* [U-Boot] __kernel_size_t vs size_t which to use
@ 2015-11-03 1:41 Tyler
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Tyler @ 2015-11-03 1:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
hey folks,
busy list! Quick question.
I'm trying to build on ! linux and I'm just wondering about the
consistency of use of __kernel_size_t vs size_t use in the code base
what is 'correct'?
I end up with the a little bit of fallout when I build.
CC arch/arm/cpu/armv7/am33xx/board.o
In file included from ../include/linux/compat.h:4:0,
from ../include/dm/device.h:17,
from ../include/dm.h:10,
from ../arch/arm/cpu/armv7/am33xx/board.c:12:
../include/malloc.h:364:7: error: conflicting types for 'memset'
void* memset(void*, int, size_t);
^
In file included from ../include/common.h:22:0,
from ../arch/arm/cpu/armv7/am33xx/board.c:11:
../include/linux/string.h:78:15: note: previous declaration of 'memset'
was here
extern void * memset(void *,int,__kernel_size_t);
Quick examination shows we probably want to change the prototype in
include/malloc.h to be __kernel_size_t since the various machines
posix_types.h appear to be defining the correct width type to that
definition (most of the time anyway).
Is this the right thing to do?
Thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2015-11-03 1:41 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-11-03 1:41 [U-Boot] __kernel_size_t vs size_t which to use Tyler
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox