27 18:20 ` Matthew Brost
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Matthew Auld @ 2025-05-27 10:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-xe; +Cc: Thomas Hellström, Matthew Brost, William Tseng, stable
Customer is reporting a really subtle issue where we get random DMAR
faults, hangs and other nasties for kernel migration jobs when stressing
stuff like s2idle/s3/s4. The explosions seems to happen somewhere
after resuming the system with splats looking something like:
PM: suspend exit
rfkill: input handler disabled
xe 0000:00:02.0: [drm] GT0: Engine reset: engine_class=bcs, logical_mask: 0x2, guc_id=0
xe 0000:00:02.0: [drm] GT0: Timedout job: seqno=24496, lrc_seqno=24496, guc_id=0, flags=0x13 in no process [-1]
xe 0000:00:02.0: [drm] GT0: Kernel-submitted job timed out
The likely cause appears to be a race between suspend cancelling the
worker that processes the free_job()'s, such that we still have pending
jobs to be freed after the cancel. Following from this, on resume the
pending_list will now contain at least one already complete job, but it
looks like we call drm_sched_resubmit_jobs(), which will then call
run_job() on everything still on the pending_list. But if the job was
already complete, then all the resources tied to the job, like the bb
itself, any memory that is being accessed, the iommu mappings etc. might
be long gone since those are usually tied to the fence signalling.
This scenario can be seen in ftrace when running a slightly modified
xe_pm (kernel was only modified to inject artificial latency into
free_job to make the race easier to hit):
xe_sched_job_run: dev=0000:00:02.0, fence=0xffff888276cc8540, seqno=0, lrc_seqno=0, gt=0, guc_id=0, batch_addr=0x000000146910 ...
xe_exec_queue_stop: dev=0000:00:02.0, 3:0x2, gt=0, width=1, guc_id=0, guc_state=0x0, flags=0x13
xe_exec_queue_stop: dev=0000:00:02.0, 3:0x2, gt=0, width=1, guc_id=1, guc_state=0x0, flags=0x4
xe_exec_queue_stop: dev=0000:00:02.0, 4:0x1, gt=1, width=1, guc_id=0, guc_state=0x0, flags=0x3
xe_exec_queue_stop: dev=0000:00:02.0, 1:0x1, gt=1, width=1, guc_id=1, guc_state=0x0, flags=0x3
xe_exec_queue_stop: dev=0000:00:02.0, 4:0x1, gt=1, width=1, guc_id=2, guc_state=0x0, flags=0x3
xe_exec_queue_resubmit: dev=0000:00:02.0, 3:0x2, gt=0, width=1, guc_id=0, guc_state=0x0, flags=0x13
xe_sched_job_run: dev=0000:00:02.0, fence=0xffff888276cc8540, seqno=0, lrc_seqno=0, gt=0, guc_id=0, batch_addr=0x000000146910 ...
.....
xe_exec_queue_memory_cat_error: dev=0000:00:02.0, 3:0x2, gt=0, width=1, guc_id=0, guc_state=0x3, flags=0x13
So the job_run() is clearly triggered twice for the same job, even
though the first must have already signalled to completion during
suspend. We can also see a CAT error after the re-submit.
To prevent this try to call xe_sched_stop() to forcefully remove
anything on the pending_list that has already signalled, before we
re-submit.
v2:
- Make sure to re-arm the fence callbacks with sched_start().
Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/-/issues/4856
Fixes: dd08ebf6c352 ("drm/xe: Introduce a new DRM driver for Intel GPUs")
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: William Tseng <william.tseng@intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.8+
---
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gpu_scheduler.h | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gpu_scheduler.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gpu_scheduler.h
index c250ea773491..0c8fe0461df9 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gpu_scheduler.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gpu_scheduler.h
@@ -51,7 +51,9 @@ static inline void xe_sched_tdr_queue_imm(struct xe_gpu_scheduler *sched)
static inline void xe_sched_resubmit_jobs(struct xe_gpu_scheduler *sched)
{
+ drm_sched_stop(&sched->base, NULL); /* remove completed jobs */
drm_sched_resubmit_jobs(&sched->base);
+ drm_sched_start(&sched->base, 0); /* re-add fence callback for pending jobs */
}
static inline bool
--
2.49.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] drm/xe/sched: stop re-submitting signalled jobs
2025-05-27 10:20 [PATCH v2] drm/xe/sched: stop re-submitting signalled jobs Matthew Auld
@ 2025-05-27 18:20 ` Matthew Brost
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Matthew Brost @ 2025-05-27 18:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Matthew Auld; +Cc: intel-xe, Thomas Hellström, William Tseng, stable
On Tue, May 27, 2025 at 11:20:00AM +0100, Matthew Auld wrote:
> Customer is reporting a really subtle issue where we get random DMAR
> faults, hangs and other nasties for kernel migration jobs when stressing
> stuff like s2idle/s3/s4. The explosions seems to happen somewhere
> after resuming the system with splats looking something like:
>
> PM: suspend exit
> rfkill: input handler disabled
> xe 0000:00:02.0: [drm] GT0: Engine reset: engine_class=bcs, logical_mask: 0x2, guc_id=0
> xe 0000:00:02.0: [drm] GT0: Timedout job: seqno=24496, lrc_seqno=24496, guc_id=0, flags=0x13 in no process [-1]
> xe 0000:00:02.0: [drm] GT0: Kernel-submitted job timed out
>
> The likely cause appears to be a race between suspend cancelling the
> worker that processes the free_job()'s, such that we still have pending
> jobs to be freed after the cancel. Following from this, on resume the
> pending_list will now contain at least one already complete job, but it
> looks like we call drm_sched_resubmit_jobs(), which will then call
> run_job() on everything still on the pending_list. But if the job was
> already complete, then all the resources tied to the job, like the bb
> itself, any memory that is being accessed, the iommu mappings etc. might
> be long gone since those are usually tied to the fence signalling.
