* [PATCH] spl: spl_legacy: Fix spl_end address for non ARM target
@ 2023-07-31 6:19 Shiji Yang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Shiji Yang @ 2023-07-31 6:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Cc: Marek Vasut, Dai Okamura, Michael Trimarchi, Fabio Estevam,
Roger Quadros, Simon Glass, Shiji Yang
Only ARM target defines _image_binary_end symbol as char*, All other
targets define it as an ulong type in include/asm-generic/sections.h.
This patch fixes the boot failure on MIPS target. Error log:
SPL: Image overlaps SPL
Fixes: 1b8a1be1a1f1 ("spl: spl_legacy: Fix spl_end address")
Signed-off-by: Shiji Yang <yangshiji66@outlook.com>
---
common/spl/spl_legacy.c | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/common/spl/spl_legacy.c b/common/spl/spl_legacy.c
index 095443c63d..0fef890384 100644
--- a/common/spl/spl_legacy.c
+++ b/common/spl/spl_legacy.c
@@ -18,9 +18,13 @@
static void spl_parse_legacy_validate(uintptr_t start, uintptr_t size)
{
+ uintptr_t end = start + size;
uintptr_t spl_start = (uintptr_t)_start;
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARM
uintptr_t spl_end = (uintptr_t)_image_binary_end;
- uintptr_t end = start + size;
+#else
+ uintptr_t spl_end = (uintptr_t)&_image_binary_end;
+#endif /* CONFIG_ARM */
if ((start >= spl_start && start < spl_end) ||
(end > spl_start && end <= spl_end) ||
--
2.39.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] spl: spl_legacy: Fix spl_end address for non ARM target
@ 2023-07-31 11:57 Shiji Yang
2023-07-31 14:17 ` Marek Vasut
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Shiji Yang @ 2023-07-31 11:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Cc: Marek Vasut, Dai Okamura, Michael Trimarchi, Fabio Estevam,
Roger Quadros, Simon Glass, Shiji Yang
Only ARM target defines _image_binary_end symbol as char*, All other
targets define it as an ulong type in include/asm-generic/sections.h.
This patch fixes the boot failure on MIPS target. Error log:
SPL: Image overlaps SPL
Fixes: 1b8a1be1a1f1 ("spl: spl_legacy: Fix spl_end address")
Signed-off-by: Shiji Yang <yangshiji66@outlook.com>
---
common/spl/spl_legacy.c | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/common/spl/spl_legacy.c b/common/spl/spl_legacy.c
index 095443c63d..0fef890384 100644
--- a/common/spl/spl_legacy.c
+++ b/common/spl/spl_legacy.c
@@ -18,9 +18,13 @@
static void spl_parse_legacy_validate(uintptr_t start, uintptr_t size)
{
+ uintptr_t end = start + size;
uintptr_t spl_start = (uintptr_t)_start;
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARM
uintptr_t spl_end = (uintptr_t)_image_binary_end;
- uintptr_t end = start + size;
+#else
+ uintptr_t spl_end = (uintptr_t)&_image_binary_end;
+#endif /* CONFIG_ARM */
if ((start >= spl_start && start < spl_end) ||
(end > spl_start && end <= spl_end) ||
--
2.39.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] spl: spl_legacy: Fix spl_end address for non ARM target
2023-07-31 11:57 [PATCH] spl: spl_legacy: Fix spl_end address for non ARM target Shiji Yang
@ 2023-07-31 14:17 ` Marek Vasut
2023-07-31 16:10 ` Shiji Yang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Marek Vasut @ 2023-07-31 14:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Shiji Yang, u-boot
Cc: Dai Okamura, Michael Trimarchi, Fabio Estevam, Roger Quadros,
Simon Glass
On 7/31/23 13:57, Shiji Yang wrote:
> Only ARM target defines _image_binary_end symbol as char*, All other
> targets define it as an ulong type in include/asm-generic/sections.h.
>
> This patch fixes the boot failure on MIPS target. Error log:
> SPL: Image overlaps SPL
>
> Fixes: 1b8a1be1a1f1 ("spl: spl_legacy: Fix spl_end address")
> Signed-off-by: Shiji Yang <yangshiji66@outlook.com>
> ---
> common/spl/spl_legacy.c | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/common/spl/spl_legacy.c b/common/spl/spl_legacy.c
> index 095443c63d..0fef890384 100644
> --- a/common/spl/spl_legacy.c
> +++ b/common/spl/spl_legacy.c
> @@ -18,9 +18,13 @@
>
> static void spl_parse_legacy_validate(uintptr_t start, uintptr_t size)
> {
> + uintptr_t end = start + size;
> uintptr_t spl_start = (uintptr_t)_start;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM
> uintptr_t spl_end = (uintptr_t)_image_binary_end;
> - uintptr_t end = start + size;
> +#else
> + uintptr_t spl_end = (uintptr_t)&_image_binary_end;
I _think_ only this extra & should be enough and that should also work
on ARM, right ?
[...]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] spl: spl_legacy: Fix spl_end address for non ARM target
2023-07-31 14:17 ` Marek Vasut
@ 2023-07-31 16:10 ` Shiji Yang
2023-07-31 19:12 ` Tom Rini
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Shiji Yang @ 2023-07-31 16:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: marex; +Cc: festevam, michael, okamura.dai, rogerq, sjg, u-boot
On Mon, 31 Jul 2023 16:17:39 +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
>On 7/31/23 13:57, Shiji Yang wrote:
>> Only ARM target defines _image_binary_end symbol as char*, All other
>> targets define it as an ulong type in include/asm-generic/sections.h.
>>
>> This patch fixes the boot failure on MIPS target. Error log:
>> SPL: Image overlaps SPL
>>
>> Fixes: 1b8a1be1a1f1 ("spl: spl_legacy: Fix spl_end address")
>> Signed-off-by: Shiji Yang <yangshiji66@outlook.com>
>> ---
>> common/spl/spl_legacy.c | 6 +++++-
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/common/spl/spl_legacy.c b/common/spl/spl_legacy.c
>> index 095443c63d..0fef890384 100644
>> --- a/common/spl/spl_legacy.c
>> +++ b/common/spl/spl_legacy.c
>> @@ -18,9 +18,13 @@
>>
>> static void spl_parse_legacy_validate(uintptr_t start, uintptr_t size)
>> {
>> + uintptr_t end = start + size;
>> uintptr_t spl_start = (uintptr_t)_start;
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM
>> uintptr_t spl_end = (uintptr_t)_image_binary_end;
>> - uintptr_t end = start + size;
>> +#else
>> + uintptr_t spl_end = (uintptr_t)&_image_binary_end;
>
>I _think_ only this extra & should be enough and that should also work
>on ARM, right ?
>
>[...]
Hi! Thanks for your review. For ARM target, My understanding is that
'&_image_binary_end' is a random value. '&_image_binary_end' is a
pointer which points to the spl image end address. I think it's not
okay for ARM target.
I do not have any relevant ARM devices, so I can't test it.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] spl: spl_legacy: Fix spl_end address for non ARM target
2023-07-31 16:10 ` Shiji Yang
@ 2023-07-31 19:12 ` Tom Rini
2023-08-01 2:35 ` Shiji Yang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Tom Rini @ 2023-07-31 19:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Shiji Yang; +Cc: marex, festevam, michael, okamura.dai, rogerq, sjg, u-boot
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2031 bytes --]
On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 12:10:52AM +0800, Shiji Yang wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Jul 2023 16:17:39 +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >On 7/31/23 13:57, Shiji Yang wrote:
> >> Only ARM target defines _image_binary_end symbol as char*, All other
> >> targets define it as an ulong type in include/asm-generic/sections.h.
> >>
> >> This patch fixes the boot failure on MIPS target. Error log:
> >> SPL: Image overlaps SPL
> >>
> >> Fixes: 1b8a1be1a1f1 ("spl: spl_legacy: Fix spl_end address")
> >> Signed-off-by: Shiji Yang <yangshiji66@outlook.com>
> >> ---
> >> common/spl/spl_legacy.c | 6 +++++-
> >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/common/spl/spl_legacy.c b/common/spl/spl_legacy.c
> >> index 095443c63d..0fef890384 100644
> >> --- a/common/spl/spl_legacy.c
> >> +++ b/common/spl/spl_legacy.c
> >> @@ -18,9 +18,13 @@
> >>
> >> static void spl_parse_legacy_validate(uintptr_t start, uintptr_t size)
> >> {
> >> + uintptr_t end = start + size;
> >> uintptr_t spl_start = (uintptr_t)_start;
> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM
> >> uintptr_t spl_end = (uintptr_t)_image_binary_end;
> >> - uintptr_t end = start + size;
> >> +#else
> >> + uintptr_t spl_end = (uintptr_t)&_image_binary_end;
> >
> >I _think_ only this extra & should be enough and that should also work
> >on ARM, right ?
> >
> >[...]
>
> Hi! Thanks for your review. For ARM target, My understanding is that
> '&_image_binary_end' is a random value. '&_image_binary_end' is a
> pointer which points to the spl image end address. I think it's not
> okay for ARM target.
>
> I do not have any relevant ARM devices, so I can't test it.
OK, but why isn't the answer that _image_binary_end should be char for
everyone, and that it was simply mis-placed in the header to start with
(which is why it was then later added to the header for non-ARM)? Given
how everyone not-ARM treats it exactly like ARM does in linker scripts,
that seems the most likely case.
--
Tom
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 659 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] spl: spl_legacy: Fix spl_end address for non ARM target
2023-07-31 19:12 ` Tom Rini
@ 2023-08-01 2:35 ` Shiji Yang
2023-08-01 2:37 ` Tom Rini
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Shiji Yang @ 2023-08-01 2:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: trini; +Cc: festevam, marex, michael, okamura.dai, rogerq, sjg, u-boot
On Mon, 31 Jul 2023 15:12:27 -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 12:10:52AM +0800, Shiji Yang wrote:
> > On Mon, 31 Jul 2023 16:17:39 +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > >On 7/31/23 13:57, Shiji Yang wrote:
> > >> Only ARM target defines _image_binary_end symbol as char*, All other
> > >> targets define it as an ulong type in include/asm-generic/sections.h.
> > >>
> > >> This patch fixes the boot failure on MIPS target. Error log:
> > >> SPL: Image overlaps SPL
> > >>
> > >> Fixes: 1b8a1be1a1f1 ("spl: spl_legacy: Fix spl_end address")
> > >> Signed-off-by: Shiji Yang <yangshiji66@outlook.com>
> > >> ---
> > >> common/spl/spl_legacy.c | 6 +++++-
> > >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >>
> > >> diff --git a/common/spl/spl_legacy.c b/common/spl/spl_legacy.c
> > >> index 095443c63d..0fef890384 100644
> > >> --- a/common/spl/spl_legacy.c
> > >> +++ b/common/spl/spl_legacy.c
> > >> @@ -18,9 +18,13 @@
> > >>
> > >> static void spl_parse_legacy_validate(uintptr_t start, uintptr_t size)
> > >> {
> > >> + uintptr_t end = start + size;
> > >> uintptr_t spl_start = (uintptr_t)_start;
> > >> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM
> > >> uintptr_t spl_end = (uintptr_t)_image_binary_end;
> > >> - uintptr_t end = start + size;
> > >> +#else
> > >> + uintptr_t spl_end = (uintptr_t)&_image_binary_end;
> > >
> > >I _think_ only this extra & should be enough and that should also work
> > >on ARM, right ?
> > >
> > >[...]
> >
> > Hi! Thanks for your review. For ARM target, My understanding is that
> > '&_image_binary_end' is a random value. '&_image_binary_end' is a
> > pointer which points to the spl image end address. I think it's not
> > okay for ARM target.
> >
> > I do not have any relevant ARM devices, so I can't test it.
>
> OK, but why isn't the answer that _image_binary_end should be char for
> everyone, and that it was simply mis-placed in the header to start with
> (which is why it was then later added to the header for non-ARM)? Given
> how everyone not-ARM treats it exactly like ARM does in linker scripts,
> that seems the most likely case.
>
> --
> Tom
Importing variables from linker scripts is a littile magic to me.
Based on my test, yes you are right. I can make MIPS target work
again by converting '_image_binary_end' from ulong to char[] type.
I'll try to cook some patches to convert all symbols in 'sections.h'
to char[]. I believe this is the right way to fix some potential
issues.
If you want to do this work, please let me know. I am a newbie for
u-boot. It seems that you are more familiar with the u-boot framework.
Regards
Shiji Yang
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] spl: spl_legacy: Fix spl_end address for non ARM target
2023-08-01 2:35 ` Shiji Yang
@ 2023-08-01 2:37 ` Tom Rini
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Tom Rini @ 2023-08-01 2:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Shiji Yang; +Cc: festevam, marex, michael, okamura.dai, rogerq, sjg, u-boot
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3126 bytes --]
On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 10:35:19AM +0800, Shiji Yang wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Jul 2023 15:12:27 -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 12:10:52AM +0800, Shiji Yang wrote:
> > > On Mon, 31 Jul 2023 16:17:39 +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > >On 7/31/23 13:57, Shiji Yang wrote:
> > > >> Only ARM target defines _image_binary_end symbol as char*, All other
> > > >> targets define it as an ulong type in include/asm-generic/sections.h.
> > > >>
> > > >> This patch fixes the boot failure on MIPS target. Error log:
> > > >> SPL: Image overlaps SPL
> > > >>
> > > >> Fixes: 1b8a1be1a1f1 ("spl: spl_legacy: Fix spl_end address")
> > > >> Signed-off-by: Shiji Yang <yangshiji66@outlook.com>
> > > >> ---
> > > >> common/spl/spl_legacy.c | 6 +++++-
> > > >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > >>
> > > >> diff --git a/common/spl/spl_legacy.c b/common/spl/spl_legacy.c
> > > >> index 095443c63d..0fef890384 100644
> > > >> --- a/common/spl/spl_legacy.c
> > > >> +++ b/common/spl/spl_legacy.c
> > > >> @@ -18,9 +18,13 @@
> > > >>
> > > >> static void spl_parse_legacy_validate(uintptr_t start, uintptr_t size)
> > > >> {
> > > >> + uintptr_t end = start + size;
> > > >> uintptr_t spl_start = (uintptr_t)_start;
> > > >> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM
> > > >> uintptr_t spl_end = (uintptr_t)_image_binary_end;
> > > >> - uintptr_t end = start + size;
> > > >> +#else
> > > >> + uintptr_t spl_end = (uintptr_t)&_image_binary_end;
> > > >
> > > >I _think_ only this extra & should be enough and that should also work
> > > >on ARM, right ?
> > > >
> > > >[...]
> > >
> > > Hi! Thanks for your review. For ARM target, My understanding is that
> > > '&_image_binary_end' is a random value. '&_image_binary_end' is a
> > > pointer which points to the spl image end address. I think it's not
> > > okay for ARM target.
> > >
> > > I do not have any relevant ARM devices, so I can't test it.
> >
> > OK, but why isn't the answer that _image_binary_end should be char for
> > everyone, and that it was simply mis-placed in the header to start with
> > (which is why it was then later added to the header for non-ARM)? Given
> > how everyone not-ARM treats it exactly like ARM does in linker scripts,
> > that seems the most likely case.
> >
> > --
> > Tom
>
> Importing variables from linker scripts is a littile magic to me.
> Based on my test, yes you are right. I can make MIPS target work
> again by converting '_image_binary_end' from ulong to char[] type.
> I'll try to cook some patches to convert all symbols in 'sections.h'
> to char[]. I believe this is the right way to fix some potential
> issues.
>
> If you want to do this work, please let me know. I am a newbie for
> u-boot. It seems that you are more familiar with the u-boot framework.
The only symbol I see for sure that needs to be changed is
'_image_binary_end' so if you'd like to have a go at converting that and
making a patch and running CI:
https://u-boot.readthedocs.io/en/latest/develop/ci_testing.html
I'd appreciate it, thanks!
--
Tom
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 659 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-08-01 2:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-07-31 11:57 [PATCH] spl: spl_legacy: Fix spl_end address for non ARM target Shiji Yang
2023-07-31 14:17 ` Marek Vasut
2023-07-31 16:10 ` Shiji Yang
2023-07-31 19:12 ` Tom Rini
2023-08-01 2:35 ` Shiji Yang
2023-08-01 2:37 ` Tom Rini
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-07-31 6:19 Shiji Yang
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox