From: Mattijs Korpershoek <mkorpershoek@baylibre.com>
To: Igor Opaniuk <igor.opaniuk@gmail.com>
Cc: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>,
Julien Masson <jmasson@baylibre.com>,
Guillaume La Roque <glaroque@baylibre.com>,
Dmitrii Merkurev <dimorinny@google.com>,
Roman Stratiienko <r.stratiienko@gmail.com>,
u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] boot: android: Add image_android_get_version()
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2024 11:01:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87sexjzwch.fsf@baylibre.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAByghJa6gLyJHB7z3ME0JPewZ3JJizmY54XBO3MeX3TMrzB_tA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Igor,
Thank you for the review.
On lun., juin 10, 2024 at 11:20, Igor Opaniuk <igor.opaniuk@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Mattijs,
>
> On Thu, Jun 6, 2024 at 2:24 PM Mattijs Korpershoek
> <mkorpershoek@baylibre.com> wrote:
>>
>> When reading a boot image header, we may need to retrieve the header
>> version.
>>
>> Add a helper function for it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mattijs Korpershoek <mkorpershoek@baylibre.com>
>> ---
>> boot/image-android.c | 7 ++++++-
>> include/image.h | 7 +++++++
>> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/boot/image-android.c b/boot/image-android.c
>> index ddd8ffd5e540..4f8fb51585eb 100644
>> --- a/boot/image-android.c
>> +++ b/boot/image-android.c
>> @@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ bool android_image_get_data(const void *boot_hdr, const void *vendor_boot_hdr,
>> return false;
>> }
>>
>> - if (((struct andr_boot_img_hdr_v0 *)boot_hdr)->header_version > 2) {
>> + if (android_image_get_version(boot_hdr) > 2) {
>> if (!vendor_boot_hdr) {
>> printf("For boot header v3+ vendor boot image has to be provided\n");
>> return false;
>> @@ -203,6 +203,11 @@ bool android_image_get_data(const void *boot_hdr, const void *vendor_boot_hdr,
>> return true;
>> }
>>
>> +u32 android_image_get_version(const void *hdr)
>> +{
>> + return ((struct andr_boot_img_hdr_v0 *)hdr)->header_version;
>> +}
>> +
>> static ulong android_image_get_kernel_addr(struct andr_image_data *img_data)
>> {
>> /*
>> diff --git a/include/image.h b/include/image.h
>> index acffd17e0dfd..18e5ced5ab42 100644
>> --- a/include/image.h
>> +++ b/include/image.h
>> @@ -1963,6 +1963,13 @@ bool is_android_boot_image_header(const void *hdr);
>> */
>> bool is_android_vendor_boot_image_header(const void *vendor_boot_img);
>>
>> +/**
>> + * android_image_get_version() - Retrieve the boot.img version
>> + *
>> + * Return: Android boot image header version.
>> + */
>> +u32 android_image_get_version(const void *hdr);
>> +
>> /**
>> * get_abootimg_addr() - Get Android boot image address
>> *
>>
>> --
>> 2.45.0
>>
> why introduce a helper function if there is only one user of it?
I added a second user of the helper function in patch 5/6.
>
> android_image_get_data() expects andr_boot_img_hdr_v0 anyway,
> as it has an explicit check for it in the very beginning
> (is_android_boot_image_header()).
Right.
>
> Have you considered adjusting android_image_get_data() declaration, and just use
> andr_boot_img_hdr_v0 *boot_hdr as first param instead (like it's done
> for example in
> android_boot_image_v0_v1_v2_parse_hdr()) and then rely on implicit
> cast when this
> function is used.
>
> this is of course all a matter of preference, just thinking out loud
I've given this some more thought, and since I'm already using
struct andr_boot_img_hdr_v0 in bootmeth_android/scan_boot_part(), I will
drop this patch for v2.
The helper seems indeed a bit useless given that we can use the struct's
member for this.
Thanks!
>
> --
> Best regards - Atentamente - Meilleures salutations
>
> Igor Opaniuk
>
> mailto: igor.opaniuk@gmail.com
> skype: igor.opanyuk
> https://www.linkedin.com/in/iopaniuk
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-11 9:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-06 12:23 [PATCH 0/6] bootstd: Add Android support Mattijs Korpershoek
2024-06-06 12:23 ` [PATCH 1/6] boot: android: Provide vendor_bootimg_addr in boot_get_fdt() Mattijs Korpershoek
2024-06-10 8:51 ` Igor Opaniuk
2024-06-06 12:23 ` [PATCH 2/6] boot: android: Add image_android_get_version() Mattijs Korpershoek
2024-06-10 9:20 ` Igor Opaniuk
2024-06-11 9:01 ` Mattijs Korpershoek [this message]
2024-06-06 12:23 ` [PATCH 3/6] bootstd: Add bootflow_iter_check_mmc() helper Mattijs Korpershoek
2024-06-10 9:31 ` Igor Opaniuk
2024-06-11 9:06 ` Mattijs Korpershoek
2024-06-06 12:23 ` [PATCH 4/6] android: boot: Add set_abootimg_addr() and set_avendor_bootimg_addr() Mattijs Korpershoek
2024-06-10 14:27 ` Igor Opaniuk
2024-06-06 12:23 ` [PATCH 5/6] bootstd: Add a bootmeth for Android Mattijs Korpershoek
2024-06-10 15:15 ` Igor Opaniuk
2024-06-11 9:32 ` Mattijs Korpershoek
2024-06-11 18:52 ` Simon Glass
2024-06-12 10:18 ` Mattijs Korpershoek
2024-06-06 12:23 ` [PATCH 6/6] bootstd: Add test for bootmeth_android Mattijs Korpershoek
2024-06-11 18:52 ` Simon Glass
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87sexjzwch.fsf@baylibre.com \
--to=mkorpershoek@baylibre.com \
--cc=dimorinny@google.com \
--cc=glaroque@baylibre.com \
--cc=igor.opaniuk@gmail.com \
--cc=jmasson@baylibre.com \
--cc=r.stratiienko@gmail.com \
--cc=sjg@chromium.org \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox