Linux maintainer tooling and workflows
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
To: "Kernel.org Tools" <tools@kernel.org>
Cc: "Christian Brauner (Amutable)" <brauner@kernel.org>,
	 Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH b4 26/27] tests: cover the review send's post-send bookkeeping
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2026 11:21:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260731-work-b4-editor-branch-guard-v1-26-de68a7c8e4cb@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260731-work-b4-editor-branch-guard-v1-0-de68a7c8e4cb@kernel.org>

Both halves of what the maintainer is told once the mail is gone. A
tracking write that fails quietly is reported instead, and neither that
nor a bookkeeping step that raises comes back as "Send failed".

Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner (Amutable) <brauner@kernel.org>
---
 src/tests/test_tui_review.py | 87 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 87 insertions(+)

diff --git a/src/tests/test_tui_review.py b/src/tests/test_tui_review.py
index 8ac6113..8250e1e 100644
--- a/src/tests/test_tui_review.py
+++ b/src/tests/test_tui_review.py
@@ -662,3 +662,90 @@ class TestBranchRestore:
         app._restore_original_branch()
         assert b4.git_get_current_branch(gitdir) == 'master'
         assert app.branch_checked_out is False
+
+
+class TestSendBookkeeping:
+    """Everything after the SMTP handoff is bookkeeping, and bookkeeping must
+    never be able to claim the send failed."""
+
+    async def _send(
+        self, gitdir: str, change_id: str, **patches: Any
+    ) -> Tuple[List[str], bool]:
+        """Drive action_send with a staged review and a send that succeeds.
+
+        *patches* are extra mock.patch.object() keyword targets on the app.
+        Returns (notification texts, app still running).
+        """
+        import contextlib
+
+        branch, _shas = _create_review_branch_with_patches(
+            gitdir, change_id, ['patch 1']
+        )
+        session = _build_session(gitdir, branch)
+        app = ReviewApp(session)
+        my_email = str(session['usercfg']['email'])
+
+        async with app.run_test(size=(120, 30)) as pilot:
+            await pilot.pause()
+            app._patches[0]['reviews'] = {
+                my_email: {
+                    'reply': 'Looks good.',
+                    'trailers': ['Reviewed-by: Me <me@example.com>'],
+                    'patch-state': 'done',
+                }
+            }
+            with contextlib.ExitStack() as stack:
+                stack.enter_context(
+                    mock.patch.object(app, 'suspend', lambda: contextlib.nullcontext())
+                )
+
+                # SendScreen is a confirmation dialog; answer yes for it.
+                def _confirm(screen: Any, callback: Any = None) -> None:
+                    assert callback is not None
+                    callback(True)
+
+                stack.enter_context(mock.patch.object(app, 'push_screen', _confirm))
+                stack.enter_context(mock.patch('b4.get_smtp', return_value=(None, 'm')))
+                stack.enter_context(mock.patch('b4.send_mail', return_value=1))
+                stack.enter_context(
+                    mock.patch('b4.review_tui._review_app.mark_outgoing_seen')
+                )
+                stack.enter_context(mock.patch.object(app, '_mark_patches_answered'))
+                for name, kwargs in patches.items():
+                    stack.enter_context(mock.patch.object(app, name, **kwargs))
+                notified = stack.enter_context(mock.patch.object(app, 'notify'))
+                app.action_send()
+                await pilot.pause()
+            texts = [str(call.args[0]) for call in notified.call_args_list]
+            return texts, app.is_running
+
+    @pytest.mark.asyncio
+    async def test_unwritable_tracking_is_reported_but_not_as_a_send_failure(
+        self, gitdir: str
+    ) -> None:
+        """save_tracking_ref() returns False rather than raising, so this used
+        to pass unnoticed -- and the next session would offer the same reviews
+        as unsent, inviting the maintainer to send them twice."""
+        texts, running = await self._send(
+            gitdir, 'send-notracking', _save_tracking={'return_value': False}
+        )
+        assert running
+        assert any('Sent 1 review email' in t for t in texts)
+        assert not any('Send failed' in t for t in texts)
+        assert any('could not record it' in t for t in texts)
+
+    @pytest.mark.asyncio
+    async def test_raising_bookkeeping_is_not_a_send_failure(self, gitdir: str) -> None:
+        """The mail is on the list by then; reporting 'Send failed' would tell
+        the maintainer to send it again."""
+        texts, running = await self._send(
+            gitdir,
+            'send-bookkeeping-boom',
+            _mark_patches_answered={
+                'side_effect': OSError(28, 'No space left on device')
+            },
+        )
+        assert running
+        assert any('Sent 1 review email' in t for t in texts)
+        assert not any('Send failed' in t for t in texts)
+        assert any('No space left on device' in t for t in texts)

-- 
2.53.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-07-31  9:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-31  9:20 [PATCH b4 00/27] Stop the editor branch guard from eating review replies Christian Brauner
2026-07-31  9:21 ` [PATCH b4 01/27] review-tui: mark all outgoing mail as read, not just " Christian Brauner
2026-07-31  9:21 ` [PATCH b4 02/27] tests: cover the shared outgoing-seen helper Christian Brauner
2026-07-31  9:21 ` [PATCH b4 03/27] review: close the messages database when auto-marking fails Christian Brauner
2026-07-31  9:21 ` [PATCH b4 04/27] review: use the same busy timeout for both review databases Christian Brauner
2026-07-31  9:21 ` [PATCH b4 05/27] review: drop the unused return value from set_flags_bulk() Christian Brauner
2026-07-31  9:21 ` [PATCH b4 06/27] review: don't let archiving a series raise Christian Brauner
2026-07-31  9:21 ` [PATCH b4 07/27] tests: cover an unwritable series archive Christian Brauner
2026-07-31  9:21 ` [PATCH b4 08/27] review-tui: keep post-send bookkeeping out of the send error path Christian Brauner
2026-07-31  9:21 ` [PATCH b4 09/27] tests: cover the thank-you send's post-send bookkeeping Christian Brauner
2026-07-31  9:21 ` [PATCH b4 10/27] review-tui: say when a take didn't complete Christian Brauner
2026-07-31  9:21 ` [PATCH b4 11/27] tests: cover the unaccepted take in the thank-and-archive chain Christian Brauner
2026-07-31  9:21 ` [PATCH b4 12/27] review-tui: use the shared helper to delete a review branch Christian Brauner
2026-07-31  9:21 ` [PATCH b4 13/27] ty: check reachability in the repository the commit landed in Christian Brauner
2026-07-31  9:21 ` [PATCH b4 14/27] tests: cover the publish check using the repository it is given Christian Brauner
2026-07-31  9:21 ` [PATCH b4 15/27] edit_in_editor: make the branch guard opt-in Christian Brauner
2026-07-31  9:21 ` [PATCH b4 16/27] tests: cover the opt-in branch guard in edit_in_editor Christian Brauner
2026-07-31  9:21 ` [PATCH b4 17/27] edit_in_editor: work in the tree the caller names Christian Brauner
2026-07-31  9:21 ` [PATCH b4 18/27] tests: cover edit_in_editor working in the caller's tree Christian Brauner
2026-07-31  9:21 ` [PATCH b4 19/27] tui: route editor launches through one non-fatal helper Christian Brauner
2026-07-31  9:21 ` [PATCH b4 20/27] tests: cover an editor failure leaving the review TUI standing Christian Brauner
2026-07-31  9:21 ` [PATCH b4 21/27] review-tui: only put back a branch b4 checked out itself Christian Brauner
2026-07-31  9:21 ` [PATCH b4 22/27] tests: cover the review TUI's branch-restore guard Christian Brauner
2026-07-31  9:21 ` [PATCH b4 23/27] tests: pin the default branch in the queue-delivery fixture Christian Brauner
2026-07-31  9:21 ` [PATCH b4 24/27] ty: an unknown remote tip is undetermined, not unpublished Christian Brauner
2026-07-31  9:21 ` [PATCH b4 25/27] review-tui: keep post-send bookkeeping out of the review send error path Christian Brauner
2026-07-31  9:21 ` Christian Brauner [this message]
2026-07-31  9:21 ` [PATCH b4 27/27] review: close the tracking database when archiving fails Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 13:14 ` [PATCH b4 00/27] Stop the editor branch guard from eating review replies Christian Brauner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260731-work-b4-editor-branch-guard-v1-26-de68a7c8e4cb@kernel.org \
    --to=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=konstantin@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=tools@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox