[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 4/4] rockchip: enable rockusb for all rockchip SoCs

[Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>]

On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 01:06:55PM +0200, Łukasz Majewski wrote:
> Hi Philipp, Andy, Tom
> >
> >>On 25 Aug 2017, at 03:51, Andy Yan <andyshrk@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>Hi Lukasz:
> >>
> >>2017-08-22 18:05 GMT+08:00 Łukasz Majewski <lukma at denx.de <mailto:lukma@denx.de>>:
> >>Hi Kever,
> >>
> >>
> >>Philipp,
> >>
> >>    I have no idea about the status of rockusb, it has been a long time
> >>on the list.
> >>
> >>Maybe Eddie or Lukasz have an answer?
> >>
> >>I've asked Eddie to fix issues with breaking other boards when enabling USB gadget infrastructure on RK.
> >>
> >>No reply since then.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>Eddie has fix all the issues he can reproduced on local。 The only problem now is that  the rk3036 based boards(evb-rk3036/kylin-rk3036) show compile errors on CI[0],
> >
> >The Travis log shows linker errors for some of the other boards (i.e. not evb-rk3036/kylin-rk3036), due to unresolved symbols.
> 
> Yes, Indeed.
> 
> I've build those boards locally with gcc 6.3 and it was successful.

The same one we use in travis-ci, from Linaro?

> Regarding travis CI:
> 
> With Eddie's patches it shows error:
> https://travis-ci.org/lmajewski/u-boot-dfu/builds/268270904
> 
> However, without Eddie's patches travis-CI doesn't show any errors:
> https://travis-ci.org/lmajewski/u-boot-dfu/builds/268303030
> 
> 
> Let's ask Tom (who has far more experience with travis-CI), if he
> saw something like that before.

Well, travis talks about using docker to replicate their environment,
which means someone should be able to do that, get it to fail in a
debugable environment and then move forward.

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20170826/dcc2250f/attachment.sig>