U-Boot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
To: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Cc: U-Boot Mailing List <u-boot@lists.denx.de>,
	Alexey Brodkin <Alexey.Brodkin@synopsys.com>,
	Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>,
	Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@cherry.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] buildman: Support building within a Python venv
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 09:22:29 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240621152229.GV68077@bill-the-cat> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFLszTi7qXX6R5=LQqCMveH7aJ=N96Mcob+gp11MEPixgrK66A@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3990 bytes --]

On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 08:57:50AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Tom,
> 
> On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 at 17:30, Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 05:05:30PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > Hi Tom,
> > >
> > > On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 at 08:32, Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 07:19:35AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > The Python virtualenv tool sets up a few things in the envronment,
> > > > > putting its path first in the PATH environment variable and setting up
> > > > > a sys.prefix different from the sys.base_prefix value.
> > > > >
> > > > > At present buildman puts the toolchain path first in PATH so that it can
> > > > > be found easily during the build. For sandbox this causes problems since
> > > > > /usr/bin/gcc (for example) results in '/usr/bin' being prepended to the
> > > > > PATH variable. As a result, the venv is partially disabled.
> > > > >
> > > > > The result is that sandbox builds within a venv ignore the venv, e.g.
> > > > > when looking for packages.
> > > > >
> > > > > Correct this by detecting the venv and adding the toolchain path after
> > > > > the venv path.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
> > > >
> > > > Why are we using PATH at all in this case? Shouldn't we just be setting
> > > > CROSS_COMPILE=/full/path/to/the/prefix ?
> > >
> > > This is the -p option to buildman. The original commit was:
> > >
> > > commit bb1501f2c22c979961b735db775605cccedd98f6
> > > Author: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
> > > Date:   Mon Dec 1 17:34:00 2014 -0700
> > >
> > >     buildman: Add an option to use the full tool chain path
> > >
> > >     In some cases there may be multiple toolchains with the same name in the
> > >     path. Provide an option to use the full path in the CROSS_COMPILE
> > >     environment variable.
> > >
> > >     Note: Wolfgang mentioned that this is dangerous since in some cases there
> > >     may be other tools on the path that are needed. So this is set up as an
> > >     option, not the default. I will need test confirmation (i.e. that this
> > >     commit fixes a real problem) before merging it.
> > >
> > > As to why we don't always do this, well that is back in the mists of
> > > time, 10 years ago.
> > >
> > > BTW, this is raising a point ("let's change the behaviour") separate
> > > from the goal of this commit, which is to fix a problem with venv,
> > > albeit that if we made -p the only option, then we could potentially
> > > drop all PATH changes. Perhaps toolchains are built differently now,
> > > such that they always invoke their tools using the same prefix and
> > > dir?
> >
> > Wait, I'm confused. buildman internally updates its own PATH to avoid
> > calling CROSS_COMPILE with the full path due to a concern about
> > toolchain bugs?
> 
> Not its own PATH: the one it passes to U-Boot's 'make'.

OK, but the point stands.

> I'm not sure why, actually. It is such a long time ago that I don't remember.
> 
> I see:
> 
> ~/.buildman-toolchains/gcc-13.2.0-nolibc/arm-linux-gnueabi/bin/arm-linux-gnueabi-ld

Yes, prefixed version that's allowed to be called by users.

> and
> 
> ~/.buildman-toolchains/gcc-13.2.0-nolibc/arm-linux-gnueabi/arm-linux-gnueabi/bin/ld

Internal usage, here be dragons and all that.

> but interestingly there is no gcc in the latter directory, which there
> was in 4.6 (and presumably for some time after).
> 
> Certainly for sandbox there is no prefix, so we cannot add it in that
> case, and sandbox is actually the arch used to run these tests.

CROSS_COMPILE is empty for sandbox, yes.

> What are you suggesting we change about this patch?

That it's going about things backwards? If you're setting CROSS_COMPILE
_then_ it should be the full path that it already knows otherwise if not
setting CROSS_COMPILE then also not modifying PATH.

-- 
Tom

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 659 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2024-06-21 15:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-20 13:19 [PATCH 0/5] Add Binman code-coverage test to CI Simon Glass
2024-06-20 13:19 ` [PATCH 1/5] Dockerfile: Add python3-coverage Simon Glass
2024-06-20 14:30   ` Tom Rini
2024-06-20 13:19 ` [PATCH 2/5] Dockerfile: Add python3-pycryptodome Simon Glass
2024-06-20 13:19 ` [PATCH 3/5] buildman: Support building within a Python venv Simon Glass
2024-06-20 13:38   ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2024-06-20 23:05     ` Simon Glass
2024-06-20 14:32   ` Tom Rini
2024-06-20 23:05     ` Simon Glass
2024-06-20 23:30       ` Tom Rini
2024-06-21 14:57         ` Simon Glass
2024-06-21 15:22           ` Tom Rini [this message]
2024-06-21 18:19             ` Simon Glass
2024-06-21 19:26               ` Tom Rini
2024-06-21 19:39                 ` Simon Glass
2024-06-21 20:48                   ` Tom Rini
2024-06-20 13:19 ` [PATCH 4/5] u_boot_pylib: Use correct coverage tool within venv Simon Glass
2024-06-20 13:19 ` [PATCH 5/5] CI: Run code-coverage test for Binman Simon Glass
2024-06-20 14:34   ` Tom Rini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240621152229.GV68077@bill-the-cat \
    --to=trini@konsulko.com \
    --cc=Alexey.Brodkin@synopsys.com \
    --cc=quentin.schulz@cherry.de \
    --cc=sjg@chromium.org \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    --cc=xypron.glpk@gmx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox