From: "Pierre-Clément Tosi" <ptosi@google.com>
To: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de, Matthias Weisser <weisserm@arcor.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm: Fix bad memcpy.S str8w macro argument count
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2021 15:51:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211110145138.5mdo54smpj4xoaru@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211110141414.GE24579@bill-the-cat>
On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 09:14:14AM -0500, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 03:04:40PM +0100, Pierre-Clément Tosi wrote:
>
> > Remove the extra (empty) argument passed to str8w, causing the following
> > error:
> >
> > <instantiation>:40:47: error: too many positional arguments
> > str8w r0, r3, r4, r5, r6, r7, r8, r9, ip, , abort=19f
> > ^
> > u-boot/arch/arm/lib/memcpy.S:240:5: note: while in macro instantiation
> > 17: forward_copy_shift pull=16 push=16
> > ^
> >
> > Note: no functional change intended.
> >
> > Fixes: d8834a1323af ("arm: Use optimized memcpy and memset from linux")
> > Signed-off-by: Pierre-Clément Tosi <ptosi@google.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/lib/memcpy.S | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/lib/memcpy.S b/arch/arm/lib/memcpy.S
> > index f7fb77235c..eee7a219ce 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/lib/memcpy.S
> > +++ b/arch/arm/lib/memcpy.S
> > @@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ ENTRY(memcpy)
> > orr r9, r9, ip, lspush #\push
> > mov ip, ip, lspull #\pull
> > orr ip, ip, lr, lspush #\push
> > - str8w r0, r3, r4, r5, r6, r7, r8, r9, ip, , abort=19f
> > + str8w r0, r3, r4, r5, r6, r7, r8, r9, ip, abort=19f
> > bge 12b
> > PLD( cmn r2, #96 )
> > PLD( bge 13b )
>
> Since this code is both taken from Linux, and likely in need of a
> re-sync with Linux, has this issue been addressed upstream? Or no
> longer present? Thanks.
>
> --
> Tom
In a way, both; it is no longer present in memcpy.S because that file now uses
the shared implementation from copy_template.S but that particular line was
fixed in the same way (and funnily enough with a similar commit message) more
than 2 years ago in baf2df8e15be22b8bd24bdd6fd4575b6641bcfd1 ("ARM: 8827/1: fix
argument count to match macro definition").
Therefore, re-syncing would certainly solve the issue.
--
Pierre
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-10 14:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-10 14:04 [PATCH] arm: Fix bad memcpy.S str8w macro argument count Pierre-Clément Tosi
2021-11-10 14:14 ` Tom Rini
2021-11-10 14:51 ` Pierre-Clément Tosi [this message]
2021-11-10 14:58 ` Tom Rini
2021-11-16 19:26 ` Tom Rini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211110145138.5mdo54smpj4xoaru@google.com \
--to=ptosi@google.com \
--cc=trini@konsulko.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
--cc=weisserm@arcor.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox