SBus in 2.3

SBus in 2.3

[Pete Zaitcev]

Fellow 64 bit enabled hackers,

If I understand correctly, 2.3 is in use on sparc64 for some time.
Do you guys have any problems on Ultra-1/140?
I did regressions on sparc64 for my sparc putback today as it touches
some common files and there was some strage problem on U-1,
which looks like this:

[root@iolab130 /root]# ifconfig eth0 up  
IRQ: Trying to share non-PCI bucket.
Lance: Can't get irq 5,7e1
SIOCSIFFLAGS: Resource temporarily unavailable

Hmm... I would track it down myself but I do not have good
access to sparc64's. Any ideas?

--Pete

Re: SBus in 2.3

[David S. Miller]

   From: Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@metabyte.com>
   Date:   Sun, 17 Oct 1999 19:17:49 -0700 (PDT)

   [root@iolab130 /root]# ifconfig eth0 up  
   IRQ: Trying to share non-PCI bucket.
   Lance: Can't get irq 5,7e1
   SIOCSIFFLAGS: Resource temporarily unavailable

   Hmm... I would track it down myself but I do not have good
   access to sparc64's. Any ideas?

Two SBUS devices have the same INO irq number in their sbus_dev
state structure, or the Lance driver is registering it twice.

It's extremely hard to screw this up, if you made the new
code behave identically in drivers/sbus/sbus.c for the sparc64
IRQ probing cases.

Later,
David S. Miller
davem@redhat.com