>
> This scenario can be seen in ftrace when running a slightly modified
> xe_pm (kernel was only modified to inject artificial latency into
> free_job to make the race easier to hit):
>
> xe_sched_job_run: dev=0000:00:02.0, fence=0xffff888276cc8540, seqno=0, lrc_seqno=0, gt=0, guc_id=0, batch_addr=0x000000146910 ...
> xe_exec_queue_stop: dev=0000:00:02.0, 3:0x2, gt=0, width=1, guc_id=0, guc_state=0x0, flags=0x13
> xe_exec_queue_stop: dev=0000:00:02.0, 3:0x2, gt=0, width=1, guc_id=1, guc_state=0x0, flags=0x4
> xe_exec_queue_stop: dev=0000:00:02.0, 4:0x1, gt=1, width=1, guc_id=0, guc_state=0x0, flags=0x3
> xe_exec_queue_stop: dev=0000:00:02.0, 1:0x1, gt=1, width=1, guc_id=1, guc_state=0x0, flags=0x3
> xe_exec_queue_stop: dev=0000:00:02.0, 4:0x1, gt=1, width=1, guc_id=2, guc_state=0x0, flags=0x3
> xe_exec_queue_resubmit: dev=0000:00:02.0, 3:0x2, gt=0, width=1, guc_id=0, guc_state=0x0, flags=0x13
> xe_sched_job_run: dev=0000:00:02.0, fence=0xffff888276cc8540, seqno=0, lrc_seqno=0, gt=0, guc_id=0, batch_addr=0x000000146910 ...
> .....
> xe_exec_queue_memory_cat_error: dev=0000:00:02.0, 3:0x2, gt=0, width=1, guc_id=0, guc_state=0x3, flags=0x13
>
> So the job_run() is clearly triggered twice for the same job, even
> though the first must have already signalled to completion during
> suspend. We can also see a CAT error after the re-submit.
>
> To prevent this try to call xe_sched_stop() to forcefully remove
> anything on the pending_list that has already signalled, before we
> re-submit.
>
> v2:
> - Make sure to re-arm the fence callbacks with sched_start().
>
> Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/-/issues/4856
> Fixes: dd08ebf6c352 ("drm/xe: Introduce a new DRM driver for Intel GPUs")
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
> Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> Cc: William Tseng <william.tseng@intel.com>
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.8+
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gpu_scheduler.h | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gpu_scheduler.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gpu_scheduler.h
> index c250ea773491..0c8fe0461df9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gpu_scheduler.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gpu_scheduler.h
> @@ -51,7 +51,9 @@ static inline void xe_sched_tdr_queue_imm(struct xe_gpu_scheduler *sched)
>
> static inline void xe_sched_resubmit_jobs(struct xe_gpu_scheduler *sched)
> {
> + drm_sched_stop(&sched->base, NULL); /* remove completed jobs */
> drm_sched_resubmit_jobs(&sched->base);
drm_sched_resubmit_jobs is deprecated. IIRC it was suggested we should
replace drm_sched_resubmit_jobs with a loop which calls run_job on the
driver side. Can we do that and avoid calling run_job on jobs with
their fence signaled? I think that would preferred here.
Matt
> + drm_sched_start(&sched->base, 0); /* re-add fence callback for pending jobs */
> }
>
> static inline bool
> --
> 2.49.0
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-05-27 18:19 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-05-27 10:20 [PATCH v2] drm/xe/sched: stop re-submitting signalled jobs Matthew Auld
2025-05-27 18:20 ` Matthew Brost
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox