* [U-Boot] WinCE image load/boot cmd support
@ 2011-02-10 10:13 Andy Pont
2011-02-10 10:19 ` Graeme Russ
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andy Pont @ 2011-02-10 10:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Hello!
Does anyone know what happened to the patches for loading and booting
Windows CE image suggested here:
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2008-August/039202.html
Did they get included and have subsequently been removed from U-Boot or did
they never make it into the mainline code?
Thanks and regards,
Andy.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] WinCE image load/boot cmd support
2011-02-10 10:13 [U-Boot] WinCE image load/boot cmd support Andy Pont
@ 2011-02-10 10:19 ` Graeme Russ
2011-02-10 14:26 ` Andy Pont
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Graeme Russ @ 2011-02-10 10:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On 10/02/11 21:13, Andy Pont wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Does anyone know what happened to the patches for loading and booting
> Windows CE image suggested here:
>
> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2008-August/039202.html
>
> Did they get included and have subsequently been removed from U-Boot or did
> they never make it into the mainline code?
>
I doubt it. The fact that it used the GPL incompatible BSD license (the one
with 'obnoxious advertising' clause) probably didn't help ;)
Regards,
Graeme
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] WinCE image load/boot cmd support
2011-02-10 10:19 ` Graeme Russ
@ 2011-02-10 14:26 ` Andy Pont
2011-02-10 14:44 ` Michael Trimarchi
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andy Pont @ 2011-02-10 14:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Graeme wrote...
> > Did they get included and have subsequently been removed from U-Boot or
did
> > they never make it into the mainline code?
> >
>
> I doubt it. The fact that it used the GPL incompatible BSD license (the
one
> with 'obnoxious advertising' clause) probably didn't help ;)
If they were rewritten to fit in with the ethos and licensing of U-Boot is
it something that would be a worthwhile addition?
Andy.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] WinCE image load/boot cmd support
2011-02-10 14:26 ` Andy Pont
@ 2011-02-10 14:44 ` Michael Trimarchi
2011-02-10 16:24 ` Andy Pont
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Michael Trimarchi @ 2011-02-10 14:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Hi,
On 02/10/2011 03:26 PM, Andy Pont wrote:
> Graeme wrote...
>
>>> Did they get included and have subsequently been removed from U-Boot or
> did
>>> they never make it into the mainline code?
>>>
>>
>> I doubt it. The fact that it used the GPL incompatible BSD license (the
> one
>> with 'obnoxious advertising' clause) probably didn't help ;)
>
> If they were rewritten to fit in with the ethos and licensing of U-Boot is
> it something that would be a worthwhile addition?
>
I have rewritten them, but they are lack of same part. Physical, Virtual mapping
and parameter passing
Michael
> Andy.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> U-Boot mailing list
> U-Boot at lists.denx.de
> http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] WinCE image load/boot cmd support
2011-02-10 14:44 ` Michael Trimarchi
@ 2011-02-10 16:24 ` Andy Pont
2011-02-10 17:52 ` Michael Trimarchi
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andy Pont @ 2011-02-10 16:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Michael wrote...
> > If they were rewritten to fit in with the ethos and licensing of U- Boot
is
> > it something that would be a worthwhile addition?
>
> I have rewritten them, but they are lack of same part. Physical, Virtual
mapping
> and parameter passing
Are you prepared to share them and I will see if I can figure out how to add
the support that is missing.
Thanks and regards,
Andy.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] WinCE image load/boot cmd support
2011-02-10 16:24 ` Andy Pont
@ 2011-02-10 17:52 ` Michael Trimarchi
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Michael Trimarchi @ 2011-02-10 17:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
hi
On 02/10/2011 05:24 PM, Andy Pont wrote:
> Michael wrote...
>
>>> If they were rewritten to fit in with the ethos and licensing of U- Boot
> is
>>> it something that would be a worthwhile addition?
>>
>> I have rewritten them, but they are lack of same part. Physical, Virtual
> mapping
>> and parameter passing
>
I'm working for a company for winCe device, and I'm taking care of uboot part of it.
I will send the patches after the end of mobile congress,
> Are you prepared to share them and I will see if I can figure out how to add
> the support that is missing.
Yes I will share. Let me finish, and clean-up them ;)
>
> Thanks and regards,
>
> Andy.
Michael
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-02-10 17:52 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-02-10 10:13 [U-Boot] WinCE image load/boot cmd support Andy Pont
2011-02-10 10:19 ` Graeme Russ
2011-02-10 14:26 ` Andy Pont
2011-02-10 14:44 ` Michael Trimarchi
2011-02-10 16:24 ` Andy Pont
2011-02-10 17:52 ` Michael Trimarchi
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox