From: "Dutta, Anurag" <a-dutta@ti.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
Francesco Dolcini <francesco@dolcini.it>,
Siddharth Vadapalli <s-vadapalli@ti.com>,
<linux-spi@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<stable@vger.kernel.org>,
"Gujulan Elango, Hari Prasath" <gehariprasath@ti.com>,
"Kumar, Udit" <u-kumar1@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: cadence-quadspi: Fix clock enable underflows due to runtime PM
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2025 15:22:43 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cf8e7003-ebca-4817-8350-f29332d75fab@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5525272e-7220-4352-bb08-ac66631108e0@ti.com>
On 09-12-2025 11:13, Dutta, Anurag wrote:
>
> On 05-12-2025 18:55, Mark Brown wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 05, 2025 at 06:28:06PM +0530, Dutta, Anurag wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Mark and Nishanth The below seems to work for me on j721e. Let me
>>> know
>>> your thoughts.
>>> Also, the error actually comes from :
>>> if (cqspi->use_direct_mode) {
>>> ret = cqspi_request_mmap_dma(cqspi);
>>> if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER)
>>> goto probe_setup_failed;
>>> }
>>> And not from flash_setup().
>> Great, thanks for confirming. We should probably ensure that has some
>> logging...
>>
>>> @@ -2024,7 +2024,7 @@ static int cqspi_probe(struct platform_device
>>> *pdev)
>>> probe_reset_failed:
>>> if (cqspi->is_jh7110)
>>> cqspi_jh7110_disable_clk(pdev, cqspi);
>>> - clk_disable_unprepare(cqspi->clk);
>>> + pm_runtime_force_suspend(dev);
>>> probe_clk_failed:
>> The trouble with that is that in the !CONFIG_PM case
>> pm_runtime_force_suspend() is defined as:
>>
>> static inline int pm_runtime_force_suspend(struct device *dev) {
>> return 0; }
>>
>> so we'll leak the clock enable. If we could just require runtime PM
>> this would be an awful lot easier to deal with.
> So, can we maintain an internal state of the clock(enabled/disabled)
> in the struct cqspi_st ?
> Before every, clk_disable_unprepare()/clk_prepare_enable(), we check
> if the clock is actually
> enabled/disabled by checking the state of "atomic_t clock_enabled"
> within struct cqspi_st.
> And, when we do clk_disable_unprepare()/clk_prepare_enable(), we set
> the value of clock_enabled
> accordingly.
>
> Is this a good approach, given we take care of race conditions as well ?
>
>
Another solution :
diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-cadence-quadspi.c
b/drivers/spi/spi-cadence-quadspi.c
index af6d050da1c8..4d298b945f09 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-cadence-quadspi.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-cadence-quadspi.c
@@ -2024,7 +2024,11 @@ static int cqspi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
probe_reset_failed:
if (cqspi->is_jh7110)
cqspi_jh7110_disable_clk(pdev, cqspi);
- clk_disable_unprepare(cqspi->clk);
+
+ if (!(ddata && (ddata->quirks & CQSPI_DISABLE_RUNTIME_PM))) {
+ if (pm_runtime_get_sync(&pdev->dev) >= 0)
+ clk_disable_unprepare(cqspi->clk);
+ }
probe_clk_failed:
return ret;
}
pm_runtime_get_sync() will increment the usage count thereby preventing
from runtime_suspend()
getting invoked, thereby preventing double clock_disable()
This will work for !CONFIG_PM as well because pm_runtime_get_sync() will
return 1 then.
and the runtime_suspend() is never going to be invoked.
logs :
with CONFIG_PM :
https://gist.github.com/anuragdutta731/c0080a7592de992e71103e9947639b2a
without CONFIG_PM :
https://gist.github.com/anuragdutta731/f9a79302b65088d53db2c970b6b8eff0
It work for both cases on j721e. Please share your thoughts.
Regards
Anurag
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-09 9:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-02 22:53 [PATCH] spi: cadence-quadspi: Fix clock enable underflows due to runtime PM Mark Brown
2025-12-03 10:42 ` Siddharth Vadapalli
2025-12-03 11:58 ` Mark Brown
2025-12-04 9:13 ` Francesco Dolcini
2025-12-04 13:28 ` Mark Brown
2025-12-04 13:44 ` Mark Brown
2025-12-04 14:05 ` Nishanth Menon
2025-12-04 15:11 ` Mark Brown
2025-12-04 17:05 ` Mark Brown
2025-12-05 12:54 ` Dutta, Anurag
2025-12-05 12:58 ` Dutta, Anurag
2025-12-05 13:25 ` Mark Brown
2025-12-09 5:43 ` Dutta, Anurag
2025-12-09 9:52 ` Dutta, Anurag [this message]
2025-12-09 10:30 ` Mark Brown
2025-12-12 4:34 ` Dutta, Anurag
2025-12-12 6:04 ` Mark Brown
2025-12-12 6:07 ` Mark Brown
2025-12-12 7:14 ` Dutta, Anurag
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cf8e7003-ebca-4817-8350-f29332d75fab@ti.com \
--to=a-dutta@ti.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=francesco@dolcini.it \
--cc=gehariprasath@ti.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=s-vadapalli@ti.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=u-kumar1@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox