From: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
To: "Kernel.org Tools" <tools@kernel.org>
Cc: "Christian Brauner (Amutable)" <brauner@kernel.org>,
Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH b4 26/27] tests: cover the review send's post-send bookkeeping
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2026 11:21:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260731-work-b4-editor-branch-guard-v1-26-de68a7c8e4cb@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260731-work-b4-editor-branch-guard-v1-0-de68a7c8e4cb@kernel.org>
Both halves of what the maintainer is told once the mail is gone. A
tracking write that fails quietly is reported instead, and neither that
nor a bookkeeping step that raises comes back as "Send failed".
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner (Amutable) <brauner@kernel.org>
---
src/tests/test_tui_review.py | 87 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 87 insertions(+)
diff --git a/src/tests/test_tui_review.py b/src/tests/test_tui_review.py
index 8ac6113..8250e1e 100644
--- a/src/tests/test_tui_review.py
+++ b/src/tests/test_tui_review.py
@@ -662,3 +662,90 @@ class TestBranchRestore:
app._restore_original_branch()
assert b4.git_get_current_branch(gitdir) == 'master'
assert app.branch_checked_out is False
+
+
+class TestSendBookkeeping:
+ """Everything after the SMTP handoff is bookkeeping, and bookkeeping must
+ never be able to claim the send failed."""
+
+ async def _send(
+ self, gitdir: str, change_id: str, **patches: Any
+ ) -> Tuple[List[str], bool]:
+ """Drive action_send with a staged review and a send that succeeds.
+
+ *patches* are extra mock.patch.object() keyword targets on the app.
+ Returns (notification texts, app still running).
+ """
+ import contextlib
+
+ branch, _shas = _create_review_branch_with_patches(
+ gitdir, change_id, ['patch 1']
+ )
+ session = _build_session(gitdir, branch)
+ app = ReviewApp(session)
+ my_email = str(session['usercfg']['email'])
+
+ async with app.run_test(size=(120, 30)) as pilot:
+ await pilot.pause()
+ app._patches[0]['reviews'] = {
+ my_email: {
+ 'reply': 'Looks good.',
+ 'trailers': ['Reviewed-by: Me <me@example.com>'],
+ 'patch-state': 'done',
+ }
+ }
+ with contextlib.ExitStack() as stack:
+ stack.enter_context(
+ mock.patch.object(app, 'suspend', lambda: contextlib.nullcontext())
+ )
+
+ # SendScreen is a confirmation dialog; answer yes for it.
+ def _confirm(screen: Any, callback: Any = None) -> None:
+ assert callback is not None
+ callback(True)
+
+ stack.enter_context(mock.patch.object(app, 'push_screen', _confirm))
+ stack.enter_context(mock.patch('b4.get_smtp', return_value=(None, 'm')))
+ stack.enter_context(mock.patch('b4.send_mail', return_value=1))
+ stack.enter_context(
+ mock.patch('b4.review_tui._review_app.mark_outgoing_seen')
+ )
+ stack.enter_context(mock.patch.object(app, '_mark_patches_answered'))
+ for name, kwargs in patches.items():
+ stack.enter_context(mock.patch.object(app, name, **kwargs))
+ notified = stack.enter_context(mock.patch.object(app, 'notify'))
+ app.action_send()
+ await pilot.pause()
+ texts = [str(call.args[0]) for call in notified.call_args_list]
+ return texts, app.is_running
+
+ @pytest.mark.asyncio
+ async def test_unwritable_tracking_is_reported_but_not_as_a_send_failure(
+ self, gitdir: str
+ ) -> None:
+ """save_tracking_ref() returns False rather than raising, so this used
+ to pass unnoticed -- and the next session would offer the same reviews
+ as unsent, inviting the maintainer to send them twice."""
+ texts, running = await self._send(
+ gitdir, 'send-notracking', _save_tracking={'return_value': False}
+ )
+ assert running
+ assert any('Sent 1 review email' in t for t in texts)
+ assert not any('Send failed' in t for t in texts)
+ assert any('could not record it' in t for t in texts)
+
+ @pytest.mark.asyncio
+ async def test_raising_bookkeeping_is_not_a_send_failure(self, gitdir: str) -> None:
+ """The mail is on the list by then; reporting 'Send failed' would tell
+ the maintainer to send it again."""
+ texts, running = await self._send(
+ gitdir,
+ 'send-bookkeeping-boom',
+ _mark_patches_answered={
+ 'side_effect': OSError(28, 'No space left on device')
+ },
+ )
+ assert running
+ assert any('Sent 1 review email' in t for t in texts)
+ assert not any('Send failed' in t for t in texts)
+ assert any('No space left on device' in t for t in texts)
--
2.53.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-31 9:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-31 9:20 [PATCH b4 00/27] Stop the editor branch guard from eating review replies Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 9:21 ` [PATCH b4 01/27] review-tui: mark all outgoing mail as read, not just " Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 9:21 ` [PATCH b4 02/27] tests: cover the shared outgoing-seen helper Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 9:21 ` [PATCH b4 03/27] review: close the messages database when auto-marking fails Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 9:21 ` [PATCH b4 04/27] review: use the same busy timeout for both review databases Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 9:21 ` [PATCH b4 05/27] review: drop the unused return value from set_flags_bulk() Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 9:21 ` [PATCH b4 06/27] review: don't let archiving a series raise Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 9:21 ` [PATCH b4 07/27] tests: cover an unwritable series archive Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 9:21 ` [PATCH b4 08/27] review-tui: keep post-send bookkeeping out of the send error path Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 9:21 ` [PATCH b4 09/27] tests: cover the thank-you send's post-send bookkeeping Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 9:21 ` [PATCH b4 10/27] review-tui: say when a take didn't complete Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 9:21 ` [PATCH b4 11/27] tests: cover the unaccepted take in the thank-and-archive chain Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 9:21 ` [PATCH b4 12/27] review-tui: use the shared helper to delete a review branch Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 9:21 ` [PATCH b4 13/27] ty: check reachability in the repository the commit landed in Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 9:21 ` [PATCH b4 14/27] tests: cover the publish check using the repository it is given Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 9:21 ` [PATCH b4 15/27] edit_in_editor: make the branch guard opt-in Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 9:21 ` [PATCH b4 16/27] tests: cover the opt-in branch guard in edit_in_editor Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 9:21 ` [PATCH b4 17/27] edit_in_editor: work in the tree the caller names Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 9:21 ` [PATCH b4 18/27] tests: cover edit_in_editor working in the caller's tree Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 9:21 ` [PATCH b4 19/27] tui: route editor launches through one non-fatal helper Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 9:21 ` [PATCH b4 20/27] tests: cover an editor failure leaving the review TUI standing Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 9:21 ` [PATCH b4 21/27] review-tui: only put back a branch b4 checked out itself Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 9:21 ` [PATCH b4 22/27] tests: cover the review TUI's branch-restore guard Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 9:21 ` [PATCH b4 23/27] tests: pin the default branch in the queue-delivery fixture Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 9:21 ` [PATCH b4 24/27] ty: an unknown remote tip is undetermined, not unpublished Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 9:21 ` [PATCH b4 25/27] review-tui: keep post-send bookkeeping out of the review send error path Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 9:21 ` Christian Brauner [this message]
2026-07-31 9:21 ` [PATCH b4 27/27] review: close the tracking database when archiving fails Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 13:14 ` [PATCH b4 00/27] Stop the editor branch guard from eating review replies Christian Brauner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260731-work-b4-editor-branch-guard-v1-26-de68a7c8e4cb@kernel.org \
--to=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=konstantin@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=tools@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox