From: Matt Burgess <matthew@linuxfromscratch.org>
To: util-linux <util-linux@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: mount -f regression in v2.21's new-mount
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 22:43:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1331073821.1882.16.camel@kyoto.localdomain> (raw)
Hi,
First off, apologies in advance for the probably useless bug report that
follows! I'm only reporting it here because it *appears* to be a
regression but I can't reproduce it under a minimised test-case.
Linux From Scratch's bootscripts mount a tmpfs at /run using the rather
trivial 'mount -n /run'. The corresponding fstab entry is:
# file system mount-point type options dump fsck order
tmpfs /run tmpfs defaults 0 0
A little later on in the boot sequence, it then does a 'mount -f /run'
in order to do update /etc/mtab.
Now, when I build 2.21 with a plain './configure' run, everything works
as expected. However, when I build 2.21 with './configure
--enable-new-mount', the 2nd call to 'mount' appears to actually perform
the mount, as opposed to simply updating /etc/mtab, thereby meaning that
files/directories we expect to be there are no longer visible.
As mentioned above, I tried to reproduce this with a minimal test-case
executed after boot, but the following *always* works correctly with
both old and new (libmount-based) mount:
mkdir /tmp/run
mount -n /tmp/run
touch /tmp/run/test
ls -l /tmp/run/test
mount -f /tmp/run
ls -l /tmp/run/test
If the test case was successful at reproducing the fault, I'd expect the
1st 'ls' command to show 1 file, and the 2nd to show 0 files.
Any ideas on either where this bug may be, or how I may go about trying
to reproduce/debug it further would be gratefully received.
Thanks,
Matt.
next reply other threads:[~2012-03-06 22:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-06 22:43 Matt Burgess [this message]
2012-03-07 7:49 ` mount -f regression in v2.21's new-mount Karel Zak
2012-03-07 22:10 ` Matt Burgess
2012-03-08 9:23 ` Karel Zak
2012-03-08 20:25 ` Matt Burgess
2012-03-09 10:53 ` Karel Zak
2012-03-09 11:30 ` Matthew Burgess
2012-03-09 12:29 ` Karel Zak
2012-03-11 19:06 ` Matt Burgess
2012-03-12 14:09 ` Voelker, Bernhard
2012-03-12 14:32 ` Karel Zak
2012-03-12 17:17 ` Pádraig Brady
2012-03-09 14:22 ` Petr Uzel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1331073821.1882.16.camel@kyoto.localdomain \
--to=matthew@linuxfromscratch.org \
--cc=util-linux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox