* sfdisk: trying to create aligned partitions: fail
@ 2011-08-17 6:13 Giulio
2011-08-17 7:56 ` Karel Zak
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Giulio @ 2011-08-17 6:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: util-linux
Linux 2.6.18-238.12.1.el5
sfdisk from util-linux 2.20-rc1
fdisk (util-linux 2.20-rc1)
200GB VMware SCSI disk
It seems it's not immediately possible to create aligned partitions (ie:
starting at 1MB/2048 sectors) with sfdisk.
1) 1st try, using MBs as unit of measure:
dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sda bs=1 count=512
sfdisk -L -uM /dev/sda <<-EOF
1,1001,83
,,83
;
;
EOF
Results (starts at sector 1 instead of 1MB):
$ fdisk -lu /dev/sda
Disk /dev/sda: 214.7 GB, 214748364800 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 26108 cylinders, total 419430400 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x00000000
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sda1 1 2056319 1028159+ 83 Linux
/dev/sda2 2056320 419425019 208684350 83 Linux
2) 2nd try, using sectors as unit of measure:
dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sda bs=1 count=512
sfdisk -L -uS /dev/sda <<-EOF
2048,2050048,83
,,83
;
;
EOF
Results (wrong 2nd partition created):
$ fdisk -lu /dev/sda
Disk /dev/sda: 214.7 GB, 214748364800 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 26108 cylinders, total 419430400 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x00000000
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sda1 2048 2052095 1025024 83 Linux
/dev/sda2 1 2047 1023+ 83 Linux
/dev/sda3 2052096 419430399 208689152 83 Linux
Partition table entries are not in disk order
===
Is there some option to enable alignment?
Thanks
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: sfdisk: trying to create aligned partitions: fail
2011-08-17 6:13 sfdisk: trying to create aligned partitions: fail Giulio
@ 2011-08-17 7:56 ` Karel Zak
2011-08-17 9:31 ` Giulio
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Karel Zak @ 2011-08-17 7:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: giulioo; +Cc: util-linux
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 08:13:06AM +0200, Giulio wrote:
> Linux 2.6.18-238.12.1.el5
> sfdisk from util-linux 2.20-rc1
> fdisk (util-linux 2.20-rc1)
> 200GB VMware SCSI disk
>
> It seems it's not immediately possible to create aligned partitions (ie:
> starting at 1MB/2048 sectors) with sfdisk.
This is unsupported by sfdisk and cfdisk. You have to use fdisk or
parted.
I'll add a note about it to the man page...
Karel
--
Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
http://karelzak.blogspot.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: sfdisk: trying to create aligned partitions: fail
2011-08-17 7:56 ` Karel Zak
@ 2011-08-17 9:31 ` Giulio
2011-08-17 12:44 ` Karel Zak
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Giulio @ 2011-08-17 9:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Karel Zak; +Cc: util-linux
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 09:56:13 +0200, Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com> wrote:
>On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 08:13:06AM +0200, Giulio wrote:
>> Linux 2.6.18-238.12.1.el5
>> sfdisk from util-linux 2.20-rc1
>> fdisk (util-linux 2.20-rc1)
>> 200GB VMware SCSI disk
>>
>> It seems it's not immediately possible to create aligned partitions (ie:
>> starting at 1MB/2048 sectors) with sfdisk.
>
> This is unsupported by sfdisk and cfdisk. You have to use fdisk or
> parted.
What is unsupported?
I know sfdisk won't automatically align partitions and didn't expect it to
do it, my email was about sfdisk behaving in an unexpected way:
- not respecting 1MB as start of partition when I ask for it
- creating partitions out of order when using sectors
Maybe I chose the wrong subject, I was trying to align partition manually
and sfidk won't let me do it.
Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: sfdisk: trying to create aligned partitions: fail
2011-08-17 9:31 ` Giulio
@ 2011-08-17 12:44 ` Karel Zak
2011-08-17 13:46 ` Giulio Orsero
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Karel Zak @ 2011-08-17 12:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: giulioo; +Cc: util-linux
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 11:31:56AM +0200, Giulio wrote:
> I know sfdisk won't automatically align partitions and didn't expect it to
> do it, my email was about sfdisk behaving in an unexpected way:
> - not respecting 1MB as start of partition when I ask for it
> - creating partitions out of order when using sectors
Try --in-order command line option, the option is undocumented in old
versions ;-(
sfdisk --in-order -L -uM /dev/sdb <<-EOF
1,10,83
,,83
;
;
EOF
result (output from fdisk):
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sdb1 2048 22527 10240 83 Linux
/dev/sdb2 22528 204799 91136 83 Linux
sfdisk --in-order -L -uS /dev/sdb <<-EOF
2048,8000,83
,,83
;
;
EOF
result (output from fdisk):
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sdb1 2048 10047 4000 83 Linux
/dev/sdb2 10048 204799 97376 83 Linux
--
Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
http://karelzak.blogspot.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: sfdisk: trying to create aligned partitions: fail
2011-08-17 12:44 ` Karel Zak
@ 2011-08-17 13:46 ` Giulio Orsero
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Giulio Orsero @ 2011-08-17 13:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Karel Zak; +Cc: util-linux
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 14:44, Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 11:31:56AM +0200, Giulio wrote:
>> I know sfdisk won't automatically align partitions and didn't expect it =
to
>> do it, my email was about sfdisk behaving in an unexpected way:
>> - not respecting 1MB as start of partition when I ask for it
>> - creating partitions out of order when using sectors
>
> =C2=A0Try --in-order command line option, the option is undocumented in o=
ld
> =C2=A0versions ;-(
With "--in-order" the issue with partitions out of order (the case in
which I was using -uS) is solved.
However, there still is an isse when using -uM
I was trying with a 200GB VMware disk and when I used -uM and 1 as
start of 1st partition sfdisk would create a partition starting at
sector 1 (not MB 1).
I see you used a 100MB disk, so I tried different sizes until I found
when the error appears, unfortunately I'm not able to fine grain sizes
in VMware more than the following:
=3D=3D command used
DEV=3D$1
dd if=3D/dev/zero of=3D/dev/$DEV bs=3D1 count=3D512
sfdisk --in-order -L -uM /dev/$DEV <<-EOF
1,10,83
,,83
;
;
EOF
=3D=3D
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D with a 1062MB, OK:
Disk /dev/sdc: 1062 MB, 1062207488 bytes
64 heads, 32 sectors/track, 1013 cylinders, total 2074624 sectors
Units =3D sectors of 1 * 512 =3D 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x00000000
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sdc1 2048 22527 10240 83 Linux
<=3D=3D=3D=3D start sector 2048
/dev/sdc2 22528 2074623 1026048 83 Linux
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D with a 1073MB, NOT-OK:
Disk /dev/sdb: 1073 MB, 1073741824 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 130 cylinders, total 2097152 sectors
Units =3D sectors of 1 * 512 =3D 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x00000000
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sdb1 1 32129 16064+ 83 Linux
<=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D start sector 1
/dev/sdb2 32130 2088449 1028160 83 Linux
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
Thanks
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-08-17 13:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-08-17 6:13 sfdisk: trying to create aligned partitions: fail Giulio
2011-08-17 7:56 ` Karel Zak
2011-08-17 9:31 ` Giulio
2011-08-17 12:44 ` Karel Zak
2011-08-17 13:46 ` Giulio Orsero
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox