U-Boot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] board: ti: am62x: Fix build without TI_I2C_BOARD_DETECT
@ 2026-07-15  3:32 Guo Hao via B4 Relay
  2026-07-15  5:44 ` Varadarajan Narayanan
  2026-07-16  7:38 ` Anshul Dalal
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Guo Hao via B4 Relay @ 2026-07-15  3:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Guillaume La Roque (TI.com), Mattijs Korpershoek, u-boot
  Cc: Bryan Brattlof, Tom Rini, Yao Zi, Patrice Chotard,
	Vishal Mahaveer, Peng Fan, Guo Hao

From: Guo Hao <guohaoprc@163.com>

setup_board_eeprom_env() and setup_serial_am6() are only available when
TI_I2C_BOARD_DETECT is enabled.

IS_ENABLED() does not remove the guarded statements during preprocessing,
so disabling TI_I2C_BOARD_DETECT results in an implicit function
declaration error. Use a preprocessor condition to match the condition
used for the function definition.

Fixes: ff1b83c095c2 ("board: am62x: Add support for reading eeprom data")
Signed-off-by: Guo Hao <guohaoprc@163.com>
---
 board/ti/am62x/evm.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/board/ti/am62x/evm.c b/board/ti/am62x/evm.c
index 49e58ad6d6c..f54abb56384 100644
--- a/board/ti/am62x/evm.c
+++ b/board/ti/am62x/evm.c
@@ -125,10 +125,10 @@ invalid_eeprom:
 #if CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(BOARD_LATE_INIT)
 int board_late_init(void)
 {
-	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TI_I2C_BOARD_DETECT)) {
-		setup_board_eeprom_env();
-		setup_serial_am6();
-	}
+#if CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(TI_I2C_BOARD_DETECT)
+	setup_board_eeprom_env();
+	setup_serial_am6();
+#endif
 
 	ti_set_fdt_env(NULL, NULL);
 	return 0;

---
base-commit: 501d76ca801343cce6dafb17740a8b679ed17072
change-id: 20260715-am62x-no-board-detect-6b2eb4f7dd06

Best regards,
--  
Guo Hao <guohaoprc@163.com>



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] board: ti: am62x: Fix build without TI_I2C_BOARD_DETECT
  2026-07-15  3:32 [PATCH] board: ti: am62x: Fix build without TI_I2C_BOARD_DETECT Guo Hao via B4 Relay
@ 2026-07-15  5:44 ` Varadarajan Narayanan
  2026-07-16  7:38 ` Anshul Dalal
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Varadarajan Narayanan @ 2026-07-15  5:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: guohaoprc
  Cc: Guillaume La Roque (TI.com), Mattijs Korpershoek, u-boot,
	Bryan Brattlof, Tom Rini, Yao Zi, Patrice Chotard,
	Vishal Mahaveer, Peng Fan

On Wed, Jul 15, 2026 at 11:32:26AM +0800, Guo Hao via B4 Relay wrote:
> From: Guo Hao <guohaoprc@163.com>
>
> setup_board_eeprom_env() and setup_serial_am6() are only available when
> TI_I2C_BOARD_DETECT is enabled.
>
> IS_ENABLED() does not remove the guarded statements during preprocessing,
> so disabling TI_I2C_BOARD_DETECT results in an implicit function
> declaration error. Use a preprocessor condition to match the condition
> used for the function definition.
>
> Fixes: ff1b83c095c2 ("board: am62x: Add support for reading eeprom data")
> Signed-off-by: Guo Hao <guohaoprc@163.com>

Reviewed-by: Varadarajan Narayanan <varadarajan.narayanan@oss.qualcomm.com>

[ . . . ]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] board: ti: am62x: Fix build without TI_I2C_BOARD_DETECT
  2026-07-15  3:32 [PATCH] board: ti: am62x: Fix build without TI_I2C_BOARD_DETECT Guo Hao via B4 Relay
  2026-07-15  5:44 ` Varadarajan Narayanan
@ 2026-07-16  7:38 ` Anshul Dalal
  2026-07-21  8:14   ` Mattijs Korpershoek via U-Boot
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Anshul Dalal @ 2026-07-16  7:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Guo Hao
  Cc: Guillaume La Roque (TI.com), Mattijs Korpershoek, u-boot,
	Bryan Brattlof, Tom Rini, Yao Zi, Patrice Chotard,
	Vishal Mahaveer, Peng Fan

On Wed, 15 Jul 2026 11:32:26 +0800, Guo Hao <guohaoprc@163.com> wrote:
> setup_board_eeprom_env() and setup_serial_am6() are only available when
> TI_I2C_BOARD_DETECT is enabled.
> 
> IS_ENABLED() does not remove the guarded statements during preprocessing,
> so disabling TI_I2C_BOARD_DETECT results in an implicit function
> declaration error. Use a preprocessor condition to match the condition
> used for the function definition.
> 
> Fixes: ff1b83c095c2 ("board: am62x: Add support for reading eeprom data")
> Signed-off-by: Guo Hao <guohaoprc@163.com>

This is a valid fix however I wonder if there's an actual use-case where someone
might want to disable TI_I2C_BOARD_DETECT on an EVM board.

Also, it looks like the same issue exists for other platforms too (AM64x, AM65x,
J721s2 ...).

-- 
Anshul Dalal <anshuld@ti.com>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] board: ti: am62x: Fix build without TI_I2C_BOARD_DETECT
  2026-07-16  7:38 ` Anshul Dalal
@ 2026-07-21  8:14   ` Mattijs Korpershoek via U-Boot
       [not found]     ` <7b7be0c1.8185.19f841a7a0c.Coremail.guohaoprc@163.com>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Mattijs Korpershoek via U-Boot @ 2026-07-21  8:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Anshul Dalal, Guo Hao
  Cc: Guillaume La Roque (TI.com), Mattijs Korpershoek, u-boot,
	Bryan Brattlof, Tom Rini, Yao Zi, Patrice Chotard,
	Vishal Mahaveer, Peng Fan

On Thu, Jul 16, 2026 at 13:08, Anshul Dalal <anshuld@ti.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 15 Jul 2026 11:32:26 +0800, Guo Hao <guohaoprc@163.com> wrote:
>> setup_board_eeprom_env() and setup_serial_am6() are only available when
>> TI_I2C_BOARD_DETECT is enabled.
>> 
>> IS_ENABLED() does not remove the guarded statements during preprocessing,
>> so disabling TI_I2C_BOARD_DETECT results in an implicit function
>> declaration error. Use a preprocessor condition to match the condition
>> used for the function definition.
>> 
>> Fixes: ff1b83c095c2 ("board: am62x: Add support for reading eeprom data")
>> Signed-off-by: Guo Hao <guohaoprc@163.com>
>
> This is a valid fix however I wonder if there's an actual use-case where someone
> might want to disable TI_I2C_BOARD_DETECT on an EVM board.

I agree with Anshul here. What's the use use-case for disabling i2c
board detection?

Also, if we really want it disabled, we could also create stub functions
instead of replacing this.

>
> Also, it looks like the same issue exists for other platforms too (AM64x, AM65x,
> J721s2 ...).
>
> -- 
> Anshul Dalal <anshuld@ti.com>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re:Re: [PATCH] board: ti: am62x: Fix build without TI_I2C_BOARD_DETECT
       [not found]     ` <7b7be0c1.8185.19f841a7a0c.Coremail.guohaoprc@163.com>
@ 2026-07-21 14:14       ` Mattijs Korpershoek via U-Boot
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Mattijs Korpershoek via U-Boot @ 2026-07-21 14:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 国豪, Mattijs Korpershoek
  Cc: Anshul Dalal, Guillaume La Roque (TI.com), u-boot, Bryan Brattlof,
	Tom Rini, Yao Zi, Patrice Chotard, Vishal Mahaveer, Peng Fan

On Tue, Jul 21, 2026 at 17:55, 国豪  <guohaoprc@163.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
> Thanks for the question.
>
>
> My use case is a third-party board based on the AM6254 SoC, rather than a TI
> EVM. The board reuses the common AM62x EVM boot flow, but it does not have a TI
> AM6-compatible board EEPROM. Its board identity and device tree selection are
> fixed by the board configuration.

I see, thanks for the explanation.
I think that this should be mentioned in the commit message.

>
>
> I verified this behavior on the board. With TI_I2C_BOARD_DETECT enabled, U-Boot
> probes I2C addresses 0x50 and 0x51, and both probes fail. The AM62x late-init
> code then sets:
>
>
>         board_name=am62x_skevm
>         board_rev=unknown
>         board_software_revision=unknown
>         board_serial=unknown
>         serial#=0000000000000000
>
>
> This information is incorrect for the third-party board. Its configuration
> therefore uses:
>
>
>         CONFIG_BOARD_LATE_INIT=y
>         # CONFIG_TI_I2C_BOARD_DETECT is not set
>
>
> This keeps the board late-init hook, including the fdtfile setup, while
> disabling the TI EVM EEPROM detection.
>
>
> The submitted patch fixes the build error for this valid configuration. I am
> also fine with the suggested no-op stubs, provided they preserve the behavior
> of not applying EVM fallback information or setting a serial number when board
> detection is disabled.

I have a slight preference for adding setup_board_eeprom_env() and
setup_serial_am6() as no-op stubs. But I'm not the TI board maintainer
so I let them decide.

>
>
> I limited this patch to AM62x, which is the platform I tested. I agree that the
> same pattern should be addressed for the other affected platforms as well.
>
>
> Best regards,
> Guo Hao
>
>
>
> At 2026-07-21 16:14:08, "Mattijs Korpershoek" <mkorpershoek@kernel.org> wrote:
>>On Thu, Jul 16, 2026 at 13:08, Anshul Dalal <anshuld@ti.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 15 Jul 2026 11:32:26 +0800, Guo Hao <guohaoprc@163.com> wrote:
>>>> setup_board_eeprom_env() and setup_serial_am6() are only available when
>>>> TI_I2C_BOARD_DETECT is enabled.
>>>> 
>>>> IS_ENABLED() does not remove the guarded statements during preprocessing,
>>>> so disabling TI_I2C_BOARD_DETECT results in an implicit function
>>>> declaration error. Use a preprocessor condition to match the condition
>>>> used for the function definition.
>>>> 
>>>> Fixes: ff1b83c095c2 ("board: am62x: Add support for reading eeprom data")
>>>> Signed-off-by: Guo Hao <guohaoprc@163.com>
>>>
>>> This is a valid fix however I wonder if there's an actual use-case where someone
>>> might want to disable TI_I2C_BOARD_DETECT on an EVM board.
>>
>>I agree with Anshul here. What's the use use-case for disabling i2c
>>board detection?
>>
>>Also, if we really want it disabled, we could also create stub functions
>>instead of replacing this.
>>
>>>
>>> Also, it looks like the same issue exists for other platforms too (AM64x, AM65x,
>>> J721s2 ...).
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Anshul Dalal <anshuld@ti.com>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-07-21 14:14 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-07-15  3:32 [PATCH] board: ti: am62x: Fix build without TI_I2C_BOARD_DETECT Guo Hao via B4 Relay
2026-07-15  5:44 ` Varadarajan Narayanan
2026-07-16  7:38 ` Anshul Dalal
2026-07-21  8:14   ` Mattijs Korpershoek via U-Boot
     [not found]     ` <7b7be0c1.8185.19f841a7a0c.Coremail.guohaoprc@163.com>
2026-07-21 14:14       ` Mattijs Korpershoek via U-Boot

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox