* [PATCH] xfs: read rmapbt high key offsets with get_unaligned() in scrub
@ 2026-11-09 13:48 Stian Halseth
2026-11-09 21:40 ` Dave Chinner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Stian Halseth @ 2026-11-09 13:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Carlos Maiolino, linux-xfs
Cc: Darrick J . Wong, sparclinux, Stian Halseth, Jan Engelhardt,
stable
An rmapbt node stores each key as a low/high pair of packed 20-byte
struct xfs_rmap_key, so every high key is only 4-byte aligned.
union xfs_btree_key is 8-byte aligned, which lets the compiler read
rm_offset through it with an 8-byte load. On sparc64 every high key
checked by xchk_rmapbt_check_unwritten_in_keyflags() then takes an
unaligned access trap:
Kernel unaligned access at TPC[105a54d8] xchk_rmapbt_check_unwritten_in_keyflags+0xb8/0x160 [xfs]
Use get_unaligned() for the high key.
Fixes: 38384569a2a8 ("xfs: detect unwritten bit set in rmapbt node block keys")
Reported-by: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@inai.de>
Closes: https://github.com/sparclinux/issues/issues/115
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v6.4+
Signed-off-by: Stian Halseth <stian@itx.no>
---
Tested on sparc64 (T4, 7.3.3) by scrubbing the rmapbt of a loop-mounted
image: alignment faults per scrub went from about 4000 to 0.
fs/xfs/scrub/rmap.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/scrub/rmap.c b/fs/xfs/scrub/rmap.c
index 68e2847c962bb..d0578800f3e41 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/scrub/rmap.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/scrub/rmap.c
@@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ xchk_rmapbt_check_unwritten_in_keyflags(
}
hkey = xfs_btree_high_key_addr(cur, ptr, keyblock);
- if (hkey->rmap.rm_offset & badflag) {
+ if (get_unaligned(&hkey->rmap.rm_offset) & badflag) {
xchk_btree_set_preen(sc, cur, level);
break;
}
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] xfs: read rmapbt high key offsets with get_unaligned() in scrub
2026-11-09 13:48 [PATCH] xfs: read rmapbt high key offsets with get_unaligned() in scrub Stian Halseth
@ 2026-11-09 21:40 ` Dave Chinner
2026-11-10 8:33 ` Stian Halseth
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dave Chinner @ 2026-11-09 21:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stian Halseth
Cc: Carlos Maiolino, linux-xfs, Darrick J . Wong, sparclinux,
Jan Engelhardt, stable
On Mon, Nov 09, 2026 at 02:48:53PM +0100, Stian Halseth wrote:
> An rmapbt node stores each key as a low/high pair of packed 20-byte
> struct xfs_rmap_key, so every high key is only 4-byte aligned.
> union xfs_btree_key is 8-byte aligned, which lets the compiler read
> rm_offset through it with an 8-byte load. On sparc64 every high key
> checked by xchk_rmapbt_check_unwritten_in_keyflags() then takes an
> unaligned access trap:
>
> Kernel unaligned access at TPC[105a54d8] xchk_rmapbt_check_unwritten_in_keyflags+0xb8/0x160 [xfs]
>
> Use get_unaligned() for the high key.
>
> Fixes: 38384569a2a8 ("xfs: detect unwritten bit set in rmapbt node block keys")
> Reported-by: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@inai.de>
> Closes: https://github.com/sparclinux/issues/issues/115
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v6.4+
> Signed-off-by: Stian Halseth <stian@itx.no>
> ---
> Tested on sparc64 (T4, 7.3.3) by scrubbing the rmapbt of a loop-mounted
> image: alignment faults per scrub went from about 4000 to 0.
>
> fs/xfs/scrub/rmap.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/scrub/rmap.c b/fs/xfs/scrub/rmap.c
> index 68e2847c962bb..d0578800f3e41 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/scrub/rmap.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/scrub/rmap.c
> @@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ xchk_rmapbt_check_unwritten_in_keyflags(
> }
>
> hkey = xfs_btree_high_key_addr(cur, ptr, keyblock);
> - if (hkey->rmap.rm_offset & badflag) {
> + if (get_unaligned(&hkey->rmap.rm_offset) & badflag) {
> xchk_btree_set_preen(sc, cur, level);
> break;
> }
That just looks wrong to begin with. Decoding an on-disk structure
without using be64_to_cpu() to get it in the correct endian order
first?
Oh... the code plays "I'm too smart for my own good" micro-
optimisation games by endian swapping the badflag variable to avoid
needing to endian swap the rm_offset field.
It seems to me that the correct fix here is to stop endian swapping
the badflag variable, and endian swap the rmap.rm_offset fetches for
both the low key and high keys, like all the other places that
dereference rmap.rm_offset direct from pointers returned by
xfs_btree_key_addr()/xfs_btree_high_key_addr().
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
dgc@kernel.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] xfs: read rmapbt high key offsets with get_unaligned() in scrub
2026-11-09 21:40 ` Dave Chinner
@ 2026-11-10 8:33 ` Stian Halseth
2026-11-10 20:28 ` Dave Chinner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Stian Halseth @ 2026-11-10 8:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dave Chinner
Cc: Carlos Maiolino, linux-xfs, Darrick J . Wong, sparclinux,
Jan Engelhardt, stable
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1488 bytes --]
Hi Dave,
On Tue, 2026-11-10 at 08:40 +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
>
> That just looks wrong to begin with. Decoding an on-disk structure
> without using be64_to_cpu() to get it in the correct endian order
> first?
>
> Oh... the code plays "I'm too smart for my own good" micro-
> optimisation games by endian swapping the badflag variable to avoid
> needing to endian swap the rm_offset field.
>
> It seems to me that the correct fix here is to stop endian swapping
> the badflag variable, and endian swap the rmap.rm_offset fetches for
> both the low key and high keys, like all the other places that
> dereference rmap.rm_offset direct from pointers returned by
> xfs_btree_key_addr()/xfs_btree_high_key_addr().
>
Thanks, I've looked a bit deeper than my one-line fix, based on your
feedback.
Yes, we can remove badflag. be64_to_cpu() alone doesn't fix the
trap, though, since it's a no-op on big-endian. gcc still reads
hkey->rmap.rm_offset with the same 8-byte ldx. I tried it on my
T4-1 and the fault count didn't change.
The other places get away with it because they go through a
struct xfs_rmap_key pointer first (kp = &key->rmap in
xfs_rmapbt_cmp_key_with_cur() and xfs_rmapbt_cmp_two_keys()), and since
that struct is packed gcc uses byte loads.
I suggest we do the the same here, with be64_to_cpu() and no badflag.
That gets the faults to zero on the T4-1. Can send that as a v2 later,
if no one disagree with that approach.
/Stian
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] xfs: read rmapbt high key offsets with get_unaligned() in scrub
2026-11-10 8:33 ` Stian Halseth
@ 2026-11-10 20:28 ` Dave Chinner
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dave Chinner @ 2026-11-10 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stian Halseth
Cc: Carlos Maiolino, linux-xfs, Darrick J . Wong, sparclinux,
Jan Engelhardt, stable
On Tue, Nov 10, 2026 at 09:33:46AM +0100, Stian Halseth wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> On Tue, 2026-11-10 at 08:40 +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> >
> > That just looks wrong to begin with. Decoding an on-disk structure
> > without using be64_to_cpu() to get it in the correct endian order
> > first?
> >
> > Oh... the code plays "I'm too smart for my own good" micro-
> > optimisation games by endian swapping the badflag variable to avoid
> > needing to endian swap the rm_offset field.
> >
> > It seems to me that the correct fix here is to stop endian swapping
> > the badflag variable, and endian swap the rmap.rm_offset fetches for
> > both the low key and high keys, like all the other places that
> > dereference rmap.rm_offset direct from pointers returned by
> > xfs_btree_key_addr()/xfs_btree_high_key_addr().
> >
>
> Thanks, I've looked a bit deeper than my one-line fix, based on your
> feedback.
>
> Yes, we can remove badflag. be64_to_cpu() alone doesn't fix the
> trap, though, since it's a no-op on big-endian. gcc still reads
> hkey->rmap.rm_offset with the same 8-byte ldx. I tried it on my
> T4-1 and the fault count didn't change.
>
> The other places get away with it because they go through a
> struct xfs_rmap_key pointer first (kp = &key->rmap in
> xfs_rmapbt_cmp_key_with_cur() and xfs_rmapbt_cmp_two_keys()), and since
> that struct is packed gcc uses byte loads.
Ah, that explains why those work without issue - that's the bit I
missed.
> I suggest we do the the same here, with be64_to_cpu() and no badflag.
> That gets the faults to zero on the T4-1. Can send that as a v2 later,
> if no one disagree with that approach.
It sounds like the right approach to me.
-Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
dgc@kernel.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-11-10 20:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-11-09 13:48 [PATCH] xfs: read rmapbt high key offsets with get_unaligned() in scrub Stian Halseth
2026-11-09 21:40 ` Dave Chinner
2026-11-10 8:33 ` Stian Halseth
2026-11-10 20:28 ` Dave Chinner
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox