From: Joshua Uziel <uzi@uzix.org>
To: ultralinux@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: where is ultra linux going?
Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2001 13:19:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-ultrasparc-98353928632005@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-ultrasparc-98345984016489@msgid-missing>
* Martin A. Marques <martin@math.unl.edu.ar> [010302 04:16]:
> Yes, but it seems as the other platforms are having lots of more attention,
> especially due to the fact that SUN isn't giving much help, because they
> support there Solaris operating system.
Well, honestly, who can blame Sun? Things are going so well that they
don't seem to feel that they should do anything. Actually, I take that
back... some people within Sun see the value and are cooperating with
the SPARC/Linux developers... some examples:
* Machines are loaned to linux distributors for working on distributions
as well as showing SPARC/Linux at tradeshows. Most (if not all)
SPARCs at LWENY recently were owned by Sun. This included the one in
the SuSE booth, the one in the Slackware/BSDI booth, and the one in
the Debian booth. Most of the work put into Slackware and Debian for
SPARC are built on machines loaned by Sun.
* Sun Microelectronics for a while involved DaveM in working to improve
Linux support for the AX motherboards.
* I'm being loaned an AX1105-500 for the purpose of working on support
for it and the new Sun Blade 100 (which is very similar).
Most of the other platforms have a Unix variant that is dead or at least
on it's way... Solaris still seems to be quite healthy.
> With respect of the distros, yes, we have just installed SUSE on an ultra5,
> and I have been looking at the Debian distribution. But are they fully 64bit?
> Have all the aplications been compiled for 64 bit SPARC? I know that this
> isn't the case of Debian, and I'm starting to think that the solution is to
> stick with Solaris or change the architecture (alpha maybe).
Speaking with Ben Collins (Debian) and Thorsten Kukuk (SuSE), they've
both played with 64-bit userspace. It seems that glibc is more or less
ready, but the compiler (eventually gcc 3.0) still needs work. Using
Jakub Jelinek's hacked compiler, though, you can now have a 64-bit
userspace on SPARC/Linux, but it's more or less experimental. In other
words, a 64-bit userland is "coming soon", but not here yet. Besides,
for the most part, a 64-bit userspace isn't all that needed. Even
Solaris ships with mostly 32-bit applications, and only 64-bit when it
really counts.
> It's all IMHO.
Of course. :)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ultralinux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-03-02 13:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-03-01 15:06 where is ultra linux going? Martin A. Marques
2001-03-01 23:10 ` Joshua Uziel
2001-03-01 23:49 ` dan carter
2001-03-02 0:40 ` Joshua Uziel
2001-03-02 12:12 ` Martin A. Marques
2001-03-02 13:19 ` Joshua Uziel [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-linux-ultrasparc-98353928632005@msgid-missing \
--to=uzi@uzix.org \
--cc=ultralinux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox