From: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
To: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>,
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>,
u-boot@lists.denx.de, sjg@chromium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] efi_loader: PARTITION_UUIDS should be optional
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2022 09:13:49 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220421131349.GZ3045430@bill-the-cat> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220421004011.GB7584@laputa>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3432 bytes --]
On Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 09:57:50AM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 09:37:39AM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> > On 4/19/22 03:01, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> > > In the current implementation, partition table support (either GPT or DOS)
> > > is not mandatory. So CONFIG_PARTITION_UUIDS should not be enabled
> > > (selected) unconditionally.
> > >
> > > Fixes: commit 17f8cda505e3 ("efi_loader: set partition GUID in device path for SIG_TYPE_GUID")
> > > Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>
> > > ---
> > > lib/efi_loader/Kconfig | 2 +-
> > > lib/efi_loader/efi_device_path.c | 11 ++++++++++-
> > > 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/lib/efi_loader/Kconfig b/lib/efi_loader/Kconfig
> > > index d50cd2563d3d..bc518d7a413b 100644
> > > --- a/lib/efi_loader/Kconfig
> > > +++ b/lib/efi_loader/Kconfig
> > > @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ config EFI_LOADER
> > > depends on !EFI_APP
> > > default y if !ARM || SYS_CPU = armv7 || SYS_CPU = armv8
> > > select LIB_UUID
> > > - select PARTITION_UUIDS
> > > + imply PARTITION_UUIDS
> > > select HAVE_BLOCK_DEVICE
> > > select REGEX
> > > imply FAT
> > > diff --git a/lib/efi_loader/efi_device_path.c b/lib/efi_loader/efi_device_path.c
> > > index 0542aaae16c7..01fb53ae8c40 100644
> > > --- a/lib/efi_loader/efi_device_path.c
> > > +++ b/lib/efi_loader/efi_device_path.c
> > > @@ -864,11 +864,20 @@ static void *dp_part_node(void *buf, struct blk_desc *desc, int part)
> > > break;
> > > case SIG_TYPE_GUID:
> >
> > This can only be reached for CONFIG_EFI_PARTITION=y.
>
> I know, but the code won't be exercised anyway if !CONFIG_EFI_PARTITION.
>
> > > hddp->signature_type = 2;
> > > +#if CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(PARTITION_UUIDS)
> > > + /* info.uuid exists only with PARTITION_UUIDS */
> > > if (uuid_str_to_bin(info.uuid,
> > > - hddp->partition_signature, 1))
> > > + hddp->partition_signature, 1)) {
> >
> > uuid_guid_get_bin() does not write any byte if info.uuid is not valid.
>
> What matters here is that "uuid" in struct disk_partition is defined
> only if CONFIG_PARTITION_UUIDS.
>
> > > log_warning(
> > > "Partition no. %d: invalid guid: %s\n",
> > > part, info.uuid);
> >
> > > + memset(hddp->partition_signature, 0,
> > > + sizeof(hddp->partition_signature));
> >
> > dp_alloc() already has zeroed out the memory. Please, remove the
> > superfluous code.
> >
> > > + }
> > > +#else
> > > + memset(hddp->partition_signature, 0,
> > > + sizeof(hddp->partition_signature));
> >
> > ditto.
> >
> >
> > This does not conform to the UEFI specification. Why should we support it?
>
> As I said in my previous comment at patch#6,
> CONFIG_EFI_PARTITION can be seen optional under the current implementation.
>
> >
> > Shouldn't we select CONFIG_PARTITION_UUIDS if CONFIG_EFI_LOADER=y and
> > CONFIG_EFI_PARTITION=y.
>
> Unfortunately some platforms enable (in other words, "select") PARTITION_UUIDS
> unconditionally even without explicitly enabling EFI_LOADER or EFI_PARTITION.
I wouldn't assume that they're correct in doing so and it might have
been how some other problem was addressed at the time to fix incorrect /
not yet implemented in Kconfig at the time dependencies.
--
Tom
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 659 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-21 13:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-19 1:01 [PATCH 0/7] disk: don't compile in partition support for spl/tpl if not really necessary AKASHI Takahiro
2022-04-19 1:01 ` [PATCH 1/7] disk: include errno.h explicitly in part.h AKASHI Takahiro
2022-04-19 1:01 ` [PATCH 2/7] disk: enable function prototypes in part.h for SPL/TPL AKASHI Takahiro
2022-04-19 1:01 ` [PATCH 3/7] disk: define nullified functions for !PARTITIONS AKASHI Takahiro
2022-04-19 3:09 ` Tom Rini
2022-04-19 4:11 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2022-04-19 12:12 ` Tom Rini
2022-04-20 2:17 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2022-04-20 2:50 ` Tom Rini
2022-04-19 1:01 ` [PATCH 4/7] sandbox: move a function prototype AKASHI Takahiro
2022-04-19 1:01 ` [PATCH 5/7] efi_loader: PARTITION_UUIDS should be optional AKASHI Takahiro
2022-04-20 7:37 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2022-04-21 0:57 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2022-04-21 13:13 ` Tom Rini [this message]
2022-04-19 1:01 ` [PATCH 6/7] efi_loader: disk: compile efi_disk when CONFIG_BLK AKASHI Takahiro
2022-04-20 7:42 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2022-04-21 0:30 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2022-04-23 20:08 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2022-04-19 1:01 ` [PATCH 7/7] disk: don't compile in partition support for spl/tpl if not really necessary AKASHI Takahiro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220421131349.GZ3045430@bill-the-cat \
--to=trini@konsulko.com \
--cc=sjg@chromium.org \
--cc=takahiro.akashi@linaro.org \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
--cc=xypron.glpk@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox