public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [Patch v2 3/5] armv8/fsl-lsch3: Release secondary cores from boot hold off with Boot Page
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 12:41:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140822114140.GV21734@leverpostej> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53F63B55.3040900@freescale.com>

Hi York,

> >> -       /*
> >> -        * All processors will enter EL2 and optionally EL1.
> >> +slave_cpu:
> >> +       wfe
> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_FSL_SMP_RELEASE_ALL
> >> +       /* All cores are released from the address in the 1st spin table
> >> +        * element
> >>          */
> >> -       bl      armv8_switch_to_el2
> >> -#ifdef CONFIG_ARMV8_SWITCH_TO_EL1
> >> -       bl      armv8_switch_to_el1
> >> +       ldr     x1, =__spin_table
> >> +       ldr     x0, [x1]
> >> +#else
> >> +       ldr     x0, [x11]
> >> +#endif
> >> +       cbz     x0, slave_cpu
> >
> > Similarly is there any reason to have the option of a single release
> > addr if we can support unique addresses?
> 
> I think it was used by Linux for some ARM parts. I personally not a fun of using
> single release.

That makes two of us. The single release address on those ARM dts is a
legacy mistake that we can't fix up without breaking some models. We
don't need to propagate that mistake to new platforms.

> But if it makes everyone happy, I can keep it.

I'd be happier with CONFIG_FSL_SMP_RELEASE_ALL dropped entirely. Ideally
U-Boot would always provide a unique cpu-release-address for each CPU. 

Thanks,
Mark.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-08-22 11:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-19 20:27 [U-Boot] [Patch v2 1/5] fdt_support: Move of_read_number to fdt_support.h York Sun
2014-08-19 20:27 ` [U-Boot] [Patch v2 2/5] fdt_support: Make of_bus_default_count_cells non static York Sun
2014-08-19 20:28 ` [U-Boot] [Patch v2 3/5] armv8/fsl-lsch3: Release secondary cores from boot hold off with Boot Page York Sun
2014-08-21 13:47   ` Mark Rutland
2014-08-21 18:32     ` York Sun
2014-08-21 18:50       ` bhupesh.sharma at freescale.com
2014-08-22  7:02         ` Arnab Basu
2014-08-22 11:24           ` Mark Rutland
2014-08-22 11:38         ` Mark Rutland
2014-08-22 11:41       ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2014-08-19 20:28 ` [U-Boot] [Patch v2 4/5] ARMv8/ls2085a: Enable secondary cores York Sun
2014-08-19 20:28 ` [U-Boot] [Patch v2 5/5] ARMv8/ls2085a: Move u-boot location to make room for RCW York Sun

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140822114140.GV21734@leverpostej \
    --to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox