* [PATCH nft 1/2] netfilter: nf_conntrack_sip: fix missing expect put in REGISTER path
[not found] <20260506121618.578443-1-lixiasong1@huawei.com>
@ 2026-05-06 12:16 ` Li Xiasong
2026-05-06 13:33 ` Florian Westphal
2026-05-06 12:16 ` [PATCH nft 2/2] netfilter: nft_ct: fix missing expect put in obj eval Li Xiasong
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Li Xiasong @ 2026-05-06 12:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter-devel
Cc: stable, Pablo Neira Ayuso, Florian Westphal, Phil Sutter,
coreteam, yuehaibing, zhangchangzhong, weiyongjun1
process_register_request() allocates an expectation, but the !helper
error path returns NF_DROP without nf_ct_expect_put(exp).
Add the missing put to balance nf_ct_expect_alloc() on this path.
Fixes: e14575fa7529 ("netfilter: nf_conntrack: use rcu accessors where needed")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Li Xiasong <lixiasong1@huawei.com>
---
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_sip.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_sip.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_sip.c
index 1eb55907d470..a895bc836e1b 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_sip.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_sip.c
@@ -1377,8 +1377,10 @@ static int process_register_request(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int protoff,
saddr = &ct->tuplehash[!dir].tuple.src.u3;
helper = rcu_dereference(nfct_help(ct)->helper);
- if (!helper)
+ if (!helper) {
+ nf_ct_expect_put(exp);
return NF_DROP;
+ }
nf_ct_expect_init(exp, SIP_EXPECT_SIGNALLING, nf_ct_l3num(ct),
saddr, &daddr, proto, NULL, &port);
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH nft 2/2] netfilter: nft_ct: fix missing expect put in obj eval
[not found] <20260506121618.578443-1-lixiasong1@huawei.com>
2026-05-06 12:16 ` [PATCH nft 1/2] netfilter: nf_conntrack_sip: fix missing expect put in REGISTER path Li Xiasong
@ 2026-05-06 12:16 ` Li Xiasong
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Li Xiasong @ 2026-05-06 12:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter-devel
Cc: stable, Pablo Neira Ayuso, Florian Westphal, Phil Sutter,
coreteam, yuehaibing, zhangchangzhong, weiyongjun1
nft_ct_expect_obj_eval() allocates an expectation and may call
nf_ct_expect_related(), but never drops its local reference.
Add nf_ct_expect_put(exp) before return to balance allocation.
Fixes: 857b46027d6f ("netfilter: nft_ct: add ct expectations support")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Li Xiasong <lixiasong1@huawei.com>
---
net/netfilter/nft_ct.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nft_ct.c b/net/netfilter/nft_ct.c
index 60ee8d932fcb..fa2cc556331c 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nft_ct.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nft_ct.c
@@ -1334,6 +1334,8 @@ static void nft_ct_expect_obj_eval(struct nft_object *obj,
if (nf_ct_expect_related(exp, 0) != 0)
regs->verdict.code = NF_DROP;
+
+ nf_ct_expect_put(exp);
}
static const struct nla_policy nft_ct_expect_policy[NFTA_CT_EXPECT_MAX + 1] = {
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH nft 1/2] netfilter: nf_conntrack_sip: fix missing expect put in REGISTER path
2026-05-06 12:16 ` [PATCH nft 1/2] netfilter: nf_conntrack_sip: fix missing expect put in REGISTER path Li Xiasong
@ 2026-05-06 13:33 ` Florian Westphal
2026-05-06 14:50 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Florian Westphal @ 2026-05-06 13:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Li Xiasong
Cc: netfilter-devel, stable, Pablo Neira Ayuso, Phil Sutter, coreteam,
yuehaibing, zhangchangzhong, weiyongjun1
Li Xiasong <lixiasong1@huawei.com> wrote:
> process_register_request() allocates an expectation, but the !helper
> error path returns NF_DROP without nf_ct_expect_put(exp).
>
> Add the missing put to balance nf_ct_expect_alloc() on this path.
>
> Fixes: e14575fa7529 ("netfilter: nf_conntrack: use rcu accessors where needed")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Li Xiasong <lixiasong1@huawei.com>
> ---
> net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_sip.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_sip.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_sip.c
> index 1eb55907d470..a895bc836e1b 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_sip.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_sip.c
> @@ -1377,8 +1377,10 @@ static int process_register_request(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int protoff,
> saddr = &ct->tuplehash[!dir].tuple.src.u3;
>
> helper = rcu_dereference(nfct_help(ct)->helper);
> - if (!helper)
> + if (!helper) {
> + nf_ct_expect_put(exp);
> return NF_DROP;
> + }
I think it would be simpler to move the rcu defer to before
exp allocation instead.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH nft 1/2] netfilter: nf_conntrack_sip: fix missing expect put in REGISTER path
2026-05-06 13:33 ` Florian Westphal
@ 2026-05-06 14:50 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso @ 2026-05-06 14:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Florian Westphal
Cc: Li Xiasong, netfilter-devel, stable, Phil Sutter, coreteam,
yuehaibing, zhangchangzhong, weiyongjun1
On Wed, May 06, 2026 at 03:33:12PM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote:
> Li Xiasong <lixiasong1@huawei.com> wrote:
> > process_register_request() allocates an expectation, but the !helper
> > error path returns NF_DROP without nf_ct_expect_put(exp).
> >
> > Add the missing put to balance nf_ct_expect_alloc() on this path.
> >
> > Fixes: e14575fa7529 ("netfilter: nf_conntrack: use rcu accessors where needed")
> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Li Xiasong <lixiasong1@huawei.com>
> > ---
> > net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_sip.c | 4 +++-
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_sip.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_sip.c
> > index 1eb55907d470..a895bc836e1b 100644
> > --- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_sip.c
> > +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_sip.c
> > @@ -1377,8 +1377,10 @@ static int process_register_request(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int protoff,
> > saddr = &ct->tuplehash[!dir].tuple.src.u3;
> >
> > helper = rcu_dereference(nfct_help(ct)->helper);
> > - if (!helper)
> > + if (!helper) {
> > + nf_ct_expect_put(exp);
> > return NF_DROP;
> > + }
>
> I think it would be simpler to move the rcu defer to before
> exp allocation instead.
Agreed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-05-06 14:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20260506121618.578443-1-lixiasong1@huawei.com>
2026-05-06 12:16 ` [PATCH nft 1/2] netfilter: nf_conntrack_sip: fix missing expect put in REGISTER path Li Xiasong
2026-05-06 13:33 ` Florian Westphal
2026-05-06 14:50 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-05-06 12:16 ` [PATCH nft 2/2] netfilter: nft_ct: fix missing expect put in obj eval Li Xiasong
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox