Linux kernel -stable discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] drm/xe/vm: Reject invalid prefetch region for non-SVM VMA
@ 2026-07-10  2:17 Shuicheng Lin
  2026-07-13 21:01 ` Matthew Brost
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Shuicheng Lin @ 2026-07-10  2:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: intel-xe; +Cc: Shuicheng Lin, Himal Prasad Ghimiray, Matthew Brost, stable

DRM_XE_CONSULT_MEM_ADVISE_PREF_LOC (-1) is only valid on a
CPU-address-mirror (SVM) VMA. On a regular VMA the value is used as
an index into region_to_mem_type[], causing an out-of-bounds access:

  UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c:3260:28
  index 4294967295 is out of range for type 'u32 [3]'
  Call Trace:
   __ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds+0xa7/0xf0
   vm_bind_ioctl_ops_execute+0x9b0/0x9d0 [xe]
   xe_vm_bind_ioctl+0x19f1/0x1b10 [xe]

Three related changes:

- vm_bind_ioctl_ops_create(): For a non-CPU-address-mirror VMA, reject
  both DRM_XE_CONSULT_MEM_ADVISE_PREF_LOC and out-of-range prefetch
  regions with -EINVAL. This is the primary fix for the OOB.

- op_lock_and_prep(): Tighten the xe_assert() to
  'region < ARRAY_SIZE(region_to_mem_type)'. The
  DRM_XE_CONSULT_MEM_ADVISE_PREF_LOC exemption is no longer needed
  since the value is rejected earlier, and '<=' was an off-by-one
  bound (valid indices are 0..ARRAY_SIZE-1).

- xe_drm.h: Document the CPU-address-mirror constraint on the
  DRM_XE_CONSULT_MEM_ADVISE_PREF_LOC UAPI value.

Fixes: c1bb69a2e8e2 ("drm/xe/svm: Consult madvise preferred location in prefetch")
Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4.7
Cc: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Shuicheng Lin <shuicheng.lin@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c | 12 ++++++++++--
 include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h  |  4 +++-
 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
index 080c2fff0e95..9430b2be18e4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
@@ -2495,6 +2495,15 @@ vm_bind_ioctl_ops_create(struct xe_vm *vm, struct xe_vma_ops *vops,
 			u32 i;
 
 			if (!xe_vma_is_cpu_addr_mirror(vma)) {
+				if (XE_IOCTL_DBG(vm->xe,
+						 prefetch_region ==
+						 DRM_XE_CONSULT_MEM_ADVISE_PREF_LOC) ||
+				    XE_IOCTL_DBG(vm->xe,
+						 prefetch_region >=
+						 ARRAY_SIZE(region_to_mem_type))) {
+					err = -EINVAL;
+					goto unwind_prefetch_ops;
+				}
 				op->prefetch.region = prefetch_region;
 				break;
 			}
@@ -3236,8 +3245,7 @@ static int op_lock_and_prep(struct drm_exec *exec, struct xe_vm *vm,
 
 		if (!xe_vma_is_cpu_addr_mirror(vma)) {
 			region = op->prefetch.region;
-			xe_assert(vm->xe, region == DRM_XE_CONSULT_MEM_ADVISE_PREF_LOC ||
-				  region <= ARRAY_SIZE(region_to_mem_type));
+			xe_assert(vm->xe, region < ARRAY_SIZE(region_to_mem_type));
 		}
 
 		/*
diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h b/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h
index 509202a7b13e..e159c44e380a 100644
--- a/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h
+++ b/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h
@@ -1075,7 +1075,9 @@ struct drm_xe_vm_destroy {
  *
  * The @prefetch_mem_region_instance for %DRM_XE_VM_BIND_OP_PREFETCH can also be:
  *  - %DRM_XE_CONSULT_MEM_ADVISE_PREF_LOC, which ensures prefetching occurs in
- *    the memory region advised by madvise.
+ *    the memory region advised by madvise. Only valid when the target VMA
+ *    was created with %DRM_XE_VM_BIND_FLAG_CPU_ADDR_MIRROR; rejected with
+ *    -EINVAL otherwise.
  */
 struct drm_xe_vm_bind_op {
 	/** @extensions: Pointer to the first extension struct, if any */
-- 
2.43.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] drm/xe/vm: Reject invalid prefetch region for non-SVM VMA
  2026-07-10  2:17 [PATCH] drm/xe/vm: Reject invalid prefetch region for non-SVM VMA Shuicheng Lin
@ 2026-07-13 21:01 ` Matthew Brost
  2026-07-14  3:32   ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Matthew Brost @ 2026-07-13 21:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Shuicheng Lin; +Cc: intel-xe, Himal Prasad Ghimiray, stable

