public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [PATCH 0/4] Updates for ClearFog EEPROM
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 15:22:53 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <877dyfei1u.fsf@tarshish> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d3254c1d-1f76-4ce0-386b-cc3fd243a0ff@denx.de>

Hi Stefan,

On Wed, Apr 15 2020, Stefan Roese wrote:
> On 19.01.20 08:10, Joel Johnson wrote:
>>
>> This set of patches applies on top of https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/cover/1200324/,
>> based on testing using the static configuration fallback updates in a
>> related patch series.
>>
>>
>> Joel Johnson (4):
>>    cmd: sys_eeprom: add missing implicit header
>>    cmd: sys_eeprom reflect I2C dependency in Kconfig
>>    arm: mvebu: clearfog: don't set SPL misc
>>    arm: mvebu: clearfog: fix compile w/o EEPROM
>>
>>   board/solidrun/clearfog/clearfog.c | 26 +++++++++++++++-----------
>>   cmd/Kconfig                        |  1 +
>>   cmd/sys_eeprom.c                   |  1 +
>>   configs/clearfog_defconfig         |  1 -
>>   4 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> Is it correct to assume, that this patchset is superseded by the
> Baruch's work? Can it be dropped?

Which work are you referring to?

The text quoted above specifically mentions dependency on my patch
series adding auto detection based on EEPROM data. So as I understand
these patches are still useful.

Joel, correct me if I am wrong.

baruch

--
     http://baruch.siach.name/blog/                  ~. .~   Tk Open Systems
=}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{=
   - baruch at tkos.co.il - tel: +972.52.368.4656, http://www.tkos.co.il -

  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-16 12:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-19  7:10 [PATCH 0/4] Updates for ClearFog EEPROM Joel Johnson
2020-01-19  7:10 ` [PATCH 1/4] cmd: sys_eeprom: add missing implicit header Joel Johnson
2020-01-19  7:10 ` [PATCH 2/4] cmd: sys_eeprom reflect I2C dependency in Kconfig Joel Johnson
2020-01-19  7:10 ` [PATCH 3/4] arm: mvebu: clearfog: don't set SPL misc Joel Johnson
2020-01-19  7:10 ` [PATCH 4/4] arm: mvebu: clearfog: fix compile w/o EEPROM Joel Johnson
2020-01-19  7:22 ` [PATCH 0/4] Updates for ClearFog EEPROM Baruch Siach
2020-01-19  7:29   ` Joel Johnson
2020-01-19  8:41     ` Baruch Siach
2020-01-19 16:10       ` Joel Johnson
2020-01-20 12:25         ` Baruch Siach
2020-01-20 17:01           ` Joel Johnson
2020-04-15  9:49 ` Stefan Roese
2020-04-16 12:22   ` Baruch Siach [this message]
2020-04-16 12:38     ` Stefan Roese
2020-04-16 14:36       ` Joel Johnson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=877dyfei1u.fsf@tarshish \
    --to=baruch@tkos.co.il \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox