Linux kernel -stable discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] drm/xe: Restrict user fences to long running VMs
@ 2024-06-03 17:53 Matthew Brost
  2024-06-03 20:42 ` Thomas Hellström
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Matthew Brost @ 2024-06-03 17:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: intel-xe; +Cc: Matthew Brost, Thomas Hellström, stable

User fences are intended to be used on long running VMs, enforce this
restriction. This addresses possible concerns of using user fences in
dma-fence and having the dma-fence signal before the user fence.

Fixes: d1df9bfbf68c ("drm/xe: Only allow 1 ufence per exec / bind IOCTL")
Fixes: dd08ebf6c352 ("drm/xe: Introduce a new DRM driver for Intel GPUs")
Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c | 3 ++-
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c   | 3 ++-
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c
index 97eeb973e897..a145813ad229 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c
@@ -168,7 +168,8 @@ int xe_exec_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *file)
 			num_ufence++;
 	}
 
-	if (XE_IOCTL_DBG(xe, num_ufence > 1)) {
+	if (XE_IOCTL_DBG(xe, num_ufence > 1) ||
+	    XE_IOCTL_DBG(xe, num_ufence && !xe_vm_in_lr_mode(vm))) {
 		err = -EINVAL;
 		goto err_syncs;
 	}
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
index 26b409e1b0f0..85da3a8a83b6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
@@ -3226,7 +3226,8 @@ int xe_vm_bind_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *file)
 			num_ufence++;
 	}
 
-	if (XE_IOCTL_DBG(xe, num_ufence > 1)) {
+	if (XE_IOCTL_DBG(xe, num_ufence > 1) ||
+	    XE_IOCTL_DBG(xe, num_ufence && !xe_vm_in_lr_mode(vm))) {
 		err = -EINVAL;
 		goto free_syncs;
 	}
-- 
2.34.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] drm/xe: Restrict user fences to long running VMs
  2024-06-03 17:53 [PATCH] drm/xe: Restrict user fences to long running VMs Matthew Brost
@ 2024-06-03 20:42 ` Thomas Hellström
  2024-06-03 22:18   ` Matthew Brost
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Hellström @ 2024-06-03 20:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Matthew Brost, intel-xe; +Cc: stable

Hi,

On Mon, 2024-06-03 at 10:53 -0700, Matthew Brost wrote:
> User fences are intended to be used on long running VMs, enforce this
> restriction. This addresses possible concerns of using user fences in
> dma-fence and having the dma-fence signal before the user fence.

As mentioned in a separate thread, We should not introduce an uAPI
change with the above motivation. We need to discuss potential use-
cases for !LR vms and if there are found to be none, we could consider
restricting in this way.

/Thomas


> 
> Fixes: d1df9bfbf68c ("drm/xe: Only allow 1 ufence per exec / bind
> IOCTL")
> Fixes: dd08ebf6c352 ("drm/xe: Introduce a new DRM driver for Intel
> GPUs")
> Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c | 3 ++-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c   | 3 ++-
>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c
> index 97eeb973e897..a145813ad229 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c
> @@ -168,7 +168,8 @@ int xe_exec_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void
> *data, struct drm_file *file)
>  			num_ufence++;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (XE_IOCTL_DBG(xe, num_ufence > 1)) {
> +	if (XE_IOCTL_DBG(xe, num_ufence > 1) ||
> +	    XE_IOCTL_DBG(xe, num_ufence && !xe_vm_in_lr_mode(vm))) {
>  		err = -EINVAL;
>  		goto err_syncs;
>  	}
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
> index 26b409e1b0f0..85da3a8a83b6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
> @@ -3226,7 +3226,8 @@ int xe_vm_bind_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev,
> void *data, struct drm_file *file)
>  			num_ufence++;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (XE_IOCTL_DBG(xe, num_ufence > 1)) {
> +	if (XE_IOCTL_DBG(xe, num_ufence > 1) ||
> +	    XE_IOCTL_DBG(xe, num_ufence && !xe_vm_in_lr_mode(vm))) {
>  		err = -EINVAL;
>  		goto free_syncs;
>  	}


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] drm/xe: Restrict user fences to long running VMs
  2024-06-03 20:42 ` Thomas Hellström
@ 2024-06-03 22:18   ` Matthew Brost
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Matthew Brost @ 2024-06-03 22:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Hellström; +Cc: intel-xe, stable

On Mon, Jun 03, 2024 at 10:42:19PM +0200, Thomas Hellström wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Mon, 2024-06-03 at 10:53 -0700, Matthew Brost wrote:
> > User fences are intended to be used on long running VMs, enforce this
> > restriction. This addresses possible concerns of using user fences in
> > dma-fence and having the dma-fence signal before the user fence.
> 
> As mentioned in a separate thread, We should not introduce an uAPI
> change with the above motivation. We need to discuss potential use-

Sure. Agree this is really an orthogonal change to the other thread.
Just noticed we didn't have restriction when typing in that thread.

> cases for !LR vms and if there are found to be none, we could consider
> restricting in this way.

IMO we should strongly consider this as conceptually gives a clear
seperation of synchronization between non-LR and LR VMs.

Matt

> 
> /Thomas
> 
> 
> > 
> > Fixes: d1df9bfbf68c ("drm/xe: Only allow 1 ufence per exec / bind
> > IOCTL")
> > Fixes: dd08ebf6c352 ("drm/xe: Introduce a new DRM driver for Intel
> > GPUs")
> > Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c | 3 ++-
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c   | 3 ++-
> >  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c
> > index 97eeb973e897..a145813ad229 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c
> > @@ -168,7 +168,8 @@ int xe_exec_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void
> > *data, struct drm_file *file)
> >  			num_ufence++;
> >  	}
> >  
> > -	if (XE_IOCTL_DBG(xe, num_ufence > 1)) {
> > +	if (XE_IOCTL_DBG(xe, num_ufence > 1) ||
> > +	    XE_IOCTL_DBG(xe, num_ufence && !xe_vm_in_lr_mode(vm))) {
> >  		err = -EINVAL;
> >  		goto err_syncs;
> >  	}
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
> > index 26b409e1b0f0..85da3a8a83b6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
> > @@ -3226,7 +3226,8 @@ int xe_vm_bind_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev,
> > void *data, struct drm_file *file)
> >  			num_ufence++;
> >  	}
> >  
> > -	if (XE_IOCTL_DBG(xe, num_ufence > 1)) {
> > +	if (XE_IOCTL_DBG(xe, num_ufence > 1) ||
> > +	    XE_IOCTL_DBG(xe, num_ufence && !xe_vm_in_lr_mode(vm))) {
> >  		err = -EINVAL;
> >  		goto free_syncs;
> >  	}
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2024-06-03 22:19 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-06-03 17:53 [PATCH] drm/xe: Restrict user fences to long running VMs Matthew Brost
2024-06-03 20:42 ` Thomas Hellström
2024-06-03 22:18   ` Matthew Brost

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox