U-Boot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [PATCH V2] mkimage: fit: Do not tail-pad fitImage with external data
Date: Wed, 06 May 2020 12:15:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <501a2ab121fa2e21663e6979627b0ee3@walle.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1073087038ce37a09715bcb5054c7931@walle.cc>

Am 2020-05-05 23:17, schrieb Michael Walle:
> Hi all,
> 
> Am 2020-05-05 20:41, schrieb Simon Glass:
>> Hi Tom,
>> 
>> On Tue, 5 May 2020 at 11:50, Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 06:39:58PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> > On 5/5/20 6:37 PM, Alex Kiernan wrote:
>>> > > On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 2:28 PM Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> wrote:
>>> > >>
>>> > >> On 5/5/20 3:22 PM, Alex Kiernan wrote:
>>> > >>> On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 12:28 PM Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> wrote:
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>> On Fri, May 01, 2020 at 05:40:25PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>>> There is no reason to tail-pad fitImage with external data to 4-bytes,
>>> > >>>>> while fitImage without external data does not have any such padding and
>>> > >>>>> is often unaligned. DT spec also does not mandate any such padding.
>>> > >>>>>
>>> > >>>>> Moreover, the tail-pad fills the last few bytes with uninitialized data,
>>> > >>>>> which could lead to a potential information leak.
>>> > >>>>>
>>> > >>>>> $ echo -n xy > /tmp/data ; \
>>> > >>>>>       ./tools/mkimage -E -f auto -d /tmp/data /tmp/fitImage ; \
>>> > >>>>>       hexdump -vC /tmp/fitImage | tail -n 3
>>> > >>>>>
>>> > >>>>> before:
>>> > >>>>> 00000260  61 2d 6f 66 66 73 65 74  00 64 61 74 61 2d 73 69  |a-offset.data-si|
>>> > >>>>> 00000270  7a 65 00 00 78 79 64 64                           |ze..xydd|
>>> > >>>>>                    ^^       ^^ ^^
>>> > >>>>> after:
>>> > >>>>> 00000260  61 2d 6f 66 66 73 65 74  00 64 61 74 61 2d 73 69  |a-offset.data-si|
>>> > >>>>> 00000270  7a 65 00 78 79                                    |ze.xy|
>>> > >>>>>
>>> > >>>>> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
>>> > >>>>> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
>>> > >>>>> Cc: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
>>> > >>>>> Cc: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>> Applied to u-boot/master, thanks!
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> This breaks booting on my board (am3352, eMMC boot, FIT u-boot,
>>> > >>> CONFIG_SPL_LOAD_FIT). Not got any useful diagnostics - if I boot it
>>> > >>> from eMMC I get nothing at all on the console, if I boot over ymodem
>>> > >>> it stalls at 420k, before continuing to 460k. My guess is there's some
>>> > >>> error going to the console at the 420k mark, but obviously it's lost
>>> > >>> in the ymodem... I have two DTBs in the FIT image, 420k would about
>>> > >>> align to the point between them.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> My bet would be on some padding / unaligned access problem that this
>>> > >> patch uncovered. Can you take a look ?
>>> > >
>>> > > Seems plausible. With this change my external data starts at 0x483 and
>>> > > everything after it is non-aligned:
>>> >
>>> > Should the beginning of external data be aligned ?
>>> 
>>> If in U-Boot we revert e8c2d25845c72c7202a628a97d45e31beea40668 does 
>>> the
>>> problem go away?  If so, that's not a fix outright, it means we need 
>>> to
>>> dig back in to the libfdt thread and find the "make this work without
>>> killing performance everywhere all the time" option.
>> 
>> If it is a device tree, it must be 32-bit aligned.
> 
> This commit actually breaks my board too (which I was just about to 
> send
> upstream, but realized it was broken).
> 
> Said board uses SPL and main U-Boot. SPL runs fine and main u-boot 
> doesn't
> output anything. The only difference which I found is that fit-dtb.blob 
> is
> 2 bytes shorter. And the content is shifted by one byte although
> data-offset is the same. Strange. In the non-working case, the inner
> FDT magic isn't 4 byte aligned.

Here are the steps to reproduce it on the uboot master branch:

$ CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux-gnueabihf- make pico-imx6_defconfig 
fit-dtb.blob tools
$ tools/dumpimage -T flat_dt -p 1 -o fdt-1 fit-dtb.blob
$ file fdt-1
fdt-1: data
$ git revert 20a154f95bfe0a3b5bfba90bea7f001c58217536
$ git clean -fdx
$ CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux-gnueabihf- make pico-imx6_defconfig 
fit-dtb.blob tools
$ tools/dumpimage -T flat_dt -p 1 -o fdt-1 fit-dtb.blob
$ file fdt-1
fdt-1: Device Tree Blob version 17, size=34978, boot CPU=0, string block 
size=1746, DT structure block size=33176

-michael

  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-06 10:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-01 15:40 [PATCH V2] mkimage: fit: Do not tail-pad fitImage with external data Marek Vasut
2020-05-03  2:26 ` Simon Glass
2020-05-04 11:27 ` Tom Rini
2020-05-05 13:22   ` Alex Kiernan
2020-05-05 13:28     ` Marek Vasut
2020-05-05 16:37       ` Alex Kiernan
2020-05-05 16:39         ` Marek Vasut
2020-05-05 17:50           ` Tom Rini
2020-05-05 17:53             ` Marek Vasut
2020-05-05 17:55               ` Tom Rini
2020-05-05 17:59                 ` Marek Vasut
2020-05-05 18:06                   ` Tom Rini
2020-05-05 18:18                     ` Marek Vasut
2020-05-05 18:41             ` Simon Glass
2020-05-05 21:17               ` Michael Walle
2020-05-06 10:15                 ` Michael Walle [this message]
2020-05-06 12:30                 ` Alex Kiernan
2020-05-06 13:48                 ` Tom Rini
2020-05-06 14:17                   ` Marek Vasut
2020-05-06 14:27                     ` Tom Rini
2020-05-06 14:33                       ` Marek Vasut
2020-05-06 14:37                         ` Tom Rini
2020-05-06 14:41                           ` Marek Vasut
2020-05-06 15:43                             ` Alex Kiernan
2020-05-06 15:52                               ` Marek Vasut
2020-05-06 16:04                                 ` Tom Rini
2020-05-06 16:17                                   ` Marek Vasut
2020-05-06 16:33                                     ` Tom Rini
2020-05-06 16:35                                       ` Marek Vasut
2020-05-06 17:02                                         ` Tom Rini
2020-05-06 18:11                                           ` Marek Vasut
2020-05-07 20:46                                           ` Samuel Holland
2020-05-08  1:37                                             ` Marek Vasut
2020-05-08 18:47                                               ` Tom Rini
2020-05-08 19:00                                                 ` Marek Vasut
2020-05-08 19:21                                                   ` Tom Rini
2020-05-10 19:24                                                     ` Marek Vasut
2020-05-11 19:36                                                       ` Tom Rini
2020-05-26 15:53                                                         ` Marek Vasut
2020-05-06 12:43               ` Alex Kiernan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=501a2ab121fa2e21663e6979627b0ee3@walle.cc \
    --to=michael@walle.cc \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox