Util-Linux package development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
Cc: util-linux@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Subject: Racy loop device reuse logic
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2022 16:47:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220113154735.hdzi4cqsz5jt6asp@quack3.lan> (raw)

Hello,

Tetsuo has been doing some changes to the loop device shutdown in the
kernel and that broke LTP that is doing essentially the following loop:

while :; do mount -o loop,ro isofs.iso isofs/; umount isofs/; done

And this loop is broken because of a subtle interaction with systemd-udev
that also opens the loop device. The race seems to be in mount(8) handling
itself and the altered kernel timing makes it happen. It look like:

bash					systemd-udev
  mount -o loop,ro isofs.iso isofs/
    /dev/loop0 is created and bound to isofs.iso, autoclear is set for
    loop0
  					opens /dev/loop0
  umount isofs/
  loop0 still lives because systemd-udev still has device open
  mount -o loop,ro isofs.iso isofs/
    gets to mnt_context_setup_loopdev()
      loopcxt_find_overlap()
      sees loop0 is still valid and with proper parameters
      reuse = true;
					close /dev/loop0
					  last fd closed => loop0 is
					    cleaned up
      loopcxt_get_fd()
        opens loop0 but it is no longer the device we wanted!
    calls mount(2) which fails because we cannot read from the loop device

It seems to me that mnt_context_setup_loopdev() should actually recheck
that loop device parameters still match what we need after opening
/dev/loop0 (if LOOP_GET_STATUS ioctl succeeds on the fd, you are guaranteed
the loop device is in that state and will not be torn down under your
hands). What do you think?

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR

             reply	other threads:[~2022-01-13 15:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-13 15:47 Jan Kara [this message]
2022-01-19  8:52 ` Racy loop device reuse logic Jan Kara
2022-01-19 11:30   ` Tetsuo Handa
2022-01-19 21:34     ` Jan Kara
2022-01-20  8:50       ` Karel Zak
2022-01-20 10:09         ` Tetsuo Handa
2022-01-19 11:39   ` Karel Zak
2022-01-19 21:34     ` Jan Kara
2022-01-20 12:13       ` Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220113154735.hdzi4cqsz5jt6asp@quack3.lan \
    --to=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=kzak@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
    --cc=util-linux@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox