[U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/6] rockchip: back-to-bootrom: replace assembly-implementation with C-code

[Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>]

Am Donnerstag, 21. September 2017, 10:19:23 CEST schrieb Philipp Tomsich:
> 
> Recent discussions confirmed (what the code always assumed): the
> Rockchip BROM always enters U-Boot with the stack-pointer valid
> (i.e. the U-Boot startup code is running off the BROM stack).
> 
> We can thus replace the back-to-bootrom code (i.e. both the
> save_boot_params and back_to_bootrom implementations) using C-code
> based on setjmp/longjmp.  The new implementation is already structured
> to allow an easy drop-in of Andy's changes to enter download-mode when
> returning to the BROM.
> 
> This turned out to require a some tweaking to system.h (making sure
> that the prototype for save_boot_params_ret is visible for A64)and
> start.S (so binutils knows that this is a possible function entry and
> it can correctly insert A32-to-Thumb transitions) and taking the axe
> to setjmp.h (which created quite a few issues with it not expecting
> A32/T32/Thumb call-sites and some fragility from GCC being smart about
> the clobber-list of the inline assembly... which led to r9 not being
> saved or restored).

This is missing information on dependant series. Using the u-boot-rockchip
repository which is at
782088de7be7 ("rockchip: imply ADC and SARADC_ROCKCHIP on supported SoCs")

patches 1-3 apply, but patch 4 fails to apply as I seem to be missing some
dependencies.

And the u-boot mailinglist seems to be configured very strangely, as it
seems to rip apart patch-series only sending me some parts.

So far I can at least say, that the u-boot-rockchip repo at the above
commit still boots. Could you please point me to mbox versions
of needed base patches?


Thanks
Heiko