* [PATCH v3 0/2] futex: Canonicalize arm64 tagged user addresses
@ 2026-11-09 18:26 Shubhang Kaushik (Ampere)
2026-11-09 18:26 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] " Shubhang Kaushik (Ampere)
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Shubhang Kaushik (Ampere) @ 2026-11-09 18:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, Peter Zijlstra, Darren Hart,
Davidlohr Bueso, André Almeida, Shuah Khan, Kees Cook,
Shubhang Kaushik, Christoph Lameter (Ampere), Catalin Marinas,
Andrey Konovalov, Will Deacon
Cc: linux-kernel, linux-kselftest, Shubhang Kaushik (Ampere), stable
Changes in v3:
- Split the stable-targeted futex fix from its selftest, so the
selftest patch is not Cc'd to stable.
- Add Davidlohr Bueso's Acked-by tag to the futex fix.
Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20261030-futex-tagged-uaddr-v2-prep-v2-1-131eb7414bda@gentwo.org
Signed-off-by: Shubhang Kaushik (Ampere) <sh@gentwo.org>
---
Shubhang Kaushik (Ampere) (2):
futex: Canonicalize arm64 tagged user addresses
selftests/futex: Test tagged arm64 futex addresses
kernel/futex/core.c | 2 +
.../testing/selftests/futex/functional/.gitignore | 1 +
tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/Makefile | 1 +
.../selftests/futex/functional/futex_tagged_addr.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++
tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/run.sh | 3 ++
5 files changed, 68 insertions(+)
---
base-commit: 7475ea8b58616b33c04afb976cf0fbaad9dd63fb
change-id: 20261030-futex-tagged-uaddr-v2-prep-63ea40b5a22f
Best regards,
--
Shubhang Kaushik (Ampere) <sh@gentwo.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 1/2] futex: Canonicalize arm64 tagged user addresses
2026-11-09 18:26 [PATCH v3 0/2] futex: Canonicalize arm64 tagged user addresses Shubhang Kaushik (Ampere)
@ 2026-11-09 18:26 ` Shubhang Kaushik (Ampere)
2026-11-12 17:34 ` Catalin Marinas
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Shubhang Kaushik (Ampere) @ 2026-11-09 18:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, Peter Zijlstra, Darren Hart,
Davidlohr Bueso, André Almeida, Shuah Khan, Kees Cook,
Shubhang Kaushik, Christoph Lameter (Ampere), Catalin Marinas,
Andrey Konovalov, Will Deacon
Cc: linux-kernel, linux-kselftest, Shubhang Kaushik (Ampere), stable
On arm64, a thread that enables the tagged address ABI can pass valid
top-byte-tagged user pointers to futex syscalls. Such a pointer must
have the same syscall behaviour as its untagged form.
get_futex_key() validates the user address with access_ok(), but uses
the raw address when constructing private and shared-anonymous futex
keys. A waiter using a tagged address and a waker using the untagged
form can therefore access the same futex word while hashing to distinct
keys, causing FUTEX_WAKE to miss the waiter.
Keep access_ok() on the original pointer so that arm64 retains its
per-thread tagged-address ABI enforcement. Canonicalize the address
afterwards, before it is used for futex key construction and shared
mapping lookup.
Fixes: 63f0c6037965 ("arm64: Introduce prctl() options to control the tagged user addresses ABI")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Acked-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Signed-off-by: Shubhang Kaushik (Ampere) <sh@gentwo.org>
---
kernel/futex/core.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/futex/core.c b/kernel/futex/core.c
index a240638f69e5c65bd036434a15f3df680efb4638..dcc8ffca38595a5ea69f3672375ffb9f9c6766f9 100644
--- a/kernel/futex/core.c
+++ b/kernel/futex/core.c
@@ -539,6 +539,8 @@ int get_futex_key(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags, union futex_key *key,
if (unlikely(!access_ok(uaddr, size)))
return -EFAULT;
+ address = untagged_addr(address);
+
if (unlikely(should_fail_futex(fshared)))
return -EFAULT;
--
2.52.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] futex: Canonicalize arm64 tagged user addresses
2026-11-09 18:26 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] " Shubhang Kaushik (Ampere)
@ 2026-11-12 17:34 ` Catalin Marinas
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Catalin Marinas @ 2026-11-12 17:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Shubhang Kaushik (Ampere)
Cc: Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, Peter Zijlstra, Darren Hart,
Davidlohr Bueso, André Almeida, Shuah Khan, Kees Cook,
Shubhang Kaushik, Christoph Lameter (Ampere), Andrey Konovalov,
Will Deacon, linux-kernel, linux-kselftest, stable
On Mon, Nov 09, 2026 at 10:26:47AM -0800, Shubhang Kaushik (Ampere) wrote:
> On arm64, a thread that enables the tagged address ABI can pass valid
> top-byte-tagged user pointers to futex syscalls. Such a pointer must
> have the same syscall behaviour as its untagged form.
>
> get_futex_key() validates the user address with access_ok(), but uses
> the raw address when constructing private and shared-anonymous futex
> keys. A waiter using a tagged address and a waker using the untagged
> form can therefore access the same futex word while hashing to distinct
> keys, causing FUTEX_WAKE to miss the waiter.
>
> Keep access_ok() on the original pointer so that arm64 retains its
> per-thread tagged-address ABI enforcement. Canonicalize the address
> afterwards, before it is used for futex key construction and shared
> mapping lookup.
>
> Fixes: 63f0c6037965 ("arm64: Introduce prctl() options to control the tagged user addresses ABI")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Acked-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
> Signed-off-by: Shubhang Kaushik (Ampere) <sh@gentwo.org>
> ---
> kernel/futex/core.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/futex/core.c b/kernel/futex/core.c
> index a240638f69e5c65bd036434a15f3df680efb4638..dcc8ffca38595a5ea69f3672375ffb9f9c6766f9 100644
> --- a/kernel/futex/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/futex/core.c
> @@ -539,6 +539,8 @@ int get_futex_key(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags, union futex_key *key,
> if (unlikely(!access_ok(uaddr, size)))
> return -EFAULT;
>
> + address = untagged_addr(address);
> +
> if (unlikely(should_fail_futex(fshared)))
> return -EFAULT;
Thomas, Peter, do you plan to take this fix via tip or you'd rather we
take it via arm64? TBH, I don't think it's urgent, the bug has been
around since 2019.
Thanks.
--
Catalin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-11-12 17:34 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-11-09 18:26 [PATCH v3 0/2] futex: Canonicalize arm64 tagged user addresses Shubhang Kaushik (Ampere)
2026-11-09 18:26 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] " Shubhang Kaushik (Ampere)
2026-11-12 17:34 ` Catalin Marinas
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox