From: Farhan Ali <alifm@linux.ibm.com>
To: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 stable 6.12 0/3] s390 KVM PCI backports for 6.12
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2026 11:59:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dd24992f-c226-487a-8587-bc824c1a4707@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260811184500.stable-0008-sashal@kernel.org>
On 8/11/2026 11:55 AM, Sasha Levin wrote:
>> This patchset backports the failed commits to stable-6.12. I have resolved
>> the merge conflicts and tested them on s390.
> Thanks for the respin - this one does apply, and 3/3 now falls through
> into free_aisb: the way mainline does, so both of my objections to v1
> are addressed.
>
> One thing left in 1/3: the conflict resolution keeps 6.12's existing
> in-loop
>
> cur_pages = atomic_long_read(&user->locked_vm);
>
> in account_mem() as well as adding the pre-loop read. It is harmless,
> but it is the only line where 6.12 would then differ from mainline and
> from 6.18/7.1. Could you drop the in-loop read and resend? The same
> artifact is in the 6.6 and 6.1 submissions.
>
> While you are respinning: 0cfe660559e8 ("KVM: s390: pci: Fix aisb
> calculation") is missing from 6.18, 6.12, 6.6 and 6.1 - only 7.1 has it.
> kvm_zpci_set_airq() on these trees still computes the AISB address as
> aift->sbv->vector + (zdev->aisb / 64) * 8, which goes out of bounds past
> 64 forwarded devices. Could you or Matthew include it in the resend?
Yeah, I can send that as part of the re-spin. Will send out updates for
all the relevant backports.
Thanks
Farhan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-11 18:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-10 18:21 [PATCH v2 stable 6.12 0/3] s390 KVM PCI backports for 6.12 Farhan Ali
2026-08-10 18:21 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] KVM: s390: pci: Fix memory accounting for pinned/unpinned pages Farhan Ali
2026-08-10 18:21 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] KVM: s390: pci: Fix missing error codes and memory unaccounting Farhan Ali
2026-08-10 18:21 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] KVM: s390: pci: Fix resource leak on IRQ registration failure Farhan Ali
2026-08-11 18:55 ` [PATCH v2 stable 6.12 0/3] s390 KVM PCI backports for 6.12 Sasha Levin
2026-08-11 18:59 ` Farhan Ali [this message]
2026-08-12 16:26 ` Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=dd24992f-c226-487a-8587-bc824c1a4707@linux.ibm.com \
--to=alifm@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox