* [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] OMAP4: Add ID for OMAP4470_ES1_0 @ 2013-04-04 15:57 Lubomir Popov 2013-04-04 16:00 ` Nishanth Menon 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Lubomir Popov @ 2013-04-04 15:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot V2 fixes garbled subject. Signed-off-by: Lubomir Popov <lpopov@mm-sol.com> --- arch/arm/include/asm/omap_common.h | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/omap_common.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/omap_common.h index 091ddb5..f042c10 100644 --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/omap_common.h +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/omap_common.h @@ -573,6 +573,7 @@ static inline u32 omap_revision(void) #define OMAP4430_ES2_3 0x44300230 #define OMAP4460_ES1_0 0x44600100 #define OMAP4460_ES1_1 0x44600110 +#define OMAP4470_ES1_0 0x44700100 /* omap5 */ #define OMAP5430_SILICON_ID_INVALID 0 -- 1.7.9.5 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] OMAP4: Add ID for OMAP4470_ES1_0 2013-04-04 15:57 [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] OMAP4: Add ID for OMAP4470_ES1_0 Lubomir Popov @ 2013-04-04 16:00 ` Nishanth Menon 2013-04-04 16:14 ` Lubomir Popov 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Nishanth Menon @ 2013-04-04 16:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot On 18:57-20130404, Lubomir Popov wrote: > V2 fixes garbled subject. move this to diffstat section - here and in the rest of the patches. > > Signed-off-by: Lubomir Popov <lpopov@mm-sol.com> > > --- > arch/arm/include/asm/omap_common.h | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/omap_common.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/omap_common.h > index 091ddb5..f042c10 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/omap_common.h > +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/omap_common.h > @@ -573,6 +573,7 @@ static inline u32 omap_revision(void) > #define OMAP4430_ES2_3 0x44300230 > #define OMAP4460_ES1_0 0x44600100 > #define OMAP4460_ES1_1 0x44600110 > +#define OMAP4470_ES1_0 0x44700100 and used where? we do not support 4470 in u-boot today, and to my knowledge, there is no plans to do it either. > > /* omap5 */ > #define OMAP5430_SILICON_ID_INVALID 0 > -- > 1.7.9.5 > _______________________________________________ > U-Boot mailing list > U-Boot at lists.denx.de > http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot -- Regards, Nishanth Menon ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] OMAP4: Add ID for OMAP4470_ES1_0 2013-04-04 16:00 ` Nishanth Menon @ 2013-04-04 16:14 ` Lubomir Popov 2013-04-04 16:44 ` Nishanth Menon 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Lubomir Popov @ 2013-04-04 16:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot Hello, On 04/04/13 19:00, Nishanth Menon wrote: > On 18:57-20130404, Lubomir Popov wrote: >> V2 fixes garbled subject. > move this to diffstat section - here and in the rest of the patches. >> >> Signed-off-by: Lubomir Popov <lpopov@mm-sol.com> >> >> --- >> arch/arm/include/asm/omap_common.h | 1 + >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/omap_common.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/omap_common.h >> index 091ddb5..f042c10 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/omap_common.h >> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/omap_common.h >> @@ -573,6 +573,7 @@ static inline u32 omap_revision(void) >> #define OMAP4430_ES2_3 0x44300230 >> #define OMAP4460_ES1_0 0x44600100 >> #define OMAP4460_ES1_1 0x44600110 >> +#define OMAP4470_ES1_0 0x44700100 > and used where? we do not support 4470 in u-boot today, and to my > knowledge, there is no plans to do it either. Used on a custom MMS board that I'm working upon; it is up and running U-Boot with a TI 750-2173 processor card, including USB EHCI (including HSIC devices). Please see patch 233501 on my (very initial) 4470/6032 support. If interested, I can post the board files as well. >> >> /* omap5 */ >> #define OMAP5430_SILICON_ID_INVALID 0 >> -- >> 1.7.9.5 >> _______________________________________________ >> U-Boot mailing list >> U-Boot at lists.denx.de >> http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot > Regards, Lubomir ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] OMAP4: Add ID for OMAP4470_ES1_0 2013-04-04 16:14 ` Lubomir Popov @ 2013-04-04 16:44 ` Nishanth Menon 2013-04-04 16:54 ` Tom Rini 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Nishanth Menon @ 2013-04-04 16:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot On 19:14-20130404, Lubomir Popov wrote: > Hello, > > On 04/04/13 19:00, Nishanth Menon wrote: > > On 18:57-20130404, Lubomir Popov wrote: > >> V2 fixes garbled subject. > > move this to diffstat section - here and in the rest of the patches. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Lubomir Popov <lpopov@mm-sol.com> > >> > >> --- > >> arch/arm/include/asm/omap_common.h | 1 + > >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > >> > >> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/omap_common.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/omap_common.h > >> index 091ddb5..f042c10 100644 > >> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/omap_common.h > >> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/omap_common.h > >> @@ -573,6 +573,7 @@ static inline u32 omap_revision(void) > >> #define OMAP4430_ES2_3 0x44300230 > >> #define OMAP4460_ES1_0 0x44600100 > >> #define OMAP4460_ES1_1 0x44600110 > >> +#define OMAP4470_ES1_0 0x44700100 > > and used where? we do not support 4470 in u-boot today, and to my > > knowledge, there is no plans to do it either. > > Used on a custom MMS board that I'm working upon; it is up and running U-Boot > with a TI 750-2173 processor card, including USB EHCI (including HSIC devices). > Please see patch 233501 on my (very initial) 4470/6032 support. > > If interested, I can post the board files as well. there is no u-boot support for 4470 $ git branch -v * master c814263 Prepare v2013.04-rc2 $ git grep 4470 .|grep OMAP $ What is the point in having board files for an SoC that is not supported in upstream?? My suggestion is that you either provide and maintain support for the SoC upstream (considering that inside TI, there seems be to no known motivation to do so) and introduce your board file, OR maintain this patch in the u-boot fork for the vendor board. -- Regards, Nishanth Menon ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] OMAP4: Add ID for OMAP4470_ES1_0 2013-04-04 16:44 ` Nishanth Menon @ 2013-04-04 16:54 ` Tom Rini 2013-04-04 17:58 ` Nishanth Menon 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Tom Rini @ 2013-04-04 16:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 11:44:14AM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote: > On 19:14-20130404, Lubomir Popov wrote: > > Hello, > > > > On 04/04/13 19:00, Nishanth Menon wrote: > > > On 18:57-20130404, Lubomir Popov wrote: > > >> V2 fixes garbled subject. > > > move this to diffstat section - here and in the rest of the patches. > > >> > > >> Signed-off-by: Lubomir Popov <lpopov@mm-sol.com> > > >> > > >> --- > > >> arch/arm/include/asm/omap_common.h | 1 + > > >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > >> > > >> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/omap_common.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/omap_common.h > > >> index 091ddb5..f042c10 100644 > > >> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/omap_common.h > > >> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/omap_common.h > > >> @@ -573,6 +573,7 @@ static inline u32 omap_revision(void) > > >> #define OMAP4430_ES2_3 0x44300230 > > >> #define OMAP4460_ES1_0 0x44600100 > > >> #define OMAP4460_ES1_1 0x44600110 > > >> +#define OMAP4470_ES1_0 0x44700100 > > > and used where? we do not support 4470 in u-boot today, and to my > > > knowledge, there is no plans to do it either. > > > > Used on a custom MMS board that I'm working upon; it is up and running U-Boot > > with a TI 750-2173 processor card, including USB EHCI (including HSIC devices). > > Please see patch 233501 on my (very initial) 4470/6032 support. > > > > If interested, I can post the board files as well. > there is no u-boot support for 4470 > $ git branch -v > * master c814263 Prepare v2013.04-rc2 > $ git grep 4470 .|grep OMAP > $ > > What is the point in having board files for an SoC that is not supported > in upstream?? My suggestion is that you either provide and maintain support for > the SoC upstream (considering that inside TI, there seems be to no known > motivation to do so) and introduce your board file, OR maintain this patch in > the u-boot fork for the vendor board. Those were patchwork numbers, not git hashes :) He's posted a v1 of board support for his platform already. -- Tom ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] OMAP4: Add ID for OMAP4470_ES1_0 2013-04-04 16:54 ` Tom Rini @ 2013-04-04 17:58 ` Nishanth Menon 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Nishanth Menon @ 2013-04-04 17:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot On 12:54-20130404, Tom Rini wrote: > On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 11:44:14AM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote: > > On 19:14-20130404, Lubomir Popov wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > On 04/04/13 19:00, Nishanth Menon wrote: > > > > On 18:57-20130404, Lubomir Popov wrote: > > > >> V2 fixes garbled subject. > > > > move this to diffstat section - here and in the rest of the patches. > > > >> > > > >> Signed-off-by: Lubomir Popov <lpopov@mm-sol.com> > > > >> > > > >> --- > > > >> arch/arm/include/asm/omap_common.h | 1 + > > > >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > >> > > > >> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/omap_common.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/omap_common.h > > > >> index 091ddb5..f042c10 100644 > > > >> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/omap_common.h > > > >> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/omap_common.h > > > >> @@ -573,6 +573,7 @@ static inline u32 omap_revision(void) > > > >> #define OMAP4430_ES2_3 0x44300230 > > > >> #define OMAP4460_ES1_0 0x44600100 > > > >> #define OMAP4460_ES1_1 0x44600110 > > > >> +#define OMAP4470_ES1_0 0x44700100 > > > > and used where? we do not support 4470 in u-boot today, and to my > > > > knowledge, there is no plans to do it either. > > > > > > Used on a custom MMS board that I'm working upon; it is up and running U-Boot > > > with a TI 750-2173 processor card, including USB EHCI (including HSIC devices). > > > Please see patch 233501 on my (very initial) 4470/6032 support. > > > > > > If interested, I can post the board files as well. > > there is no u-boot support for 4470 > > $ git branch -v > > * master c814263 Prepare v2013.04-rc2 > > $ git grep 4470 .|grep OMAP > > $ > > > > What is the point in having board files for an SoC that is not supported > > in upstream?? My suggestion is that you either provide and maintain support for > > the SoC upstream (considering that inside TI, there seems be to no known > > motivation to do so) and introduce your board file, OR maintain this patch in > > the u-boot fork for the vendor board. > > Those were patchwork numbers, not git hashes :) He's posted a v1 of > board support for his platform already. Aaah.. Thanks for the pointer. http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/233501/ this patch does belong to that series. unfortunately, it is a bit hard to review the pedigree of an patch when it is not properly sequenced :(. -- Regards, Nishanth Menon ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-04-04 17:58 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2013-04-04 15:57 [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] OMAP4: Add ID for OMAP4470_ES1_0 Lubomir Popov 2013-04-04 16:00 ` Nishanth Menon 2013-04-04 16:14 ` Lubomir Popov 2013-04-04 16:44 ` Nishanth Menon 2013-04-04 16:54 ` Tom Rini 2013-04-04 17:58 ` Nishanth Menon
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox