* [PATCH v2] power: supply: cros_charge-control: restore EC state on resume [not found] <20261004225606.30577-1-andrew@fastmailteam.com> @ 2026-10-05 4:34 ` Andrew Pam 2026-10-05 6:24 ` Tzung-Bi Shih ` (2 more replies) 0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Andrew Pam @ 2026-10-05 4:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Tzung-Bi Shih, Thomas Weißschuh, Sebastian Reichel, Benson Leung Cc: Guenter Roeck, Matt DeVillier, chrome-platform, linux-pm, linux-kernel, Andrew Pam, stable The EC resets its charge control configuration when the AP powers off, so configured sustainer thresholds and charge behaviour are lost across hibernation. Nothing notices the reset. Commit 4fc88ba435da ("power: supply: cros_charge-control: adopt EC charge state on probe"), in the power-supply tree, made the driver adopt the EC's charge state, but only at probe, and a resume is not a probe. Sysfs therefore keeps reporting the configured values while the EC charges the battery to full. On a Framework Laptop 16 (Ryzen AI 300, charge control command version 3) with charge_control_end_threshold set to 80, a hibernate and resume cycle leaves the attribute still reading 80 while the battery charges past it to 100%. Add a system sleep resume hook that reprograms the EC from the cached state. The same EC behaviour and the same fix already exist for another driver, see commit 2643187ccb86 ("platform/x86: ayaneo-ec: Add suspend hook"). Reprogramming the EC is only strictly required after hibernation, but it is cheap and idempotent, so hook every resume path rather than rely on the EC preserving its state across each kind of sleep transition. Note that re-reading the state from the EC on resume, by reusing cros_chctl_init_state() or otherwise, would be wrong even on the command versions that support GET: the EC has been reset to its defaults by the time the hook runs, so adopting that state would silently discard the configuration the user asked for. The driver's cached state is the only remaining record of it, which is why it is pushed to the EC rather than refreshed from it. Fixes: c6ed48ef5259 ("power: supply: add ChromeOS EC based charge control driver") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-5-5 Signed-off-by: Andrew Pam <andrew@fastmailteam.com> --- Changes in v2: - Use dev_set_drvdata() in probe, symmetric with dev_get_drvdata() in the resume hook (Tzung-Bi) - Log an error if reprogramming the EC fails on resume (Tzung-Bi) - Use a nested .driver initialiser in struct platform_driver (Tzung-Bi) - Update the resume hook's comment, which still said the driver never reads the state back from the EC; untrue since 4fc88ba435da - Add Fixes: and Cc: stable tags - Commit message: say that 4fc88ba435da is in the power-supply tree, and reword its description v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20261004225606.30577-1-andrew@fastmailteam.com/ drivers/power/supply/cros_charge-control.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/power/supply/cros_charge-control.c b/drivers/power/supply/cros_charge-control.c index 07bcc6a9aeef..e5841b40563e 100644 --- a/drivers/power/supply/cros_charge-control.c +++ b/drivers/power/supply/cros_charge-control.c @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ #include <linux/platform_data/cros_ec_commands.h> #include <linux/platform_data/cros_ec_proto.h> #include <linux/platform_device.h> +#include <linux/pm.h> #include <linux/types.h> #define EC_CHARGE_CONTROL_BEHAVIOURS (BIT(POWER_SUPPLY_CHARGE_BEHAVIOUR_AUTO) | \ @@ -420,6 +421,7 @@ static int cros_chctl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) priv->dev = dev; priv->cros_ec = cros_ec; + dev_set_drvdata(dev, priv); if (priv->cmd_version == 1) priv->psy_ext = &cros_chctl_psy_ext_v1; @@ -439,6 +441,28 @@ static int cros_chctl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) return devm_battery_hook_register(dev, &priv->battery_hook); } +static int cros_chctl_resume(struct device *dev) +{ + struct cros_chctl_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev); + int ret; + + /* + * The EC resets its charge control state when the AP powers off, so the + * configuration is lost across hibernation, while the values exposed to + * userspace still describe it. The cached state is the only remaining + * record of that configuration: reprogram the EC from it rather than + * re-reading the EC, which would adopt the reset defaults instead. + */ + guard(mutex)(&priv->lock); + ret = cros_chctl_configure_ec(priv); + if (ret) + dev_err(dev, "failed to restore charge control state: %d\n", ret); + + return ret; +} + +static DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(cros_chctl_pm_ops, NULL, cros_chctl_resume); + static const struct platform_device_id cros_chctl_id[] = { { .name = "cros-charge-control" }, { } @@ -446,7 +470,10 @@ static const struct platform_device_id cros_chctl_id[] = { MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(platform, cros_chctl_id); static struct platform_driver cros_chctl_driver = { - .driver.name = "cros-charge-control", + .driver = { + .name = "cros-charge-control", + .pm = pm_sleep_ptr(&cros_chctl_pm_ops), + }, .probe = cros_chctl_probe, .id_table = cros_chctl_id, }; base-commit: 5c1c602463d597c5189ddc5a73dece588ba2c57a -- 2.53.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] power: supply: cros_charge-control: restore EC state on resume 2026-10-05 4:34 ` [PATCH v2] power: supply: cros_charge-control: restore EC state on resume Andrew Pam @ 2026-10-05 6:24 ` Tzung-Bi Shih 2026-10-07 8:01 ` Thomas Weißschuh 2026-10-17 21:56 ` Sebastian Reichel 2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Tzung-Bi Shih @ 2026-10-05 6:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Pam Cc: Thomas Weißschuh, Sebastian Reichel, Benson Leung, Guenter Roeck, Matt DeVillier, chrome-platform, linux-pm, linux-kernel, stable On Mon, Oct 05, 2026 at 03:34:18PM +1100, Andrew Pam wrote: > The EC resets its charge control configuration when the AP powers off, > so configured sustainer thresholds and charge behaviour are lost across > hibernation. > > Nothing notices the reset. Commit 4fc88ba435da ("power: supply: > cros_charge-control: adopt EC charge state on probe"), in the > power-supply tree, made the driver adopt the EC's charge state, but only > at probe, and a resume is not a probe. Sysfs therefore keeps reporting > the configured values while the EC charges the battery to full. On a > Framework Laptop 16 (Ryzen AI 300, charge control command version 3) > with charge_control_end_threshold set to 80, a hibernate and resume > cycle leaves the attribute still reading 80 while the battery charges > past it to 100%. > > Add a system sleep resume hook that reprograms the EC from the cached > state. The same EC behaviour and the same fix already exist for another > driver, see commit 2643187ccb86 ("platform/x86: ayaneo-ec: Add suspend > hook"). > > Reprogramming the EC is only strictly required after hibernation, but it > is cheap and idempotent, so hook every resume path rather than rely on > the EC preserving its state across each kind of sleep transition. > > Note that re-reading the state from the EC on resume, by reusing > cros_chctl_init_state() or otherwise, would be wrong even on the command > versions that support GET: the EC has been reset to its defaults by the > time the hook runs, so adopting that state would silently discard the > configuration the user asked for. The driver's cached state is the only > remaining record of it, which is why it is pushed to the EC rather than > refreshed from it. > > Fixes: c6ed48ef5259 ("power: supply: add ChromeOS EC based charge control driver") > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-5-5 > Signed-off-by: Andrew Pam <andrew@fastmailteam.com> Reviewed-by: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org> You should send new versions (e.g., v2) independently next time, instead of replying to your previous versions (e.g., v1). ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] power: supply: cros_charge-control: restore EC state on resume 2026-10-05 4:34 ` [PATCH v2] power: supply: cros_charge-control: restore EC state on resume Andrew Pam 2026-10-05 6:24 ` Tzung-Bi Shih @ 2026-10-07 8:01 ` Thomas Weißschuh 2026-10-17 21:56 ` Sebastian Reichel 2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Thomas Weißschuh @ 2026-10-07 8:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Pam Cc: Tzung-Bi Shih, Sebastian Reichel, Benson Leung, Guenter Roeck, Matt DeVillier, chrome-platform, linux-pm, linux-kernel, stable On 2026-10-05 15:34:18+1100, Andrew Pam wrote: > The EC resets its charge control configuration when the AP powers off, > so configured sustainer thresholds and charge behaviour are lost across > hibernation. (...) > Fixes: c6ed48ef5259 ("power: supply: add ChromeOS EC based charge control driver") > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-5-5 > Signed-off-by: Andrew Pam <andrew@fastmailteam.com> Acked-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net> (...) > drivers/power/supply/cros_charge-control.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (...) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] power: supply: cros_charge-control: restore EC state on resume 2026-10-05 4:34 ` [PATCH v2] power: supply: cros_charge-control: restore EC state on resume Andrew Pam 2026-10-05 6:24 ` Tzung-Bi Shih 2026-10-07 8:01 ` Thomas Weißschuh @ 2026-10-17 21:56 ` Sebastian Reichel 2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Sebastian Reichel @ 2026-10-17 21:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Tzung-Bi Shih, Thomas Weißschuh, Sebastian Reichel, Benson Leung, Andrew Pam Cc: Guenter Roeck, Matt DeVillier, chrome-platform, linux-pm, linux-kernel, stable On Mon, 05 Oct 2026 15:34:18 +1100, Andrew Pam wrote: > The EC resets its charge control configuration when the AP powers off, > so configured sustainer thresholds and charge behaviour are lost across > hibernation. > > Nothing notices the reset. Commit 4fc88ba435da ("power: supply: > cros_charge-control: adopt EC charge state on probe"), in the > power-supply tree, made the driver adopt the EC's charge state, but only > at probe, and a resume is not a probe. Sysfs therefore keeps reporting > the configured values while the EC charges the battery to full. On a > Framework Laptop 16 (Ryzen AI 300, charge control command version 3) > with charge_control_end_threshold set to 80, a hibernate and resume > cycle leaves the attribute still reading 80 while the battery charges > past it to 100%. > > [...] Applied, thanks! [1/1] power: supply: cros_charge-control: restore EC state on resume commit: 1f2a40f954c848dff9d8bb6d81e404f9e47f0e81 Best regards, -- Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-10-17 21:56 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20261004225606.30577-1-andrew@fastmailteam.com>
2026-10-05 4:34 ` [PATCH v2] power: supply: cros_charge-control: restore EC state on resume Andrew Pam
2026-10-05 6:24 ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-10-07 8:01 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-10-17 21:56 ` Sebastian Reichel
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox