From: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
To: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Cc: U-Boot Mailing List <u-boot@lists.denx.de>,
Alexey Brodkin <Alexey.Brodkin@synopsys.com>,
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>,
Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@cherry.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] buildman: Support building within a Python venv
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 17:30:26 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240620233026.GU68077@bill-the-cat> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFLszTj0QgctNFigd=m7450gCLU3mnu9bTXtk=DuZmE7eAtWBg@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2552 bytes --]
On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 05:05:30PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 at 08:32, Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 07:19:35AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> >
> > > The Python virtualenv tool sets up a few things in the envronment,
> > > putting its path first in the PATH environment variable and setting up
> > > a sys.prefix different from the sys.base_prefix value.
> > >
> > > At present buildman puts the toolchain path first in PATH so that it can
> > > be found easily during the build. For sandbox this causes problems since
> > > /usr/bin/gcc (for example) results in '/usr/bin' being prepended to the
> > > PATH variable. As a result, the venv is partially disabled.
> > >
> > > The result is that sandbox builds within a venv ignore the venv, e.g.
> > > when looking for packages.
> > >
> > > Correct this by detecting the venv and adding the toolchain path after
> > > the venv path.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
> >
> > Why are we using PATH at all in this case? Shouldn't we just be setting
> > CROSS_COMPILE=/full/path/to/the/prefix ?
>
> This is the -p option to buildman. The original commit was:
>
> commit bb1501f2c22c979961b735db775605cccedd98f6
> Author: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
> Date: Mon Dec 1 17:34:00 2014 -0700
>
> buildman: Add an option to use the full tool chain path
>
> In some cases there may be multiple toolchains with the same name in the
> path. Provide an option to use the full path in the CROSS_COMPILE
> environment variable.
>
> Note: Wolfgang mentioned that this is dangerous since in some cases there
> may be other tools on the path that are needed. So this is set up as an
> option, not the default. I will need test confirmation (i.e. that this
> commit fixes a real problem) before merging it.
>
> As to why we don't always do this, well that is back in the mists of
> time, 10 years ago.
>
> BTW, this is raising a point ("let's change the behaviour") separate
> from the goal of this commit, which is to fix a problem with venv,
> albeit that if we made -p the only option, then we could potentially
> drop all PATH changes. Perhaps toolchains are built differently now,
> such that they always invoke their tools using the same prefix and
> dir?
Wait, I'm confused. buildman internally updates its own PATH to avoid
calling CROSS_COMPILE with the full path due to a concern about
toolchain bugs?
--
Tom
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 659 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-20 23:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-20 13:19 [PATCH 0/5] Add Binman code-coverage test to CI Simon Glass
2024-06-20 13:19 ` [PATCH 1/5] Dockerfile: Add python3-coverage Simon Glass
2024-06-20 14:30 ` Tom Rini
2024-06-20 13:19 ` [PATCH 2/5] Dockerfile: Add python3-pycryptodome Simon Glass
2024-06-20 13:19 ` [PATCH 3/5] buildman: Support building within a Python venv Simon Glass
2024-06-20 13:38 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2024-06-20 23:05 ` Simon Glass
2024-06-20 14:32 ` Tom Rini
2024-06-20 23:05 ` Simon Glass
2024-06-20 23:30 ` Tom Rini [this message]
2024-06-21 14:57 ` Simon Glass
2024-06-21 15:22 ` Tom Rini
2024-06-21 18:19 ` Simon Glass
2024-06-21 19:26 ` Tom Rini
2024-06-21 19:39 ` Simon Glass
2024-06-21 20:48 ` Tom Rini
2024-06-20 13:19 ` [PATCH 4/5] u_boot_pylib: Use correct coverage tool within venv Simon Glass
2024-06-20 13:19 ` [PATCH 5/5] CI: Run code-coverage test for Binman Simon Glass
2024-06-20 14:34 ` Tom Rini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240620233026.GU68077@bill-the-cat \
--to=trini@konsulko.com \
--cc=Alexey.Brodkin@synopsys.com \
--cc=quentin.schulz@cherry.de \
--cc=sjg@chromium.org \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
--cc=xypron.glpk@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox