Linux maintainer tooling and workflows
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
To: "Kernel.org Tools" <tools@kernel.org>
Cc: "Christian Brauner (Amutable)" <brauner@kernel.org>,
	 Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH b4 05/27] review: drop the unused return value from set_flags_bulk()
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2026 11:21:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260731-work-b4-editor-branch-guard-v1-5-de68a7c8e4cb@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260731-work-b4-editor-branch-guard-v1-0-de68a7c8e4cb@kernel.org>

set_flags_bulk() returns the number of messages that didn't already
carry the flag. Nothing uses it. The unread badge accounting it was
added for ended up taking its count from get_flags_bulk() instead, over
the messages that are new to the thread, which is a different number.

An unused return value still reads like a contract callers may rely on
and the next person has to work out that none do. Take it back out. Keep
the early continue it brought with it. A row the INSERT just created
already carries exactly this flag, so there is nothing for the
read-modify-write below to do.

Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner (Amutable) <brauner@kernel.org>
---
 src/b4/review/messages.py  |  8 ++------
 src/tests/test_messages.py | 44 --------------------------------------------
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/b4/review/messages.py b/src/b4/review/messages.py
index a73e986..b388d93 100644
--- a/src/b4/review/messages.py
+++ b/src/b4/review/messages.py
@@ -102,13 +102,11 @@ def set_flag(
 
 def set_flags_bulk(
     conn: sqlite3.Connection, entries: List[Dict[str, Optional[str]]], flag: str
-) -> int:
+) -> None:
     """Add *flag* to multiple messages in one transaction.
 
     Each entry in *entries* is ``{'msgid': ..., 'msg_date': ...}``.
-    Returns the number of messages that did not have *flag* before.
     """
-    newly_flagged = 0
     for entry in entries:
         msgid = entry.get('msgid', '')
         msg_date = entry.get('msg_date')
@@ -121,7 +119,7 @@ def set_flags_bulk(
             (msgid, msg_date, flag),
         )
         if cursor.rowcount > 0:
-            newly_flagged += 1
+            # Row created carrying exactly this flag; nothing to merge
             continue
         row = conn.execute(
             'SELECT flags FROM messages WHERE msgid = ?', (msgid,)
@@ -130,13 +128,11 @@ def set_flags_bulk(
             existing = set(row[0].split())
             if flag not in existing:
                 existing.add(flag)
-                newly_flagged += 1
                 conn.execute(
                     'UPDATE messages SET flags = ? WHERE msgid = ?',
                     (' '.join(sorted(existing)), msgid),
                 )
     conn.commit()
-    return newly_flagged
 
 
 def remove_flag(conn: sqlite3.Connection, msgid: str, flag: str) -> None:
diff --git a/src/tests/test_messages.py b/src/tests/test_messages.py
index 904776d..14e1743 100644
--- a/src/tests/test_messages.py
+++ b/src/tests/test_messages.py
@@ -222,50 +222,6 @@ class TestCleanupOld:
         conn.close()
 
 
-class TestSetFlagsBulkReturnValue:
-    """Tests for the newly-flagged count returned by set_flags_bulk()."""
-
-    def test_counts_new_rows(self, tmp_path: pytest.TempPathFactory) -> None:
-        conn = messages.get_db()
-        entries: List[Dict[str, Optional[str]]] = [
-            {'msgid': 'n1@example.com', 'msg_date': None},
-            {'msgid': 'n2@example.com', 'msg_date': None},
-        ]
-        assert messages.set_flags_bulk(conn, entries, 'Seen') == 2
-        conn.close()
-
-    def test_repeat_is_zero(self, tmp_path: pytest.TempPathFactory) -> None:
-        conn = messages.get_db()
-        entries: List[Dict[str, Optional[str]]] = [
-            {'msgid': 'r1@example.com', 'msg_date': None},
-        ]
-        messages.set_flags_bulk(conn, entries, 'Seen')
-        assert messages.set_flags_bulk(conn, entries, 'Seen') == 0
-        conn.close()
-
-    def test_mixed_new_and_existing(self, tmp_path: pytest.TempPathFactory) -> None:
-        conn = messages.get_db()
-        first: List[Dict[str, Optional[str]]] = [
-            {'msgid': 'm1@example.com', 'msg_date': None},
-        ]
-        messages.set_flags_bulk(conn, first, 'Seen')
-        both: List[Dict[str, Optional[str]]] = [
-            {'msgid': 'm1@example.com', 'msg_date': None},
-            {'msgid': 'm2@example.com', 'msg_date': None},
-        ]
-        assert messages.set_flags_bulk(conn, both, 'Seen') == 1
-        conn.close()
-
-    def test_new_flag_on_existing_row(self, tmp_path: pytest.TempPathFactory) -> None:
-        conn = messages.get_db()
-        entries: List[Dict[str, Optional[str]]] = [
-            {'msgid': 'f1@example.com', 'msg_date': None},
-        ]
-        messages.set_flags_bulk(conn, entries, 'Seen')
-        assert messages.set_flags_bulk(conn, entries, 'Answered') == 1
-        conn.close()
-
-
 class TestMarkOutgoingSeen:
     """Tests for mark_outgoing_seen()."""
 

-- 
2.53.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-07-31  9:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-31  9:20 [PATCH b4 00/27] Stop the editor branch guard from eating review replies Christian Brauner
2026-07-31  9:21 ` [PATCH b4 01/27] review-tui: mark all outgoing mail as read, not just " Christian Brauner
2026-07-31  9:21 ` [PATCH b4 02/27] tests: cover the shared outgoing-seen helper Christian Brauner
2026-07-31  9:21 ` [PATCH b4 03/27] review: close the messages database when auto-marking fails Christian Brauner
2026-07-31  9:21 ` [PATCH b4 04/27] review: use the same busy timeout for both review databases Christian Brauner
2026-07-31  9:21 ` Christian Brauner [this message]
2026-07-31  9:21 ` [PATCH b4 06/27] review: don't let archiving a series raise Christian Brauner
2026-07-31  9:21 ` [PATCH b4 07/27] tests: cover an unwritable series archive Christian Brauner
2026-07-31  9:21 ` [PATCH b4 08/27] review-tui: keep post-send bookkeeping out of the send error path Christian Brauner
2026-07-31  9:21 ` [PATCH b4 09/27] tests: cover the thank-you send's post-send bookkeeping Christian Brauner
2026-07-31  9:21 ` [PATCH b4 10/27] review-tui: say when a take didn't complete Christian Brauner
2026-07-31  9:21 ` [PATCH b4 11/27] tests: cover the unaccepted take in the thank-and-archive chain Christian Brauner
2026-07-31  9:21 ` [PATCH b4 12/27] review-tui: use the shared helper to delete a review branch Christian Brauner
2026-07-31  9:21 ` [PATCH b4 13/27] ty: check reachability in the repository the commit landed in Christian Brauner
2026-07-31  9:21 ` [PATCH b4 14/27] tests: cover the publish check using the repository it is given Christian Brauner
2026-07-31  9:21 ` [PATCH b4 15/27] edit_in_editor: make the branch guard opt-in Christian Brauner
2026-07-31  9:21 ` [PATCH b4 16/27] tests: cover the opt-in branch guard in edit_in_editor Christian Brauner
2026-07-31  9:21 ` [PATCH b4 17/27] edit_in_editor: work in the tree the caller names Christian Brauner
2026-07-31  9:21 ` [PATCH b4 18/27] tests: cover edit_in_editor working in the caller's tree Christian Brauner
2026-07-31  9:21 ` [PATCH b4 19/27] tui: route editor launches through one non-fatal helper Christian Brauner
2026-07-31  9:21 ` [PATCH b4 20/27] tests: cover an editor failure leaving the review TUI standing Christian Brauner
2026-07-31  9:21 ` [PATCH b4 21/27] review-tui: only put back a branch b4 checked out itself Christian Brauner
2026-07-31  9:21 ` [PATCH b4 22/27] tests: cover the review TUI's branch-restore guard Christian Brauner
2026-07-31  9:21 ` [PATCH b4 23/27] tests: pin the default branch in the queue-delivery fixture Christian Brauner
2026-07-31  9:21 ` [PATCH b4 24/27] ty: an unknown remote tip is undetermined, not unpublished Christian Brauner
2026-07-31  9:21 ` [PATCH b4 25/27] review-tui: keep post-send bookkeeping out of the review send error path Christian Brauner
2026-07-31  9:21 ` [PATCH b4 26/27] tests: cover the review send's post-send bookkeeping Christian Brauner
2026-07-31  9:21 ` [PATCH b4 27/27] review: close the tracking database when archiving fails Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 13:14 ` [PATCH b4 00/27] Stop the editor branch guard from eating review replies Christian Brauner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260731-work-b4-editor-branch-guard-v1-5-de68a7c8e4cb@kernel.org \
    --to=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=konstantin@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=tools@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox