* Re: Patch "vsock/virtio: fix potential unbounded skb queue" has been added to the 6.1-stable tree
[not found] <20261018131321.3798770-1-sashal@kernel.org>
@ 2026-10-19 13:48 ` Stefano Garzarella
2026-10-19 16:54 ` Sasha Levin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Stefano Garzarella @ 2026-10-19 13:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: stable
Cc: stable-commits, edumazet, Michael S. Tsirkin, Jason Wang,
Eugenio Pérez, Xuan Zhuo, Stefan Hajnoczi, David S. Miller,
Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Simon Horman
On Sun, Oct 18, 2026 at 09:13:20AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
>
> vsock/virtio: fix potential unbounded skb queue
>
> to the 6.1-stable tree which can be found at:
> http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
>
> The filename of the patch is:
> vsock-virtio-fix-potential-unbounded-skb-queue.patch
> and it can be found in the queue-6.1 subdirectory.
>
> If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
> please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
Be careful with this patch, this caused data loss. It's fixed upstream
by commits:
a4f0b001782b ("vsock/virtio: reset connection on receiving queue
overflow")
2a12c05aef21 ("vsock/virtio: collapse receive queue under memory
pressure")
c6087c5aaad6 ("vsock/virtio: fix skb overhead accounting to preserve
full buf_alloc")
So if you want to backport this patch, I strongly recommend that you
include these others as well in the same backport.
Thanks,
Stefano
>
>
>
> commit 86c46b1c51eea22456caf8a28a43ccc3da623f01
> Author: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@kernel.org>
> Date: Thu Apr 30 12:26:52 2026 +0000
>
> vsock/virtio: fix potential unbounded skb queue
>
> [ Upstream commit 059b7dbd20a6f0c539a45ddff1573cb8946685b5 ]
>
> virtio_transport_inc_rx_pkt() checks vvs->rx_bytes + len > vvs->buf_alloc.
>
> virtio_transport_recv_enqueue() skips coalescing for packets
> with VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM.
>
> If fed with packets with len == 0 and VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM,
> a very large number of packets can be queued
> because vvs->rx_bytes stays at 0.
>
> Fix this by estimating the skb metadata size:
>
> (Number of skbs in the queue) * SKB_TRUESIZE(0)
>
> Fixes: 077706165717 ("virtio/vsock: don't use skbuff state to account credit")
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
> Cc: Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@sberdevices.ru>
> Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
> Cc: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
> Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
> Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> Cc: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
> Cc: "Eugenio Pérez" <eperezma@redhat.com>
> Cc: virtualization@lists.linux.dev
> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260430122653.554058-1-edumazet@google.com
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
>
> diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
> index 6ea00b8630351..12d5844d98e39 100644
> --- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
> +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
> @@ -254,7 +254,9 @@ static int virtio_transport_send_pkt_info(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
> static bool virtio_transport_inc_rx_pkt(struct virtio_vsock_sock *vvs,
> u32 len)
> {
> - if (vvs->rx_bytes + len > vvs->buf_alloc)
> + u64 skb_overhead = (skb_queue_len(&vvs->rx_queue) + 1) * SKB_TRUESIZE(0);
> +
> + if (skb_overhead + vvs->rx_bytes + len > vvs->buf_alloc)
> return false;
>
> vvs->rx_bytes += len;
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Patch "vsock/virtio: fix potential unbounded skb queue" has been added to the 6.1-stable tree
2026-10-19 13:48 ` Patch "vsock/virtio: fix potential unbounded skb queue" has been added to the 6.1-stable tree Stefano Garzarella
@ 2026-10-19 16:54 ` Sasha Levin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Sasha Levin @ 2026-10-19 16:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stefano Garzarella
Cc: Sasha Levin, stable, stable-commits, edumazet, Michael S. Tsirkin,
Jason Wang, Eugenio Pérez, Xuan Zhuo, Stefan Hajnoczi,
David S. Miller, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Simon Horman
On Mon, Oct 19, 2026 at 03:48:24PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> Be careful with this patch, this caused data loss. It's fixed upstream
> by commits:
[...]
> So if you want to backport this patch, I strongly recommend that you
> include these others as well in the same backport.
Thanks. Dropped from the 6.1 queue. c6087c5aaad6 and 2a12c05aef21 don't
apply to 6.1 without rework, so the full set can't be taken there as-is.
--
Thanks,
Sasha
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-10-19 16:54 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20261018131321.3798770-1-sashal@kernel.org>
2026-10-19 13:48 ` Patch "vsock/virtio: fix potential unbounded skb queue" has been added to the 6.1-stable tree Stefano Garzarella
2026-10-19 16:54 ` Sasha Levin
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox