* [PATCH] drm/xe/vm: Reject invalid prefetch region for non-SVM VMA
@ 2026-07-10 2:17 Shuicheng Lin
2026-07-13 21:01 ` Matthew Brost
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Shuicheng Lin @ 2026-07-10 2:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-xe; +Cc: Shuicheng Lin, Himal Prasad Ghimiray, Matthew Brost, stable
DRM_XE_CONSULT_MEM_ADVISE_PREF_LOC (-1) is only valid on a
CPU-address-mirror (SVM) VMA. On a regular VMA the value is used as
an index into region_to_mem_type[], causing an out-of-bounds access:
UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c:3260:28
index 4294967295 is out of range for type 'u32 [3]'
Call Trace:
__ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds+0xa7/0xf0
vm_bind_ioctl_ops_execute+0x9b0/0x9d0 [xe]
xe_vm_bind_ioctl+0x19f1/0x1b10 [xe]
Three related changes:
- vm_bind_ioctl_ops_create(): For a non-CPU-address-mirror VMA, reject
both DRM_XE_CONSULT_MEM_ADVISE_PREF_LOC and out-of-range prefetch
regions with -EINVAL. This is the primary fix for the OOB.
- op_lock_and_prep(): Tighten the xe_assert() to
'region < ARRAY_SIZE(region_to_mem_type)'. The
DRM_XE_CONSULT_MEM_ADVISE_PREF_LOC exemption is no longer needed
since the value is rejected earlier, and '<=' was an off-by-one
bound (valid indices are 0..ARRAY_SIZE-1).
- xe_drm.h: Document the CPU-address-mirror constraint on the
DRM_XE_CONSULT_MEM_ADVISE_PREF_LOC UAPI value.
Fixes: c1bb69a2e8e2 ("drm/xe/svm: Consult madvise preferred location in prefetch")
Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4.7
Cc: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Shuicheng Lin <shuicheng.lin@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c | 12 ++++++++++--
include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h | 4 +++-
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
index 080c2fff0e95..9430b2be18e4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
@@ -2495,6 +2495,15 @@ vm_bind_ioctl_ops_create(struct xe_vm *vm, struct xe_vma_ops *vops,
u32 i;
if (!xe_vma_is_cpu_addr_mirror(vma)) {
+ if (XE_IOCTL_DBG(vm->xe,
+ prefetch_region ==
+ DRM_XE_CONSULT_MEM_ADVISE_PREF_LOC) ||
+ XE_IOCTL_DBG(vm->xe,
+ prefetch_region >=
+ ARRAY_SIZE(region_to_mem_type))) {
+ err = -EINVAL;
+ goto unwind_prefetch_ops;
+ }
op->prefetch.region = prefetch_region;
break;
}
@@ -3236,8 +3245,7 @@ static int op_lock_and_prep(struct drm_exec *exec, struct xe_vm *vm,
if (!xe_vma_is_cpu_addr_mirror(vma)) {
region = op->prefetch.region;
- xe_assert(vm->xe, region == DRM_XE_CONSULT_MEM_ADVISE_PREF_LOC ||
- region <= ARRAY_SIZE(region_to_mem_type));
+ xe_assert(vm->xe, region < ARRAY_SIZE(region_to_mem_type));
}
/*
diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h b/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h
index 509202a7b13e..e159c44e380a 100644
--- a/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h
+++ b/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h
@@ -1075,7 +1075,9 @@ struct drm_xe_vm_destroy {
*
* The @prefetch_mem_region_instance for %DRM_XE_VM_BIND_OP_PREFETCH can also be:
* - %DRM_XE_CONSULT_MEM_ADVISE_PREF_LOC, which ensures prefetching occurs in
- * the memory region advised by madvise.
+ * the memory region advised by madvise. Only valid when the target VMA
+ * was created with %DRM_XE_VM_BIND_FLAG_CPU_ADDR_MIRROR; rejected with
+ * -EINVAL otherwise.
*/
struct drm_xe_vm_bind_op {
/** @extensions: Pointer to the first extension struct, if any */
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/xe/vm: Reject invalid prefetch region for non-SVM VMA
2026-07-10 2:17 [PATCH] drm/xe/vm: Reject invalid prefetch region for non-SVM VMA Shuicheng Lin
@ 2026-07-13 21:01 ` Matthew Brost
2026-07-14 3:32 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Matthew Brost @ 2026-07-13 21:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Shuicheng Lin; +Cc: intel-xe, Himal Prasad Ghimiray, stable
On Fri, Jul 10, 2026 at 02:17:00AM +0000, Shuicheng Lin wrote:
> DRM_XE_CONSULT_MEM_ADVISE_PREF_LOC (-1) is only valid on a
> CPU-address-mirror (SVM) VMA. On a regular VMA the value is used as
> an index into region_to_mem_type[], causing an out-of-bounds access:
>
> UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c:3260:28
> index 4294967295 is out of range for type 'u32 [3]'
> Call Trace:
> __ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds+0xa7/0xf0
> vm_bind_ioctl_ops_execute+0x9b0/0x9d0 [xe]
> xe_vm_bind_ioctl+0x19f1/0x1b10 [xe]
>
> Three related changes:
>
> - vm_bind_ioctl_ops_create(): For a non-CPU-address-mirror VMA, reject
> both DRM_XE_CONSULT_MEM_ADVISE_PREF_LOC and out-of-range prefetch
> regions with -EINVAL. This is the primary fix for the OOB.
>
> - op_lock_and_prep(): Tighten the xe_assert() to
> 'region < ARRAY_SIZE(region_to_mem_type)'. The
> DRM_XE_CONSULT_MEM_ADVISE_PREF_LOC exemption is no longer needed
> since the value is rejected earlier, and '<=' was an off-by-one
> bound (valid indices are 0..ARRAY_SIZE-1).
>
> - xe_drm.h: Document the CPU-address-mirror constraint on the
> DRM_XE_CONSULT_MEM_ADVISE_PREF_LOC UAPI value.
>
> Fixes: c1bb69a2e8e2 ("drm/xe/svm: Consult madvise preferred location in prefetch")
> Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4.7
> Cc: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
I think Himal at least fixed the memory safety problem later in the
pipeline here [1]. I'm unsure if he merged that one yet, but I'm
inclined to say this is a better solution.
What do you think Himal?
Matt
[1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/168913/
> Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Shuicheng Lin <shuicheng.lin@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c | 12 ++++++++++--
> include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h | 4 +++-
> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
> index 080c2fff0e95..9430b2be18e4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
> @@ -2495,6 +2495,15 @@ vm_bind_ioctl_ops_create(struct xe_vm *vm, struct xe_vma_ops *vops,
> u32 i;
>
> if (!xe_vma_is_cpu_addr_mirror(vma)) {
> + if (XE_IOCTL_DBG(vm->xe,
> + prefetch_region ==
> + DRM_XE_CONSULT_MEM_ADVISE_PREF_LOC) ||
> + XE_IOCTL_DBG(vm->xe,
> + prefetch_region >=
> + ARRAY_SIZE(region_to_mem_type))) {
> + err = -EINVAL;
> + goto unwind_prefetch_ops;
> + }
> op->prefetch.region = prefetch_region;
> break;
> }
> @@ -3236,8 +3245,7 @@ static int op_lock_and_prep(struct drm_exec *exec, struct xe_vm *vm,
>
> if (!xe_vma_is_cpu_addr_mirror(vma)) {
> region = op->prefetch.region;
> - xe_assert(vm->xe, region == DRM_XE_CONSULT_MEM_ADVISE_PREF_LOC ||
> - region <= ARRAY_SIZE(region_to_mem_type));
> + xe_assert(vm->xe, region < ARRAY_SIZE(region_to_mem_type));
> }
>
> /*
> diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h b/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h
> index 509202a7b13e..e159c44e380a 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h
> @@ -1075,7 +1075,9 @@ struct drm_xe_vm_destroy {
> *
> * The @prefetch_mem_region_instance for %DRM_XE_VM_BIND_OP_PREFETCH can also be:
> * - %DRM_XE_CONSULT_MEM_ADVISE_PREF_LOC, which ensures prefetching occurs in
> - * the memory region advised by madvise.
> + * the memory region advised by madvise. Only valid when the target VMA
> + * was created with %DRM_XE_VM_BIND_FLAG_CPU_ADDR_MIRROR; rejected with
> + * -EINVAL otherwise.
> */
> struct drm_xe_vm_bind_op {
> /** @extensions: Pointer to the first extension struct, if any */
> --
> 2.43.0
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/xe/vm: Reject invalid prefetch region for non-SVM VMA
2026-07-13 21:01 ` Matthew Brost
@ 2026-07-14 3:32 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2026-07-14 6:20 ` Matthew Brost
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ghimiray, Himal Prasad @ 2026-07-14 3:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Matthew Brost, Shuicheng Lin; +Cc: intel-xe, stable
On 14-07-2026 02:31, Matthew Brost wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2026 at 02:17:00AM +0000, Shuicheng Lin wrote:
>> DRM_XE_CONSULT_MEM_ADVISE_PREF_LOC (-1) is only valid on a
>> CPU-address-mirror (SVM) VMA. On a regular VMA the value is used as
>> an index into region_to_mem_type[], causing an out-of-bounds access:
>>
>> UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c:3260:28
>> index 4294967295 is out of range for type 'u32 [3]'
>> Call Trace:
>> __ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds+0xa7/0xf0
>> vm_bind_ioctl_ops_execute+0x9b0/0x9d0 [xe]
>> xe_vm_bind_ioctl+0x19f1/0x1b10 [xe]
>>
>> Three related changes:
>>
>> - vm_bind_ioctl_ops_create(): For a non-CPU-address-mirror VMA, reject
>> both DRM_XE_CONSULT_MEM_ADVISE_PREF_LOC and out-of-range prefetch
>> regions with -EINVAL. This is the primary fix for the OOB.
>>
>> - op_lock_and_prep(): Tighten the xe_assert() to
>> 'region < ARRAY_SIZE(region_to_mem_type)'. The
>> DRM_XE_CONSULT_MEM_ADVISE_PREF_LOC exemption is no longer needed
>> since the value is rejected earlier, and '<=' was an off-by-one
>> bound (valid indices are 0..ARRAY_SIZE-1).
>>
>> - xe_drm.h: Document the CPU-address-mirror constraint on the
>> DRM_XE_CONSULT_MEM_ADVISE_PREF_LOC UAPI value.
>>
>> Fixes: c1bb69a2e8e2 ("drm/xe/svm: Consult madvise preferred location in prefetch")
>> Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4.7
>> Cc: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
>
> I think Himal at least fixed the memory safety problem later in the
> pipeline here [1]. I'm unsure if he merged that one yet, but I'm
> inclined to say this is a better solution.
>
> What do you think Himal?
Hi Matt,
IMO -EINVAL isn't the right behaviour here. Rejecting fails the whole
ioctl and prefetches nothing — including the SVM VMAs in the range that
were always valid.
AFAIU prefetching a range that covers mixed VMAs is a perfectly valid
use case. Today:
region 0 (system) works
region 1 (devmem) works
for -1 (CONSULT_MEM_ADVISE_PREF_LOC) we should prefetch each SVM VMA to
its preferred location, and for a BO VMA try its preferred location
(which is effectively always local devmem); if the BO has no VRAM
placement, fall back to PL_TT — but no ioctl failure.
If we do decide -EINVAL is the right way, then we'd effectively be
telling UMD that range-based prefetch only works with system/devmem, and
that a CONSULT_MEM_ADVISE_PREF_LOC prefetch range must not contain any
BO VMAs. That's a much more awkward contract to put on UMD, since a
range can span both VMA types, so I'm not aligned with the EINVAL approach.
Patch [1] is not merged yet, once you confirm will go ahead with it.
BR
Himal
>
> Matt
>
> [1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/168913/
>
>> Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Shuicheng Lin <shuicheng.lin@intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c | 12 ++++++++++--
>> include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h | 4 +++-
>> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
>> index 080c2fff0e95..9430b2be18e4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
>> @@ -2495,6 +2495,15 @@ vm_bind_ioctl_ops_create(struct xe_vm *vm, struct xe_vma_ops *vops,
>> u32 i;
>>
>> if (!xe_vma_is_cpu_addr_mirror(vma)) {
>> + if (XE_IOCTL_DBG(vm->xe,
>> + prefetch_region ==
>> + DRM_XE_CONSULT_MEM_ADVISE_PREF_LOC) ||
>> + XE_IOCTL_DBG(vm->xe,
>> + prefetch_region >=
>> + ARRAY_SIZE(region_to_mem_type))) {
>> + err = -EINVAL;
>> + goto unwind_prefetch_ops;
>> + }
>> op->prefetch.region = prefetch_region;
>> break;
>> }
>> @@ -3236,8 +3245,7 @@ static int op_lock_and_prep(struct drm_exec *exec, struct xe_vm *vm,
>>
>> if (!xe_vma_is_cpu_addr_mirror(vma)) {
>> region = op->prefetch.region;
>> - xe_assert(vm->xe, region == DRM_XE_CONSULT_MEM_ADVISE_PREF_LOC ||
>> - region <= ARRAY_SIZE(region_to_mem_type));
>> + xe_assert(vm->xe, region < ARRAY_SIZE(region_to_mem_type));
>> }
>>
>> /*
>> diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h b/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h
>> index 509202a7b13e..e159c44e380a 100644
>> --- a/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h
>> +++ b/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h
>> @@ -1075,7 +1075,9 @@ struct drm_xe_vm_destroy {
>> *
>> * The @prefetch_mem_region_instance for %DRM_XE_VM_BIND_OP_PREFETCH can also be:
>> * - %DRM_XE_CONSULT_MEM_ADVISE_PREF_LOC, which ensures prefetching occurs in
>> - * the memory region advised by madvise.
>> + * the memory region advised by madvise. Only valid when the target VMA
>> + * was created with %DRM_XE_VM_BIND_FLAG_CPU_ADDR_MIRROR; rejected with
>> + * -EINVAL otherwise.
>> */
>> struct drm_xe_vm_bind_op {
>> /** @extensions: Pointer to the first extension struct, if any */
>> --
>> 2.43.0
>>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/xe/vm: Reject invalid prefetch region for non-SVM VMA
2026-07-14 3:32 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
@ 2026-07-14 6:20 ` Matthew Brost
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Matthew Brost @ 2026-07-14 6:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ghimiray, Himal Prasad; +Cc: Shuicheng Lin, intel-xe, stable
On Tue, Jul 14, 2026 at 09:02:52AM +0530, Ghimiray, Himal Prasad wrote:
>
>
> On 14-07-2026 02:31, Matthew Brost wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 10, 2026 at 02:17:00AM +0000, Shuicheng Lin wrote:
> > > DRM_XE_CONSULT_MEM_ADVISE_PREF_LOC (-1) is only valid on a
> > > CPU-address-mirror (SVM) VMA. On a regular VMA the value is used as
> > > an index into region_to_mem_type[], causing an out-of-bounds access:
> > >
> > > UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c:3260:28
> > > index 4294967295 is out of range for type 'u32 [3]'
> > > Call Trace:
> > > __ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds+0xa7/0xf0
> > > vm_bind_ioctl_ops_execute+0x9b0/0x9d0 [xe]
> > > xe_vm_bind_ioctl+0x19f1/0x1b10 [xe]
> > >
> > > Three related changes:
> > >
> > > - vm_bind_ioctl_ops_create(): For a non-CPU-address-mirror VMA, reject
> > > both DRM_XE_CONSULT_MEM_ADVISE_PREF_LOC and out-of-range prefetch
> > > regions with -EINVAL. This is the primary fix for the OOB.
> > >
> > > - op_lock_and_prep(): Tighten the xe_assert() to
> > > 'region < ARRAY_SIZE(region_to_mem_type)'. The
> > > DRM_XE_CONSULT_MEM_ADVISE_PREF_LOC exemption is no longer needed
> > > since the value is rejected earlier, and '<=' was an off-by-one
> > > bound (valid indices are 0..ARRAY_SIZE-1).
> > >
> > > - xe_drm.h: Document the CPU-address-mirror constraint on the
> > > DRM_XE_CONSULT_MEM_ADVISE_PREF_LOC UAPI value.
> > >
> > > Fixes: c1bb69a2e8e2 ("drm/xe/svm: Consult madvise preferred location in prefetch")
> > > Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4.7
> > > Cc: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
> >
> > I think Himal at least fixed the memory safety problem later in the
> > pipeline here [1]. I'm unsure if he merged that one yet, but I'm
> > inclined to say this is a better solution.
> >
> > What do you think Himal?
>
> Hi Matt,
>
> IMO -EINVAL isn't the right behaviour here. Rejecting fails the whole ioctl
> and prefetches nothing — including the SVM VMAs in the range that were
> always valid.
>
> AFAIU prefetching a range that covers mixed VMAs is a perfectly valid use
> case. Today:
>
> region 0 (system) works
> region 1 (devmem) works
> for -1 (CONSULT_MEM_ADVISE_PREF_LOC) we should prefetch each SVM VMA to its
> preferred location, and for a BO VMA try its preferred location (which is
> effectively always local devmem); if the BO has no VRAM placement, fall back
> to PL_TT — but no ioctl failure.
>
> If we do decide -EINVAL is the right way, then we'd effectively be telling
> UMD that range-based prefetch only works with system/devmem, and that a
> CONSULT_MEM_ADVISE_PREF_LOC prefetch range must not contain any BO VMAs.
> That's a much more awkward contract to put on UMD, since a range can span
> both VMA types, so I'm not aligned with the EINVAL approach.
>
Thanks for input here, I'm going to have to agree with Himal's line of
thinking here.
> Patch [1] is not merged yet, once you confirm will go ahead with it.
>
Go ahead merge.
Matt
> BR
> Himal
>
>
> >
> > Matt
> >
> > [1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/168913/
> >
> > > Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > > Signed-off-by: Shuicheng Lin <shuicheng.lin@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c | 12 ++++++++++--
> > > include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h | 4 +++-
> > > 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
> > > index 080c2fff0e95..9430b2be18e4 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
> > > @@ -2495,6 +2495,15 @@ vm_bind_ioctl_ops_create(struct xe_vm *vm, struct xe_vma_ops *vops,
> > > u32 i;
> > > if (!xe_vma_is_cpu_addr_mirror(vma)) {
> > > + if (XE_IOCTL_DBG(vm->xe,
> > > + prefetch_region ==
> > > + DRM_XE_CONSULT_MEM_ADVISE_PREF_LOC) ||
> > > + XE_IOCTL_DBG(vm->xe,
> > > + prefetch_region >=
> > > + ARRAY_SIZE(region_to_mem_type))) {
> > > + err = -EINVAL;
> > > + goto unwind_prefetch_ops;
> > > + }
> > > op->prefetch.region = prefetch_region;
> > > break;
> > > }
> > > @@ -3236,8 +3245,7 @@ static int op_lock_and_prep(struct drm_exec *exec, struct xe_vm *vm,
> > > if (!xe_vma_is_cpu_addr_mirror(vma)) {
> > > region = op->prefetch.region;
> > > - xe_assert(vm->xe, region == DRM_XE_CONSULT_MEM_ADVISE_PREF_LOC ||
> > > - region <= ARRAY_SIZE(region_to_mem_type));
> > > + xe_assert(vm->xe, region < ARRAY_SIZE(region_to_mem_type));
> > > }
> > > /*
> > > diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h b/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h
> > > index 509202a7b13e..e159c44e380a 100644
> > > --- a/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h
> > > +++ b/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h
> > > @@ -1075,7 +1075,9 @@ struct drm_xe_vm_destroy {
> > > *
> > > * The @prefetch_mem_region_instance for %DRM_XE_VM_BIND_OP_PREFETCH can also be:
> > > * - %DRM_XE_CONSULT_MEM_ADVISE_PREF_LOC, which ensures prefetching occurs in
> > > - * the memory region advised by madvise.
> > > + * the memory region advised by madvise. Only valid when the target VMA
> > > + * was created with %DRM_XE_VM_BIND_FLAG_CPU_ADDR_MIRROR; rejected with
> > > + * -EINVAL otherwise.
> > > */
> > > struct drm_xe_vm_bind_op {
> > > /** @extensions: Pointer to the first extension struct, if any */
> > > --
> > > 2.43.0
> > >
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-07-14 6:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-07-10 2:17 [PATCH] drm/xe/vm: Reject invalid prefetch region for non-SVM VMA Shuicheng Lin
2026-07-13 21:01 ` Matthew Brost
2026-07-14 3:32 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2026-07-14 6:20 ` Matthew Brost
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox