From: Mathieu Othacehe <m.othacehe@gmail.com>
To: Primoz Fiser <primoz.fiser@norik.com>
Cc: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>, Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>,
Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
"NXP i . MX U-Boot Team" <uboot-imx@nxp.com>,
Christoph Stoidner <c.stoidner@phytec.de>,
Wadim Egorov <w.egorov@phytec.de>,
u-boot@lists.denx.de, upstream@lists.phytec.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add Phytec i.MX93 support
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 12:04:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ttnavr5u.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9add814d-540b-4ddb-8cfc-261e62049d7e@norik.com> (Primoz Fiser's message of "Thu, 18 Jan 2024 11:47:52 +0100")
Hi,
Thanks for the review!
> s/imx93_phycore/phycore_imx93
>
> To fit into existing PHYTEC boards already in tree.
I deliberately picked that order so that it is aligned with most imx
boards already supported by u-boot.
The supported imx93 boards follow that pattern:
- imx93_var_som
- imx93_evk
So it felt natural to have:
- imx93_phycore
Plus the kernel device-trees are also following that order:
- imx93-phycore-xxx
On the other hand, it is true that the existing phycore boards use the
phytec_* pattern:
- phycore_am335x_r2
- phycore_imx8mm
- phycore_imx8mp
- phycore_rk3288/
So that will be confusing no matter the option that we choose.
I will come up with a v2 fixing your other remarks, but I think that
this should be addressed beforehand.
Thanks,
Mathieu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-18 12:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-17 7:52 [PATCH] Add Phytec i.MX93 support Mathieu Othacehe
2024-01-17 10:36 ` Fabio Estevam
2024-01-18 10:47 ` Primoz Fiser
2024-01-18 11:04 ` Mathieu Othacehe [this message]
2024-01-19 6:49 ` [Upstream] " Yannic Moog
2024-01-19 7:21 ` Yannic Moog
2024-01-24 13:30 ` Mathieu Othacehe
2024-01-24 13:46 ` Yannic Moog
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ttnavr5u.fsf@gmail.com \
--to=m.othacehe@gmail.com \
--cc=c.stoidner@phytec.de \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=peng.fan@nxp.com \
--cc=primoz.fiser@norik.com \
--cc=sbabic@denx.de \
--cc=trini@konsulko.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
--cc=uboot-imx@nxp.com \
--cc=upstream@lists.phytec.de \
--cc=w.egorov@phytec.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox