public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [U-Boot] why does fdt_fixup_ethernet() need to worry about an edited FDT?
@ 2016-05-24 12:55 Robert P. J. Day
  2016-05-25  2:23 ` Bin Meng
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Robert P. J. Day @ 2016-05-24 12:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot


  looking at the code for fdt_fixup_ethernet() in fdt_support.c, and
i'm puzzled by the extra work being done ostensibly to take an
"edited" FDT into account:

  void fdt_fixup_ethernet(void *fdt)
  {
        int i, j, prop;
        char *tmp, *end;
        char mac[16];
        const char *path;
        unsigned char mac_addr[6];
        int offset;

        if (fdt_path_offset(fdt, "/aliases") < 0)
                return;

        /* Cycle through all aliases */
        for (prop = 0; ; prop++) {
                const char *name;
                int len = strlen("ethernet");

                /* FDT might have been edited, recompute the offset */
                offset = fdt_first_property_offset(fdt,
                        fdt_path_offset(fdt, "/aliases"));
                /* Select property number 'prop' */
                for (i = 0; i < prop; i++)
                        offset = fdt_next_property_offset(fdt, offset);
                ... snip ...

  why is it that *this* routine has to worry about an edited FDT, but
nothing else i see in that entire source file has to? as a (hopefully)
relevant example:

  #if defined(OF_STDOUT_PATH)
  static int fdt_fixup_stdout(void *fdt, int chosenoff)
  {
        return fdt_setprop(fdt, chosenoff, "linux,stdout-path",
                              OF_STDOUT_PATH, strlen(OF_STDOUT_PATH) + 1);
  }

that routine simply calls fdt_setprop() ... what is it about
fdt_fixup_ethernet() that needs to take extra care compared to every
other function in that file?

rday

-- 

========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day                                 Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
                        http://crashcourse.ca

Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn:                               http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* [U-Boot] why does fdt_fixup_ethernet() need to worry about an edited FDT?
  2016-05-24 12:55 [U-Boot] why does fdt_fixup_ethernet() need to worry about an edited FDT? Robert P. J. Day
@ 2016-05-25  2:23 ` Bin Meng
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Bin Meng @ 2016-05-25  2:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 8:55 PM, Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@crashcourse.ca> wrote:
>
>   looking at the code for fdt_fixup_ethernet() in fdt_support.c, and
> i'm puzzled by the extra work being done ostensibly to take an
> "edited" FDT into account:
>
>   void fdt_fixup_ethernet(void *fdt)
>   {
>         int i, j, prop;
>         char *tmp, *end;
>         char mac[16];
>         const char *path;
>         unsigned char mac_addr[6];
>         int offset;
>
>         if (fdt_path_offset(fdt, "/aliases") < 0)
>                 return;
>
>         /* Cycle through all aliases */
>         for (prop = 0; ; prop++) {
>                 const char *name;
>                 int len = strlen("ethernet");
>
>                 /* FDT might have been edited, recompute the offset */
>                 offset = fdt_first_property_offset(fdt,
>                         fdt_path_offset(fdt, "/aliases"));
>                 /* Select property number 'prop' */
>                 for (i = 0; i < prop; i++)
>                         offset = fdt_next_property_offset(fdt, offset);
>                 ... snip ...
>
>   why is it that *this* routine has to worry about an edited FDT, but
> nothing else i see in that entire source file has to? as a (hopefully)
> relevant example:
>
>   #if defined(OF_STDOUT_PATH)
>   static int fdt_fixup_stdout(void *fdt, int chosenoff)
>   {
>         return fdt_setprop(fdt, chosenoff, "linux,stdout-path",
>                               OF_STDOUT_PATH, strlen(OF_STDOUT_PATH) + 1);
>   }
>
> that routine simply calls fdt_setprop() ... what is it about
> fdt_fixup_ethernet() that needs to take extra care compared to every
> other function in that file?
>

Commit a434fd1d282fd32d81296c6d4c2e0911f6e488b3 explains this.

Regards,
Bin

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2016-05-25  2:23 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-05-24 12:55 [U-Boot] why does fdt_fixup_ethernet() need to worry about an edited FDT? Robert P. J. Day
2016-05-25  2:23 ` Bin Meng

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox