Util-Linux package development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
To: Petr Uzel <petr.uzel@suse.cz>
Cc: util-linux <util-linux@vger.kernel.org>,
	Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] umount: allow non-root umount of FUSE even if not in fstab
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 12:36:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110329103648.GC2475@nb.net.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110329084623.GC26819@foxbat.suse.cz>

On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:46:23AM +0200, Petr Uzel wrote:
> > I believe more and more that we need something like
> > 
> >     /etc/mount.d/{fuse,foo,...}.conf
> > 
> > where we can define such behavior for some filesystems.
> 
> Hm, I fail to understand what (regarding to this 'issue') would
> you configure there. I can imagine e.g. per-fs-type default mount
> options or enable/disable 'user mounts' (-i) per fs-type.
> 
> Is this what you think that should be configured via /etc/mount.d/*,
> or something else?

The mount(8) and umount(8) are very strict about user mounts and about
the way how it calls /sbin/[u]mount helpers. It was fine many years
ago, but now we have things like pam_mount, fuse, HAL/udisks where
mount/umount stuff is managed in a different way. It means that we
need exceptions... and exceptions suck.

I think about:

 $ cat /etc/mount.d/fuse.conf

    [usermount]
    enabled = true
    require_fstab_entry = false
    require_helper = true


and yes, things like per-fs-type default mount options is another
possibility. 

Maybe this is something what should be added to the libmount.

    Karel

-- 
 Karel Zak  <kzak@redhat.com>
 http://karelzak.blogspot.com

      parent reply	other threads:[~2011-03-29 10:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-03-28 14:04 [PATCH] umount: allow non-root umount of FUSE even if not in fstab Petr Uzel
2011-03-28 14:23 ` Miklos Szeredi
2011-03-29  8:08   ` Petr Uzel
2011-03-29  8:28   ` Karel Zak
2011-03-29  8:48     ` Miklos Szeredi
2011-03-29 10:13       ` Karel Zak
2011-03-28 22:03 ` Karel Zak
2011-03-29  8:46   ` Petr Uzel
2011-03-29  8:51     ` Miklos Szeredi
2011-03-29  8:56       ` Petr Uzel
2011-03-29 10:03         ` Karel Zak
2011-03-29 10:36     ` Karel Zak [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110329103648.GC2475@nb.net.home \
    --to=kzak@redhat.com \
    --cc=mszeredi@suse.cz \
    --cc=petr.uzel@suse.cz \
    --cc=util-linux@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox