Linux kernel -stable discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Backport patch that wasn't dropped, but not applied in the actual stable release
@ 2026-07-21 18:51 Alex L.
  2026-07-27  8:14 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Alex L. @ 2026-07-21 18:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: stable@vger.kernel.org; +Cc: sashal@kernel.org

Hello,
I'm writing with regards to drm-amd-display-fix-ism-dc_lock-deadlock-during-susp.patch that can be found in the stable-queue repo, under releases/7.1.3/ on the master branch. 
(https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git/tree/releases/7.1.3/drm-amd-display-fix-ism-dc_lock-deadlock-during-susp.patch)

Despite being under the releases directory to this date, this patch wasn't actually applied in the 7.1.3 release upon inspection of the stable tree. It also wasn't included in the release announcement for 7.1.3 nor the diffstat within. It wasn't even included in the RC's for 7.1.3.
I have searched the stable mailing list and the stable-queue repo's commit histories to establish whether the patch was dropped later for some reason - to my knowledge, this doesn't appear to be the case.

On further investigation I found that the commit that first introduced this patch to stable-queue's queue-7.1/ added the patch file to the directory, but did not add it to the queue-7.1/series file. (https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git/commit/?id=76522806dbfb58941f6fa4b6116b891b66689613)

Could this be an accidental omission of the patch due to it not being on the series file, or was there some other reason that the patch was not included? 
As a user who's affected by the regression that the patch addresses, 
I would very much appreciate it being included in future 7.1.y releases. 

Thank you,
Alex


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: Backport patch that wasn't dropped, but not applied in the actual stable release
  2026-07-21 18:51 Backport patch that wasn't dropped, but not applied in the actual stable release Alex L.
@ 2026-07-27  8:14 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
  2026-07-27 12:34   ` Sasha Levin
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Thorsten Leemhuis @ 2026-07-27  8:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: sashal@kernel.org, Greg KH
  Cc: Alex L., stable@vger.kernel.org, Linux kernel regressions list

On 7/21/26 20:51, Alex L. wrote:
> Hello, I'm writing with regards to drm-amd-display-fix-ism-dc_lock-
> deadlock-during-susp.patch that can be found in the stable-queue
> repo, under releases/7.1.3/ on the master branch. (https://
> git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git/tree/
> releases/7.1.3/drm-amd-display-fix-ism-dc_lock-deadlock-during-
> susp.patch)
> 
> Despite being under the releases directory to this date, this patch
> wasn't actually applied in the 7.1.3 release upon inspection of the
> stable tree. It also wasn't included in the release announcement for
> 7.1.3 nor the diffstat within. It wasn't even included in the RC's
> for 7.1.3. I have searched the stable mailing list and the stable-
> queue repo's commit histories to establish whether the patch was
> dropped later for some reason - to my knowledge, this doesn't appear
> to be the case.
> 
> On further investigation I found that the commit that first
> introduced this patch to stable-queue's queue-7.1/ added the patch
> file to the directory, but did not add it to the queue-7.1/series
> file. (https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-
> queue.git/commit/?id=76522806dbfb58941f6fa4b6116b891b66689613)
> 
> Could this be an accidental omission of the patch due to it not
> being on the series file, or was there some other reason that the
> patch was not included? As a user who's affected by the regression
> that the patch addresses, I would very much appreciate it being
> included in future 7.1.y releases.
Greg, Sasha, from a quick look this analysis seems correct. Did some
script do something odd? Or did Alex and I miss something:

Reminder, it was Sasha that queued the patch for 7.1:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/stable-reply-item001-amd-ism-71-20260628203053@kernel.org/

Sashiko shortly afterwards (see thread) complained about two things, but
those were pre-existing issues (without any fixes in mainline, at least
I did not spon any references for it).

Ciao, Thorsten

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: Backport patch that wasn't dropped, but not applied in the actual stable release
  2026-07-27  8:14 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
@ 2026-07-27 12:34   ` Sasha Levin
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sasha Levin @ 2026-07-27 12:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thorsten Leemhuis
  Cc: Greg KH, Alex L., stable@vger.kernel.org,
	Linux kernel regressions list

On Mon, Jul 27, 2026 at 10:14:26AM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>On 7/21/26 20:51, Alex L. wrote:
>> Hello, I'm writing with regards to drm-amd-display-fix-ism-dc_lock-
>> deadlock-during-susp.patch that can be found in the stable-queue
>> repo, under releases/7.1.3/ on the master branch. (https://
>> git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git/tree/
>> releases/7.1.3/drm-amd-display-fix-ism-dc_lock-deadlock-during-
>> susp.patch)
>>
>> Despite being under the releases directory to this date, this patch
>> wasn't actually applied in the 7.1.3 release upon inspection of the
>> stable tree. It also wasn't included in the release announcement for
>> 7.1.3 nor the diffstat within. It wasn't even included in the RC's
>> for 7.1.3. I have searched the stable mailing list and the stable-
>> queue repo's commit histories to establish whether the patch was
>> dropped later for some reason - to my knowledge, this doesn't appear
>> to be the case.
>>
>> On further investigation I found that the commit that first
>> introduced this patch to stable-queue's queue-7.1/ added the patch
>> file to the directory, but did not add it to the queue-7.1/series
>> file. (https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-
>> queue.git/commit/?id=76522806dbfb58941f6fa4b6116b891b66689613)
>>
>> Could this be an accidental omission of the patch due to it not
>> being on the series file, or was there some other reason that the
>> patch was not included? As a user who's affected by the regression
>> that the patch addresses, I would very much appreciate it being
>> included in future 7.1.y releases.
>Greg, Sasha, from a quick look this analysis seems correct. Did some
>script do something odd? Or did Alex and I miss something:
>
>Reminder, it was Sasha that queued the patch for 7.1:
>https://lore.kernel.org/all/stable-reply-item001-amd-ism-71-20260628203053@kernel.org/
>
>Sashiko shortly afterwards (see thread) complained about two things, but
>those were pre-existing issues (without any fixes in mainline, at least
>I did not spon any references for it).

You're right - thanks for the report. I'll queue it up again.

-- 
Thanks,
Sasha

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-07-27 12:34 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-07-21 18:51 Backport patch that wasn't dropped, but not applied in the actual stable release Alex L.
2026-07-27  8:14 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2026-07-27 12:34   ` Sasha Levin

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox