[PATCH] [RFC] net: smc911x: Drop the standalone EEPROM example

[Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>]

On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 07:43:11PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 3/17/20 7:42 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 07:39:49PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >> On 3/17/20 7:30 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 07:23:07PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >>>> On 3/17/20 7:10 PM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> >>>>> On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 8:19 AM Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Drop the example, for two reasons. First, it is tapping directly into
> >>>>>> the IO accessors of the SMC911x, while it should instead go through
> >>>>>> the net device API. Second, this makes conversion of the SMC911x driver
> >>>>>> to DM real hard.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@gmail.com>
> >>>>>> Cc: Joe Hershberger <joe.hershberger@ni.com>
> >>>>>> Cc: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
> >>>>>> ---
> >>>>>>  examples/standalone/Makefile         |   1 -
> >>>>>>  examples/standalone/smc911x_eeprom.c | 379 ---------------------------
> >>>>>>  2 files changed, 380 deletions(-)
> >>>>>>  delete mode 100644 examples/standalone/smc911x_eeprom.c
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Yeah, I was disturbed by this example code.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I agree we should drop it.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Reviewed-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
> >>>>
> >>>> Well I dunno. Can this be rewritten on top of DM somehow ? Do we even
> >>>> have U-Boot application API to access DM EEPROM ?
> >>>
> >>> We should just drop it I think.  The biggest surface we have today for
> >>> external application is EFI application now, not U-Boot specific API.
> >>> We can't drop the API but we don't expand it without very good reason.
> >>
> >> But this drops the ability to access the SMC911x EEPROM too.
> >> So maybe we need some DM EEPROM implementation in the SMC911x driver ?
> >> Does anyone have SMC911x with an external EEPROM ?
> > 
> > All this does is drop an example.  I don't see anything removing API
> > code itself.
> 
> Where did I say anything about API code ?

Nowhere, which is my point.  You're just dropping an example, not the
ability to do $X.

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 659 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20200317/7fe41baa/attachment.sig>