On Fri, Jul 10, 2026 at 02:17:00AM +0000, Shuicheng Lin wrote:
> DRM_XE_CONSULT_MEM_ADVISE_PREF_LOC (-1) is only valid on a
> CPU-address-mirror (SVM) VMA. On a regular VMA the value is used as
> an index into region_to_mem_type[], causing an out-of-bounds access:
> 
>   UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c:3260:28
>   index 4294967295 is out of range for type 'u32 [3]'
>   Call Trace:
>    __ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds+0xa7/0xf0
>    vm_bind_ioctl_ops_execute+0x9b0/0x9d0 [xe]
>    xe_vm_bind_ioctl+0x19f1/0x1b10 [xe]
> 
> Three related changes:
> 
> - vm_bind_ioctl_ops_create(): For a non-CPU-address-mirror VMA, reject
>   both DRM_XE_CONSULT_MEM_ADVISE_PREF_LOC and out-of-range prefetch
>   regions with -EINVAL. This is the primary fix for the OOB.
> 
> - op_lock_and_prep(): Tighten the xe_assert() to
>   'region < ARRAY_SIZE(region_to_mem_type)'. The
>   DRM_XE_CONSULT_MEM_ADVISE_PREF_LOC exemption is no longer needed
>   since the value is rejected earlier, and '<=' was an off-by-one
>   bound (valid indices are 0..ARRAY_SIZE-1).
> 
> - xe_drm.h: Document the CPU-address-mirror constraint on the
>   DRM_XE_CONSULT_MEM_ADVISE_PREF_LOC UAPI value.
> 
> Fixes: c1bb69a2e8e2 ("drm/xe/svm: Consult madvise preferred location in prefetch")
> Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4.7
> Cc: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>

I think Himal at least fixed the memory safety problem later in the
pipeline here [1]. I'm unsure if he merged that one yet, but I'm
inclined to say this is a better solution.

What do you think Himal?

Matt

[1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/168913/

> Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Shuicheng Lin <shuicheng.lin@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c | 12 ++++++++++--
>  include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h  |  4 +++-
>  2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
> index 080c2fff0e95..9430b2be18e4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
> @@ -2495,6 +2495,15 @@ vm_bind_ioctl_ops_create(struct xe_vm *vm, struct xe_vma_ops *vops,
>  			u32 i;
>  
>  			if (!xe_vma_is_cpu_addr_mirror(vma)) {
> +				if (XE_IOCTL_DBG(vm->xe,
> +						 prefetch_region ==
> +						 DRM_XE_CONSULT_MEM_ADVISE_PREF_LOC) ||
> +				    XE_IOCTL_DBG(vm->xe,
> +						 prefetch_region >=
> +						 ARRAY_SIZE(region_to_mem_type))) {
> +					err = -EINVAL;
> +					goto unwind_prefetch_ops;
> +				}
>  				op->prefetch.region = prefetch_region;
>  				break;
>  			}
> @@ -3236,8 +3245,7 @@ static int op_lock_and_prep(struct drm_exec *exec, struct xe_vm *vm,
>  
>  		if (!xe_vma_is_cpu_addr_mirror(vma)) {
>  			region = op->prefetch.region;
> -			xe_assert(vm->xe, region == DRM_XE_CONSULT_MEM_ADVISE_PREF_LOC ||
> -				  region <= ARRAY_SIZE(region_to_mem_type));
> +			xe_assert(vm->xe, region < ARRAY_SIZE(region_to_mem_type));
>  		}
>  
>  		/*
> diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h b/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h
> index 509202a7b13e..e159c44e380a 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h
> @@ -1075,7 +1075,9 @@ struct drm_xe_vm_destroy {
>   *
>   * The @prefetch_mem_region_instance for %DRM_XE_VM_BIND_OP_PREFETCH can also be:
>   *  - %DRM_XE_CONSULT_MEM_ADVISE_PREF_LOC, which ensures prefetching occurs in
> - *    the memory region advised by madvise.
> + *    the memory region advised by madvise. Only valid when the target VMA
> + *    was created with %DRM_XE_VM_BIND_FLAG_CPU_ADDR_MIRROR; rejected with
> + *    -EINVAL otherwise.
>   */
>  struct drm_xe_vm_bind_op {
>  	/** @extensions: Pointer to the first extension struct, if any */
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] drm/xe/vm: Reject invalid prefetch region for non-SVM VMA
  2026-07-13 21:01 ` Matthew Brost
@ 2026-07-14  3:32   ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
  2026-07-14  6:20     ` Matthew Brost
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ghimiray, Himal Prasad @ 2026-07-14  3:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Matthew Brost, Shuicheng Lin; +Cc: intel-xe, stable



On 14-07-2026 02:31, Matthew Brost wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2026 at 02:17:00AM +0000, Shuicheng Lin wrote:
>> DRM_XE_CONSULT_MEM_ADVISE_PREF_LOC (-1) is only valid on a
>> CPU-address-mirror (SVM) VMA. On a regular VMA the value is used as
>> an index into region_to_mem_type[], causing an out-of-bounds access:
>>
>>    UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c:3260:28
>>    index 4294967295 is out of range for type 'u32 [3]'
>>    Call Trace:
>>     __ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds+0xa7/0xf0
>>     vm_bind_ioctl_ops_execute+0x9b0/0x9d0 [xe]
>>     xe_vm_bind_ioctl+0x19f1/0x1b10 [xe]
>>
>> Three related changes:
>>
>> - vm_bind_ioctl_ops_create(): For a non-CPU-address-mirror VMA, reject
>>    both DRM_XE_CONSULT_MEM_ADVISE_PREF_LOC and out-of-range prefetch
>>    regions with -EINVAL. This is the primary fix for the OOB.
>>
>> - op_lock_and_prep(): Tighten the xe_assert() to
>>    'region < ARRAY_SIZE(region_to_mem_type)'. The
>>    DRM_XE_CONSULT_MEM_ADVISE_PREF_LOC exemption is no longer needed
>>    since the value is rejected earlier, and '<=' was an off-by-one
>>    bound (valid indices are 0..ARRAY_SIZE-1).
>>
>> - xe_drm.h: Document the CPU-address-mirror constraint on the
>>    DRM_XE_CONSULT_MEM_ADVISE_PREF_LOC UAPI value.
>>
>> Fixes: c1bb69a2e8e2 ("drm/xe/svm: Consult madvise preferred location in prefetch")
>> Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4.7
>> Cc: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
> 
> I think Himal at least fixed the memory safety problem later in the
> pipeline here [1]. I'm unsure if he merged that one yet, but I'm
> inclined to say this is a better solution.
> 
> What do you think Himal?

Hi Matt,

IMO -EINVAL isn't the right behaviour here. Rejecting fails the whole 
ioctl and prefetches nothing — including the SVM VMAs in the range that 
were always valid.

AFAIU prefetching a range that covers mixed VMAs is a perfectly valid 
use case. Today:

region 0 (system) works
region 1 (devmem) works
for -1 (CONSULT_MEM_ADVISE_PREF_LOC) we should prefetch each SVM VMA to 
its preferred location, and for a BO VMA try its preferred location 
(which is effectively always local devmem); if the BO has no VRAM 
placement, fall back to PL_TT — but no ioctl failure.

If we do decide -EINVAL is the right way, then we'd effectively be 
telling UMD that range-based prefetch only works with system/devmem, and 
that a CONSULT_MEM_ADVISE_PREF_LOC prefetch range must not contain any 
BO VMAs. That's a much more awkward contract to put on UMD, since a 
range can span both VMA types, so I'm not aligned with the EINVAL approach.

Patch [1] is not merged yet, once you confirm will go ahead with it.

BR
Himal


> 
> Matt
> 
> [1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/168913/
> 
>> Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Shuicheng Lin <shuicheng.lin@intel.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c | 12 ++++++++++--
>>   include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h  |  4 +++-
>>   2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
>> index 080c2fff0e95..9430b2be18e4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
>> @@ -2495,6 +2495,15 @@ vm_bind_ioctl_ops_create(struct xe_vm *vm, struct xe_vma_ops *vops,
>>   			u32 i;
>>   
>>   			if (!xe_vma_is_cpu_addr_mirror(vma)) {
>> +				if (XE_IOCTL_DBG(vm->xe,
>> +						 prefetch_region ==
>> +						 DRM_XE_CONSULT_MEM_ADVISE_PREF_LOC) ||
>> +				    XE_IOCTL_DBG(vm->xe,
>> +						 prefetch_region >=
>> +						 ARRAY_SIZE(region_to_mem_type))) {
>> +					err = -EINVAL;
>> +					goto unwind_prefetch_ops;
>> +				}
>>   				op->prefetch.region = prefetch_region;
>>   				break;
>>   			}
>> @@ -3236,8 +3245,7 @@ static int op_lock_and_prep(struct drm_exec *exec, struct xe_vm *vm,
>>   
>>   		if (!xe_vma_is_cpu_addr_mirror(vma)) {
>>   			region = op->prefetch.region;
>> -			xe_assert(vm->xe, region == DRM_XE_CONSULT_MEM_ADVISE_PREF_LOC ||
>> -				  region <= ARRAY_SIZE(region_to_mem_type));
>> +			xe_assert(vm->xe, region < ARRAY_SIZE(region_to_mem_type));
>>   		}
>>   
>>   		/*
>> diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h b/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h
>> index 509202a7b13e..e159c44e380a 100644
>> --- a/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h
>> +++ b/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h
>> @@ -1075,7 +1075,9 @@ struct drm_xe_vm_destroy {
>>    *
>>    * The @prefetch_mem_region_instance for %DRM_XE_VM_BIND_OP_PREFETCH can also be:
>>    *  - %DRM_XE_CONSULT_MEM_ADVISE_PREF_LOC, which ensures prefetching occurs in
>> - *    the memory region advised by madvise.
>> + *    the memory region advised by madvise. Only valid when the target VMA
>> + *    was created with %DRM_XE_VM_BIND_FLAG_CPU_ADDR_MIRROR; rejected with
>> + *    -EINVAL otherwise.
>>    */
>>   struct drm_xe_vm_bind_op {
>>   	/** @extensions: Pointer to the first extension struct, if any */
>> -- 
>> 2.43.0
>>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] drm/xe/vm: Reject invalid prefetch region for non-SVM VMA
  2026-07-14  3:32   ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
@ 2026-07-14  6:20     ` Matthew Brost
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Matthew Brost @ 2026-07-14  6:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ghimiray, Himal Prasad; +Cc: Shuicheng Lin, intel-xe, stable

On Tue, Jul 14, 2026 at 09:02:52AM +0530, Ghimiray, Himal Prasad wrote:
> 
> 
> On 14-07-2026 02:31, Matthew Brost wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 10, 2026 at 02:17:00AM +0000, Shuicheng Lin wrote:
> > > DRM_XE_CONSULT_MEM_ADVISE_PREF_LOC (-1) is only valid on a
> > > CPU-address-mirror (SVM) VMA. On a regular VMA the value is used as
> > > an index into region_to_mem_type[], causing an out-of-bounds access:
> > > 
> > >    UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c:3260:28
> > >    index 4294967295 is out of range for type 'u32 [3]'
> > >    Call Trace:
> > >     __ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds+0xa7/0xf0
> > >     vm_bind_ioctl_ops_execute+0x9b0/0x9d0 [xe]
> > >     xe_vm_bind_ioctl+0x19f1/0x1b10 [xe]
> > > 
> > > Three related changes:
> > > 
> > > - vm_bind_ioctl_ops_create(): For a non-CPU-address-mirror VMA, reject
> > >    both DRM_XE_CONSULT_MEM_ADVISE_PREF_LOC and out-of-range prefetch
> > >    regions with -EINVAL. This is the primary fix for the OOB.
> > > 
> > > - op_lock_and_prep(): Tighten the xe_assert() to
> > >    'region < ARRAY_SIZE(region_to_mem_type)'. The
> > >    DRM_XE_CONSULT_MEM_ADVISE_PREF_LOC exemption is no longer needed
> > >    since the value is rejected earlier, and '<=' was an off-by-one
> > >    bound (valid indices are 0..ARRAY_SIZE-1).
> > > 
> > > - xe_drm.h: Document the CPU-address-mirror constraint on the
> > >    DRM_XE_CONSULT_MEM_ADVISE_PREF_LOC UAPI value.
> > > 
> > > Fixes: c1bb69a2e8e2 ("drm/xe/svm: Consult madvise preferred location in prefetch")
> > > Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4.7
> > > Cc: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
> > 
> > I think Himal at least fixed the memory safety problem later in the
> > pipeline here [1]. I'm unsure if he merged that one yet, but I'm
> > inclined to say this is a better solution.
> > 
> > What do you think Himal?
> 
> Hi Matt,
> 
> IMO -EINVAL isn't the right behaviour here. Rejecting fails the whole ioctl
> and prefetches nothing — including the SVM VMAs in the range that were
> always valid.
> 
> AFAIU prefetching a range that covers mixed VMAs is a perfectly valid use
> case. Today:
> 
> region 0 (system) works
> region 1 (devmem) works
> for -1 (CONSULT_MEM_ADVISE_PREF_LOC) we should prefetch each SVM VMA to its
> preferred location, and for a BO VMA try its preferred location (which is
> effectively always local devmem); if the BO has no VRAM placement, fall back
> to PL_TT — but no ioctl failure.
> 
> If we do decide -EINVAL is the right way, then we'd effectively be telling
> UMD that range-based prefetch only works with system/devmem, and that a
> CONSULT_MEM_ADVISE_PREF_LOC prefetch range must not contain any BO VMAs.
> That's a much more awkward contract to put on UMD, since a range can span
> both VMA types, so I'm not aligned with the EINVAL approach.
> 

Thanks for input here, I'm going to have to agree with Himal's line of
thinking here.

> Patch [1] is not merged yet, once you confirm will go ahead with it.
>

Go ahead merge.

Matt

> BR
> Himal
> 
> 
> > 
> > Matt
> > 
> > [1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/168913/
> > 
> > > Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > > Signed-off-by: Shuicheng Lin <shuicheng.lin@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >   drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c | 12 ++++++++++--
> > >   include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h  |  4 +++-
> > >   2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
> > > index 080c2fff0e95..9430b2be18e4 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
> > > @@ -2495,6 +2495,15 @@ vm_bind_ioctl_ops_create(struct xe_vm *vm, struct xe_vma_ops *vops,
> > >   			u32 i;
> > >   			if (!xe_vma_is_cpu_addr_mirror(vma)) {
> > > +				if (XE_IOCTL_DBG(vm->xe,
> > > +						 prefetch_region ==
> > > +						 DRM_XE_CONSULT_MEM_ADVISE_PREF_LOC) ||
> > > +				    XE_IOCTL_DBG(vm->xe,
> > > +						 prefetch_region >=
> > > +						 ARRAY_SIZE(region_to_mem_type))) {
> > > +					err = -EINVAL;
> > > +					goto unwind_prefetch_ops;
> > > +				}
> > >   				op->prefetch.region = prefetch_region;
> > >   				break;
> > >   			}
> > > @@ -3236,8 +3245,7 @@ static int op_lock_and_prep(struct drm_exec *exec, struct xe_vm *vm,
> > >   		if (!xe_vma_is_cpu_addr_mirror(vma)) {
> > >   			region = op->prefetch.region;
> > > -			xe_assert(vm->xe, region == DRM_XE_CONSULT_MEM_ADVISE_PREF_LOC ||
> > > -				  region <= ARRAY_SIZE(region_to_mem_type));
> > > +			xe_assert(vm->xe, region < ARRAY_SIZE(region_to_mem_type));
> > >   		}
> > >   		/*
> > > diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h b/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h
> > > index 509202a7b13e..e159c44e380a 100644
> > > --- a/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h
> > > +++ b/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h
> > > @@ -1075,7 +1075,9 @@ struct drm_xe_vm_destroy {
> > >    *
> > >    * The @prefetch_mem_region_instance for %DRM_XE_VM_BIND_OP_PREFETCH can also be:
> > >    *  - %DRM_XE_CONSULT_MEM_ADVISE_PREF_LOC, which ensures prefetching occurs in
> > > - *    the memory region advised by madvise.
> > > + *    the memory region advised by madvise. Only valid when the target VMA
> > > + *    was created with %DRM_XE_VM_BIND_FLAG_CPU_ADDR_MIRROR; rejected with
> > > + *    -EINVAL otherwise.
> > >    */
> > >   struct drm_xe_vm_bind_op {
> > >   	/** @extensions: Pointer to the first extension struct, if any */
> > > -- 
> > > 2.43.0
> > > 
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-07-14  6:20 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-07-10  2:17 [PATCH] drm/xe/vm: Reject invalid prefetch region for non-SVM VMA Shuicheng Lin
2026-07-13 21:01 ` Matthew Brost
2026-07-14  3:32   ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2026-07-14  6:20     ` Matthew Brost

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox