From: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>
To: Guodong Xu <guodong@riscstar.com>
Cc: Takahiro Kuwano <takahiro.kuwano@infineon.com>,
u-boot@lists.denx.de, u-boot-spacemit@groups.io,
Vignesh R <vigneshr@ti.com>, Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>,
Raymond Mao <raymond.mao@riscstar.com>,
Rick Chen <rick@andestech.com>, Leo <ycliang@andestech.com>,
Huan Zhou <pericycle.cc@gmail.com>, Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>,
Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@linaro.org>,
Mayuresh Chitale <mchitale@ventanamicro.com>,
Yao Zi <me@ziyao.cc>, Anis Chali <chalianis1@gmail.com>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>,
Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@linux.dev>,
Heiko Schocher <hs@nabladev.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <ravi@prevas.dk>,
Philip Molloy <philip.molloy@analog.com>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@amd.com>,
Yegor Yefremov <yegorslists@googlemail.com>,
Eoin Dickson <eoin.dickson@microchip.com>,
Tanmay Kathpalia <tanmay.kathpalia@altera.com>,
Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Casey Connolly <casey.connolly@linaro.org>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>,
Guodong Xu <guodong.xu@riscstar.com>,
Rui Miguel Silva <rui.silva@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/9] spacemit: k1: Add multiple device tree support
Date: Sun, 24 May 2026 23:25:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ahNs0lme0ya2zolV@aurel32.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260520-b4-k1-spl-pinctrl-spinor-v2-6-8d25db98ac8e@riscstar.com>
Hi,
On 2026-05-20 06:45, Guodong Xu wrote:
> Enable multiple DTB support in the FIT image for the Spacemit K1 SoC,
> allowing a single U-Boot binary to support different board variants.
>
> The SPL reads the board type from EEPROM and selects the corresponding
> device tree at runtime via board_fit_config_name_match(), ensuring the
> correct hardware description is passed to U-Boot proper.
>
> Signed-off-by: Guodong Xu <guodong@riscstar.com>
>
> ---
> v2:
> - Reworked. Drop the v1 approach (new local k1-muse-pi-pro.dts,
> enlarge SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN, MMODE switch).
> - Use binman --fit-multi-config so u-boot.itb packs multiple board
> DTs from the upstream tree.
> ---
> board/spacemit/k1/spl.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> configs/spacemit_k1_defconfig | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/board/spacemit/k1/spl.c b/board/spacemit/k1/spl.c
> index da4169fbc8c..d749e21a2d5 100644
> --- a/board/spacemit/k1/spl.c
> +++ b/board/spacemit/k1/spl.c
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
> #include <dm/device.h>
> #include <dm/uclass.h>
> #include <i2c.h>
> +#include <linux/ctype.h>
> #include <linux/delay.h>
> #include <log.h>
> #include <power/regulator.h>
> @@ -55,6 +56,8 @@ struct ddr_cfg {
> binman_sym_declare(ulong, ddr_fw, image_pos);
> binman_sym_declare(ulong, ddr_fw, size);
>
> +char product_name[I2C_BUF_SIZE] = "k1";
> +
> static void i2c_early_init(void)
> {
> struct udevice *bus;
> @@ -322,14 +325,8 @@ void nor_early_init(void)
> udelay(10);
> }
>
> -void *board_spl_fit_buffer_addr(ulong fit_size, int sectors, int bl_len)
> -{
> - return (void *)CONFIG_SPL_LOAD_FIT_ADDRESS;
> -}
> -
> void board_init_f(ulong dummy)
> {
> - u8 i2c_buf[I2C_BUF_SIZE] = { 0 };
> int ret;
>
> ret = spl_early_init();
> @@ -344,11 +341,11 @@ void board_init_f(ulong dummy)
> preloader_console_init();
>
> i2c_early_init();
> - ret = read_product_name(i2c_buf, I2C_BUF_SIZE);
> + ret = read_product_name(product_name, I2C_BUF_SIZE);
> if (ret)
> log_info("Fail to detect board:%d\n", ret);
> else
> - log_info("Get board name:%s\n", (char *)i2c_buf);
> + log_info("Get board name:%s\n", product_name);
> pmic_init();
>
> ddr_early_init();
> @@ -363,3 +360,32 @@ u32 spl_boot_device(void)
> void spl_board_init(void)
> {
> }
> +
> +int board_fit_config_name_match(const char *name)
> +{
> + char fdt_name[I2C_BUF_SIZE];
> + int i;
> +
> + memset(fdt_name, 0, I2C_BUF_SIZE);
> + if (!strncmp(product_name, "k1-x_", 5)) {
> + snprintf(fdt_name, I2C_BUF_SIZE, "%s-%s", "k1",
> + &product_name[5]);
> + }
I wonder if any normalisation would be better in board_init_f() as
board_fit_config_name_match() is basically called for each possible
board. Same for the tolower() loop below.
> + if (fdt_name[0] == '\0') {
> + /* set default board name */
> + sprintf(fdt_name, "k1-musepi-pro");
> + }
I am not sure k1-musepi-pro is a good default. The experience is that
the Banana-Pi F3 (known as k1-x_deb1 in the vendor code) doesn't have a
product name defined in the TLV EEPROM and thus should probably be the
default.
> + for (i = 0; i < I2C_BUF_SIZE; i++) {
> + if (fdt_name[i] == '\0')
> + break;
> + fdt_name[i] = tolower(fdt_name[i]);
> + }
> + if (!strcmp(name, fdt_name))
> + return 0;
I am not sure that all the vendor product names will match the linux dtb
names, so maybe just using a table to do the mapping would be better.
Anyway, as long as the musepi-pro is the only one supported that should
be fine.
Regards
Aurelien
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurelien@aurel32.net http://aurel32.net
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-24 21:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-20 10:45 [PATCH v2 0/9] riscv: spacemit: k1: add pinctrl/GPIO and SPI NOR support Guodong Xu
2026-05-20 10:45 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] mtd: spi: select SPL_SPI_FLASH_TINY in SPL stage Guodong Xu
2026-05-27 13:28 ` Kathpalia, Tanmay
2026-05-20 10:45 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] mtd: spi: enable spi_nor_remove() in soft reset config Guodong Xu
2026-05-27 13:40 ` Kathpalia, Tanmay
2026-05-20 10:45 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] spi: fsl: add support for Spacemit K1 SoC Guodong Xu
2026-05-20 10:45 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] spl: k1: enable SPI NOR flash detection and boot Guodong Xu
2026-05-20 10:45 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] riscv: binman: Always set default configuration in FIT image Guodong Xu
2026-05-20 10:45 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] spacemit: k1: Add multiple device tree support Guodong Xu
2026-05-24 21:25 ` Aurelien Jarno [this message]
2026-05-26 13:24 ` Guodong Xu
2026-05-26 13:36 ` Simon Glass
2026-06-04 14:21 ` Guodong Xu
2026-05-20 10:45 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] pinctrl: add pinctrl driver for Spacemit K1 SoC Guodong Xu
2026-05-20 10:45 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] gpio: add gpio " Guodong Xu
2026-05-20 10:45 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] configs: k1: enable pinctrl and gpio Guodong Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ahNs0lme0ya2zolV@aurel32.net \
--to=aurelien@aurel32.net \
--cc=casey.connolly@linaro.org \
--cc=chalianis1@gmail.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=eoin.dickson@microchip.com \
--cc=guodong.xu@riscstar.com \
--cc=guodong@riscstar.com \
--cc=hs@nabladev.com \
--cc=mchitale@ventanamicro.com \
--cc=me@ziyao.cc \
--cc=michal.simek@amd.com \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=peng.fan@nxp.com \
--cc=pericycle.cc@gmail.com \
--cc=philip.molloy@analog.com \
--cc=ravi@prevas.dk \
--cc=raymond.mao@riscstar.com \
--cc=rick@andestech.com \
--cc=rui.silva@linaro.org \
--cc=sean.anderson@linux.dev \
--cc=semen.protsenko@linaro.org \
--cc=sumit.garg@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=takahiro.kuwano@infineon.com \
--cc=tanmay.kathpalia@altera.com \
--cc=trini@konsulko.com \
--cc=u-boot-spacemit@groups.io \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
--cc=ycliang@andestech.com \
--cc=yegorslists@googlemail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox