[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/6] arm: am57xx: cl-som-am57x: fix XHCI registers base address

[Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>]

On Sunday 12 February 2017 09:17 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 10:55:27AM +0200, Uri Mashiach wrote:
>> Hi Tom,
>>
>> On 02/09/2017 10:29 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 09:00:26AM +0200, Uri Mashiach wrote:
>>>
>>>> The following XHCI registers base address are set to OMAP5 values:
>>>> OMAP_XHCI_BASE, OMAP_OCP1_SCP_BASE, OMAP_OTG_WRAPPER_BASE
>>>>
>>>> Captured crash for "usb start" command:
>>>> ----------------------------------cut----------------------------------
>>>> => usb start
>>>> starting USB...
>>>> USB0:   data abort
>>>> pc : [<fff63d22>]          lr : [<fff63b63>]
>>>> reloc pc : [<8081cd22>]    lr : [<8081cb63>]
>>>> sp : fdf42d08  ip : fff9e040     fp : fdf42d50
>>>> r10: fff8a998  r9 : fdf42ef0     r8 : 00000000
>>>> r7 : fdf42d28  r6 : fdf42d2c     r5 : fffa5c00  r4 : 00000000
>>>> r3 : 4a020000  r2 : 00000000     r1 : fdf42e78  r0 : fffa5c00
>>>> Flags: nzCv  IRQs off  FIQs off  Mode SVC_32
>>>> Resetting CPU ...
>>>>
>>>> resetting ...
>>>> ----------------------------------cut----------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> Fix by adding the CL-SOM-AM57x target to the XHCI registers base address
>>>> ifdef'ery.
>>>> A better fix should be based on a SOC family defines (currently
>>>> missing).
>>>
>>> Can you please go add the Kconfig symbols that would be the better
>>> solution please?  Thanks!
>>
>> The SOC family symbol CONFIG_AM57XX was removed by the commit
>> 3891a54: "ARM: DRA7x/AM57xx: Get rid of CONFIG_AM57XX".
>> Maybe the symbol should be reintroduced just for the XHCI registers
>> section?
> 
> Yes, sounds like we do have a case where DRA7xx is not the same as
> AM57xx then?
> 

No that's not right. It is just DRA74x_EVM and AM57XX evm is using
different instances of XHCI. Ideally this base address should be coming
from DT. I don't think it is a good idea to introduce CONFIG_AM57XX.

Thanks and regards,
Lokesh