From: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [PATCH] [RFC] net: smc911x: Drop the standalone EEPROM example
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2020 14:42:17 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200317184217.GW12423@bill-the-cat> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53e05978-b941-08bc-18a7-6551f3cc1e88@gmail.com>
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 07:39:49PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 3/17/20 7:30 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 07:23:07PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >> On 3/17/20 7:10 PM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> >>> On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 8:19 AM Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Drop the example, for two reasons. First, it is tapping directly into
> >>>> the IO accessors of the SMC911x, while it should instead go through
> >>>> the net device API. Second, this makes conversion of the SMC911x driver
> >>>> to DM real hard.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@gmail.com>
> >>>> Cc: Joe Hershberger <joe.hershberger@ni.com>
> >>>> Cc: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> examples/standalone/Makefile | 1 -
> >>>> examples/standalone/smc911x_eeprom.c | 379 ---------------------------
> >>>> 2 files changed, 380 deletions(-)
> >>>> delete mode 100644 examples/standalone/smc911x_eeprom.c
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Yeah, I was disturbed by this example code.
> >>>
> >>> I agree we should drop it.
> >>>
> >>> Reviewed-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
> >>
> >> Well I dunno. Can this be rewritten on top of DM somehow ? Do we even
> >> have U-Boot application API to access DM EEPROM ?
> >
> > We should just drop it I think. The biggest surface we have today for
> > external application is EFI application now, not U-Boot specific API.
> > We can't drop the API but we don't expand it without very good reason.
>
> But this drops the ability to access the SMC911x EEPROM too.
> So maybe we need some DM EEPROM implementation in the SMC911x driver ?
> Does anyone have SMC911x with an external EEPROM ?
All this does is drop an example. I don't see anything removing API
code itself.
--
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 659 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20200317/762ecec8/attachment.sig>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-17 18:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-14 23:18 [PATCH] [RFC] net: smc911x: Drop the standalone EEPROM example Marek Vasut
2020-03-17 17:45 ` Joe Hershberger
2020-03-17 18:10 ` Masahiro Yamada
2020-03-17 18:23 ` Marek Vasut
2020-03-17 18:30 ` Tom Rini
2020-03-17 18:39 ` Marek Vasut
2020-03-17 18:42 ` Tom Rini [this message]
2020-03-17 18:43 ` Marek Vasut
2020-03-17 18:44 ` Tom Rini
2020-03-17 18:53 ` Marek Vasut
2020-03-17 18:54 ` Tom Rini
[not found] ` <CANr=Z=bAAoVsFJcqDYe-9qLrqLu9X0h5e_jqeDKv5bSAP5bGnw@mail.gmail.com>
2020-03-18 0:59 ` Tom Rini
2020-03-18 1:14 ` Joe Hershberger
2020-03-18 1:16 ` Marek Vasut
2020-06-12 21:15 ` Tom Rini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200317184217.GW12423@bill-the-cat \
--to=trini@konsulko.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox